{"title":"[A CASE OF LYMPH NODE TUBERCULOSIS ASSOCIATED WITH A FLUID-FILLED MASS IN THE THORACIC WALL DUE TO A PARADOXICAL RESPONSE TO THERAPY].","authors":"Yuichiro Araki, Akiko Harata, Hiroyoshi Maeda","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A 72-year-old man was admitted to our hospital in November 201X- 1 because of fever and left cervical lymph node swelling. Chest computed tomography (CT) confirmed left swelling in the cervical lymph node and the axillary lymph node. We performed a lymph node biopsy and diagnosed tuberculosis of the lymph nodes (the left cervical region and the axilla). The patient was treated with anti-tuberculosis drugs (isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide) in December 14, 201X-1. After initiating the therapy, the fever resolved, and his general conditions gradually improved. Thus, the patient recovered well because of the anti-tubercu- losis therapy. Despite maintaining good general conditions, the patient experienced increasing swelling in his left hemi- thorax around the end of January 201X. A chest CT showed a clear fluid-filled mass in the left thoracic wall. Microscopic examination of the specimen obtained by CT-guided needle biopsy showed positive results for acid-fast bacteria and polymerase chain reaction for Mycobacterium tuberculosis indicated that the anti-tuberculosis therapy had failed. How- ever, the patient's general conditions remained good, and the results of blood laboratory tests were stable. Thus, we concluded that the mass was the result of a paradoxical response to the anti-tuberculosis therapy, and we reinstated the same therapy. Although the fluid-filled mass recurred in the same region less than a month following the first anti-tuberculosis therapy, the mass spontaneously regressed when the therapy was reinstated. Thus, we confirmed that a paradoxical response was the cause of the clinical course in this patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":17997,"journal":{"name":"Kekkaku : [Tuberculosis]","volume":"91 6","pages":"545-549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kekkaku : [Tuberculosis]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A 72-year-old man was admitted to our hospital in November 201X- 1 because of fever and left cervical lymph node swelling. Chest computed tomography (CT) confirmed left swelling in the cervical lymph node and the axillary lymph node. We performed a lymph node biopsy and diagnosed tuberculosis of the lymph nodes (the left cervical region and the axilla). The patient was treated with anti-tuberculosis drugs (isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide) in December 14, 201X-1. After initiating the therapy, the fever resolved, and his general conditions gradually improved. Thus, the patient recovered well because of the anti-tubercu- losis therapy. Despite maintaining good general conditions, the patient experienced increasing swelling in his left hemi- thorax around the end of January 201X. A chest CT showed a clear fluid-filled mass in the left thoracic wall. Microscopic examination of the specimen obtained by CT-guided needle biopsy showed positive results for acid-fast bacteria and polymerase chain reaction for Mycobacterium tuberculosis indicated that the anti-tuberculosis therapy had failed. How- ever, the patient's general conditions remained good, and the results of blood laboratory tests were stable. Thus, we concluded that the mass was the result of a paradoxical response to the anti-tuberculosis therapy, and we reinstated the same therapy. Although the fluid-filled mass recurred in the same region less than a month following the first anti-tuberculosis therapy, the mass spontaneously regressed when the therapy was reinstated. Thus, we confirmed that a paradoxical response was the cause of the clinical course in this patient.