{"title":"[Should Long-acting Antipsychotic Injection be Considered an Essential Treatment Option for Patients with Schizophrenia?].","authors":"Koji Matsuo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this article (and the corresponding symposium) was to assume an \"oppo- sition\" stance and argue against the presumed usefulness of long-acting injections (LAI) for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Here, LAI demonstrated limited patient applica- bility and were found to be used infrequently in Japan, with insufficient evidence to their effi- cacy suggesting that LAI would be more appropriate playing a supplementary role in the pharmacotherapy guidelines for schizophrenia. Additionally, any potential benefits of LAI have yet to be fully realized in Japan due to the fact that 80% of patients treated with LAI for schizophrenia are also prescribed antipsychotics orally, and a hesitance towards LAI by psy- chiatrists is likely to be reflected in their limited usage nationwide, an attitude which may present an ethical problem in terms of just principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":21638,"journal":{"name":"Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica","volume":"118 8","pages":"598-606"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective of this article (and the corresponding symposium) was to assume an "oppo- sition" stance and argue against the presumed usefulness of long-acting injections (LAI) for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Here, LAI demonstrated limited patient applica- bility and were found to be used infrequently in Japan, with insufficient evidence to their effi- cacy suggesting that LAI would be more appropriate playing a supplementary role in the pharmacotherapy guidelines for schizophrenia. Additionally, any potential benefits of LAI have yet to be fully realized in Japan due to the fact that 80% of patients treated with LAI for schizophrenia are also prescribed antipsychotics orally, and a hesitance towards LAI by psy- chiatrists is likely to be reflected in their limited usage nationwide, an attitude which may present an ethical problem in terms of just principles.