Environmental cycles regulate development time via circadian clock mediated gating of adult emergence.

Q2 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Manishi Srivastava, Anjana James, Vishwanath Varma, Vijay Kumar Sharma, Vasu Sheeba
{"title":"Environmental cycles regulate development time via circadian clock mediated gating of adult emergence.","authors":"Manishi Srivastava,&nbsp;Anjana James,&nbsp;Vishwanath Varma,&nbsp;Vijay Kumar Sharma,&nbsp;Vasu Sheeba","doi":"10.1186/s12861-018-0180-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have implicated a role for circadian clocks in regulating pre-adult development of organisms. Among them two approaches are most notable: 1) use of insects whose clocks have different free-running periods and 2) imposition of artificial selection on either rate of development, timing of emergence or circadian period in laboratory populations. Using these two approaches, influence of clock on rate of development has been elucidated. However, the contribution of circadian clocks in determining time taken for pre-adult development has remained unclear. Here we present results of our studies aimed to understand this influence by examining populations of fruit flies carrying three different alleles of the period gene and hence having different free-running periods. We tried to achieve similarity of genetic background among the three strains while also ensuring that they harbored sufficient variation on loci other than period gene.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We find that under constant conditions, flies with long period have slower development whereas in presence of light-dark cycles (LD) of various lengths, the speed of development for each genotype is influenced by whether their eclosion rhythms can entrain to them. Under LD 12:12 (T24), where all three strains entrain, they do not show any difference in time taken for emergence, whereas under LD 10:10 (T20) where long period flies do not entrain and LD 14:14 (T28) where short period flies do not entrain, they have slower and faster pre-adult development, respectively, compared to the controls. We also show that a prior stage in development namely pupation is not rhythmic though time taken for pupation is determined by both the environmental cycle and period allele.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We discuss how in presence of daily time cues, interaction of the cyclic environmental factors with the clock determines the position and width of the gate available for a fly to emerge (duration of time within a cycle when adult emergence can occur) resulting in an altered developmental duration from that observed under constant conditions. We also discuss the relevance of genetic background influencing this regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9130,"journal":{"name":"BMC Developmental Biology","volume":"18 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12861-018-0180-6","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Developmental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12861-018-0180-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have implicated a role for circadian clocks in regulating pre-adult development of organisms. Among them two approaches are most notable: 1) use of insects whose clocks have different free-running periods and 2) imposition of artificial selection on either rate of development, timing of emergence or circadian period in laboratory populations. Using these two approaches, influence of clock on rate of development has been elucidated. However, the contribution of circadian clocks in determining time taken for pre-adult development has remained unclear. Here we present results of our studies aimed to understand this influence by examining populations of fruit flies carrying three different alleles of the period gene and hence having different free-running periods. We tried to achieve similarity of genetic background among the three strains while also ensuring that they harbored sufficient variation on loci other than period gene.

Results: We find that under constant conditions, flies with long period have slower development whereas in presence of light-dark cycles (LD) of various lengths, the speed of development for each genotype is influenced by whether their eclosion rhythms can entrain to them. Under LD 12:12 (T24), where all three strains entrain, they do not show any difference in time taken for emergence, whereas under LD 10:10 (T20) where long period flies do not entrain and LD 14:14 (T28) where short period flies do not entrain, they have slower and faster pre-adult development, respectively, compared to the controls. We also show that a prior stage in development namely pupation is not rhythmic though time taken for pupation is determined by both the environmental cycle and period allele.

Conclusion: We discuss how in presence of daily time cues, interaction of the cyclic environmental factors with the clock determines the position and width of the gate available for a fly to emerge (duration of time within a cycle when adult emergence can occur) resulting in an altered developmental duration from that observed under constant conditions. We also discuss the relevance of genetic background influencing this regulation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

环境周期通过生物钟介导的成虫羽化调节发育时间。
背景:先前的研究暗示了生物钟在调节生物体成体前发育中的作用。其中有两种方法是最值得注意的:1)使用生物钟有不同自由运行周期的昆虫;2)在实验室种群中对发育速度、出现时间或昼夜节律强加人工选择。利用这两种方法,阐明了时钟对开发速度的影响。然而,生物钟在决定成人前发育所需时间方面的作用仍不清楚。在这里,我们展示了我们的研究结果,旨在通过检测携带三种不同的周期基因等位基因的果蝇种群,从而了解这种影响,从而具有不同的自由运行期。我们试图在三个菌株之间实现遗传背景的相似性,同时确保它们在除周期基因以外的位点上有足够的变异。结果:我们发现,在一定条件下,长周期的果蝇发育较慢,而不同长度的光-暗周期(LD)存在时,每个基因型的发育速度受到其羽化节律是否能携带的影响。在ld12:12 (T24)下,所有三种菌株都携带,它们的羽化时间没有任何差异,而在ld10:10 (T20)下,长周期苍蝇不携带,ld14:14 (T28)下,短周期苍蝇不携带,它们的成虫前发育分别比对照慢和快。我们还表明,尽管化蛹所需的时间由环境周期和时期等位基因决定,但在发育的前一阶段即化蛹没有节奏性。结论:我们讨论了在日常时间线索存在的情况下,循环环境因素与生物钟的相互作用如何决定苍蝇出现的门的位置和宽度(成虫出现的周期内持续的时间),从而导致在恒定条件下观察到的发育持续时间的改变。我们还讨论了影响这一调控的遗传背景的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Developmental Biology
BMC Developmental Biology 生物-发育生物学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Developmental Biology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the development, growth, differentiation and regeneration of multicellular organisms, including molecular, cellular, tissue, organ and whole organism research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信