Routine Preoperative Coagulation Tests in Children Undergoing Elective Surgery or Invasive Procedures: Are They Still Necessary?

IF 3 Q2 Medicine
Clinical Medicine Insights-Blood Disorders Pub Date : 2019-01-05 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179545X18821158
Azzah Alzahrani, Nada Othman, Tahani Bin-Ali, Huda Elfaraidi, Eman Al Mussaed, Fahad Alabbas, Qanita Sedick, Fatma Albatniji, Ziyad Alshahrani, Mohammed Asiri, Omar Alsuhaibani, Ghaleb Elyamany
{"title":"Routine Preoperative Coagulation Tests in Children Undergoing Elective Surgery or Invasive Procedures: Are They Still Necessary?","authors":"Azzah Alzahrani,&nbsp;Nada Othman,&nbsp;Tahani Bin-Ali,&nbsp;Huda Elfaraidi,&nbsp;Eman Al Mussaed,&nbsp;Fahad Alabbas,&nbsp;Qanita Sedick,&nbsp;Fatma Albatniji,&nbsp;Ziyad Alshahrani,&nbsp;Mohammed Asiri,&nbsp;Omar Alsuhaibani,&nbsp;Ghaleb Elyamany","doi":"10.1177/1179545X18821158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Preoperative coagulation screening tests in pediatric patients was once routine clinical practice globally and still used as standard practice in some countries before surgical procedures to assess of perioperative bleeding risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate unselected routine preoperative coagulation testing in children undergoing elective or invasive surgery to predict abnormal perioperative bleeding. The study also aimed to provide a rational approach of determining bleeding and family history of coagulation disorders as a predictive risk for bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study conducted between 2014 and 2015 (1 year) on normal healthy children aged under 15 years admitted to the hospitals for elective mild to intermediate surgery or invasive procedures. We reviewed and collected the details of the clinical history, previous surgery, trauma, family history, detail of anti-thrombotic medication and coagulation tests performed (prothrombin time (PT), the activated partial prothrombin time (APTT), and international normalized ratio (INR)) at the time of admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2078 cases, 1940 cases had normal coagulation tests (93.4%), 77 cases had abnormal coagulation results (3.7%), and 61 patients underwent surgery without preoperative coagulation screening (2.9%). In 15 of 77 patients, coagulation tests were normal on repeat testing. A total of 52 were confirmed to have abnormal screening testing. Among these 52 cases, 45 had normal factors assay; where seven patients had abnormal factors assay. Postoperative bleeding occurred only in three cases (0.14%), two cases due to surgical procedures with normal preoperative testing and one due to hemophilia A which was detected postoperatively as no preoperative testing was performed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routine coagulation screening before surgery or invasive procedures to predict perioperative bleeding in unselected patients is not recommended. Our study emphasizes that selective preoperative testing is more appropriate. Selective criteria for consideration of the latter includes physical examination, type of surgery, family and bleeding history, and concomitant use of antiplatelet and anti-thrombotic therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":43083,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Blood Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179545X18821158","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Blood Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179545X18821158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Introduction: Preoperative coagulation screening tests in pediatric patients was once routine clinical practice globally and still used as standard practice in some countries before surgical procedures to assess of perioperative bleeding risk.

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate unselected routine preoperative coagulation testing in children undergoing elective or invasive surgery to predict abnormal perioperative bleeding. The study also aimed to provide a rational approach of determining bleeding and family history of coagulation disorders as a predictive risk for bleeding.

Methods: This retrospective study conducted between 2014 and 2015 (1 year) on normal healthy children aged under 15 years admitted to the hospitals for elective mild to intermediate surgery or invasive procedures. We reviewed and collected the details of the clinical history, previous surgery, trauma, family history, detail of anti-thrombotic medication and coagulation tests performed (prothrombin time (PT), the activated partial prothrombin time (APTT), and international normalized ratio (INR)) at the time of admission.

Results: Among 2078 cases, 1940 cases had normal coagulation tests (93.4%), 77 cases had abnormal coagulation results (3.7%), and 61 patients underwent surgery without preoperative coagulation screening (2.9%). In 15 of 77 patients, coagulation tests were normal on repeat testing. A total of 52 were confirmed to have abnormal screening testing. Among these 52 cases, 45 had normal factors assay; where seven patients had abnormal factors assay. Postoperative bleeding occurred only in three cases (0.14%), two cases due to surgical procedures with normal preoperative testing and one due to hemophilia A which was detected postoperatively as no preoperative testing was performed.

Conclusions: Routine coagulation screening before surgery or invasive procedures to predict perioperative bleeding in unselected patients is not recommended. Our study emphasizes that selective preoperative testing is more appropriate. Selective criteria for consideration of the latter includes physical examination, type of surgery, family and bleeding history, and concomitant use of antiplatelet and anti-thrombotic therapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

儿童择期手术或侵入性手术的常规术前凝血检查:是否仍有必要?
导论:儿科患者的术前凝血筛查曾经是全球常规临床实践,在一些国家仍将其作为手术前评估围手术期出血风险的标准做法。目的:本研究旨在评价非选择性常规术前凝血检查在儿童择期或侵袭性手术中预测围手术期异常出血的价值。该研究还旨在提供一种合理的方法来确定出血和凝血障碍家族史作为出血的预测风险。方法:回顾性研究2014 - 2015年(1年)住院接受选择性轻度至中度手术或有创手术的15岁以下正常健康儿童。我们回顾并收集了患者入院时的临床病史、既往手术、创伤、家族史、抗栓药物细节和凝血试验(凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血酶原时间(APTT)和国际标准化比值(INR))。结果:2078例患者中,凝血检查正常1940例(93.4%),凝血检查异常77例(3.7%),手术前未进行凝血筛查61例(2.9%)。在77例患者中,15例凝血试验在重复试验中正常。共有52人被确认为筛查结果异常。52例患者中45例正常因子检测;其中7例患者进行异常因素分析。术后出血仅3例(0.14%),其中2例为术前检查正常的手术所致,1例为术前未检查的A型血友病所致。结论:不建议术前常规凝血筛查或侵入性手术预测未选择患者围手术期出血。本研究强调选择性术前检查更为合适。考虑后者的选择标准包括体格检查、手术类型、家族史和出血史,以及同时使用抗血小板和抗血栓治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信