[How Jungian Psychology Has Been Developed in Japan].

Yasuhiro Yamanaka
{"title":"[How Jungian Psychology Has Been Developed in Japan].","authors":"Yasuhiro Yamanaka","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Jungian Psychology was introduced to Japan in 1931 by Kokyo Nakamura for the first time in Sekai Daishiso Zenshu (\"The Complete Works of Thoughts in the World\") vol. 33. (Shunjusha Publishing Company). Yoshitaka Takahashi and others made Jungian Psychology more accessible to the Japanese public in the mid-1950s although they did not succeed in full repre- sentation of the fundamental ideas of C. G. Jung. It was Hayao Kawai who truly understood those ideas and initiated the Jungian movements in Japan in 1967. In my opinion, however, there are hardly any Jungian Analysts who develop Jung's ideas further enough to reach a new awareness of the human psyche except a very few people such as Neumann, E., and Gug- genbtihl-Craig, A., Kalff, D. M., Spiegelman, M., Meier, C. A. and Hillman, J., Giegerich, W, in the West and H. Kawai and me in Japan. Kawai develops and deepens Jungian thoughts to a cer- tain extent in his book, The Buddhist Priest Myoe : A Life of Dreams (Shohakusha Publishing Company), while his understanding of Buddhism does not exceed what D. T. Suzuki describes in his work, An Introduction to Zen Buddhism. That is to say the ideas of both Zen and Shin Buddhism are abstracted and assimilated in general Buddhism in his work, resulting in losing their unique features which could have been pursued further. Moreover, although Kawai translates Jung's idea of SynchronizitAt to \"kyoji-sei\" (synchronicity), I claim that \"engi-ritsu\" (the pratitya-samutpada principle) would be a more appropriate term to reflect the original concept as it would imply the opposite principle to\"inga-ritsu\" (the causal principle). It should be noted that the pratitya-samutpada principle is different from the Buddhist concept of pratitya- samutpada which includes causality. In addition I transcribed the Avatamsaka sutra, which originated in India and was developed in China. I also attended to the 2\"d international confer- ence featuring the Avatamsaka sutra at Belesbat on the outskirts of Paris. Eventually I have reached an idea that when combined with the concept of the pratitya-samutpada principle, the Avatamsaka sutra could be considered as a-product of Eastern wisdom which would provide an insight beyond Jung. What was originally comprehended by Gautama Buddha was crystallised in abstract images of Amitabha and Vairocana in China during the second and fourth centuries. Amitabha is a celestial buddha that Shinran, the founder of Shin Buddhism, established his own understanding of in his school whereas Vairocana is a celestial buddha that appears in the Avatamsaka sutra. Vairocana could be taken as an image of the\"rising sun\", the creator of all things, while Amitabha as the \"sinking sun\", the saviour of all creatures. This picture of psychological cosmology gives a new perspective on the human psyche that would succeed Jungian Psychology. I believe this unique conception is equivalent to the findings in modern physical cosmology, such as Einstein's theories and the Alpha-Beta-Gamow paper, which provided a new understanding of the universe.</p>","PeriodicalId":21638,"journal":{"name":"Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica","volume":"118 12","pages":"916-924"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jungian Psychology was introduced to Japan in 1931 by Kokyo Nakamura for the first time in Sekai Daishiso Zenshu ("The Complete Works of Thoughts in the World") vol. 33. (Shunjusha Publishing Company). Yoshitaka Takahashi and others made Jungian Psychology more accessible to the Japanese public in the mid-1950s although they did not succeed in full repre- sentation of the fundamental ideas of C. G. Jung. It was Hayao Kawai who truly understood those ideas and initiated the Jungian movements in Japan in 1967. In my opinion, however, there are hardly any Jungian Analysts who develop Jung's ideas further enough to reach a new awareness of the human psyche except a very few people such as Neumann, E., and Gug- genbtihl-Craig, A., Kalff, D. M., Spiegelman, M., Meier, C. A. and Hillman, J., Giegerich, W, in the West and H. Kawai and me in Japan. Kawai develops and deepens Jungian thoughts to a cer- tain extent in his book, The Buddhist Priest Myoe : A Life of Dreams (Shohakusha Publishing Company), while his understanding of Buddhism does not exceed what D. T. Suzuki describes in his work, An Introduction to Zen Buddhism. That is to say the ideas of both Zen and Shin Buddhism are abstracted and assimilated in general Buddhism in his work, resulting in losing their unique features which could have been pursued further. Moreover, although Kawai translates Jung's idea of SynchronizitAt to "kyoji-sei" (synchronicity), I claim that "engi-ritsu" (the pratitya-samutpada principle) would be a more appropriate term to reflect the original concept as it would imply the opposite principle to"inga-ritsu" (the causal principle). It should be noted that the pratitya-samutpada principle is different from the Buddhist concept of pratitya- samutpada which includes causality. In addition I transcribed the Avatamsaka sutra, which originated in India and was developed in China. I also attended to the 2"d international confer- ence featuring the Avatamsaka sutra at Belesbat on the outskirts of Paris. Eventually I have reached an idea that when combined with the concept of the pratitya-samutpada principle, the Avatamsaka sutra could be considered as a-product of Eastern wisdom which would provide an insight beyond Jung. What was originally comprehended by Gautama Buddha was crystallised in abstract images of Amitabha and Vairocana in China during the second and fourth centuries. Amitabha is a celestial buddha that Shinran, the founder of Shin Buddhism, established his own understanding of in his school whereas Vairocana is a celestial buddha that appears in the Avatamsaka sutra. Vairocana could be taken as an image of the"rising sun", the creator of all things, while Amitabha as the "sinking sun", the saviour of all creatures. This picture of psychological cosmology gives a new perspective on the human psyche that would succeed Jungian Psychology. I believe this unique conception is equivalent to the findings in modern physical cosmology, such as Einstein's theories and the Alpha-Beta-Gamow paper, which provided a new understanding of the universe.

[荣格心理学在日本的发展历程]。
荣格心理学于1931年由中村光代在《世界思想全集》第33卷中首次引入日本。(顺居社出版社)。在20世纪50年代中期,Yoshitaka Takahashi和其他人使荣格心理学更容易为日本公众所接受,尽管他们没有成功地充分表达荣格的基本思想。真正理解这些思想并于1967年在日本发起荣格运动的人是河合浩。然而,在我看来,几乎没有任何荣格分析家能够进一步发展荣格的思想,以达到对人类心理的新认识,除了极少数人,如西方的诺伊曼,E.和古格-根蒂希尔-克雷格,a .卡尔夫,D. M.,斯皮格尔曼,M.,迈尔,C.,希尔曼,J.,吉格里希,W .,以及日本的H.卡瓦伊和我。河合在他的著作《禅师美江:梦的一生》(Shohakusha出版公司)中对荣格思想进行了一定程度的发展和深化,而他对佛教的理解并没有超过铃木在他的著作《禅宗导论》中所描述的。也就是说,在他的作品中,禅宗和真宗的思想都被抽象和同化于一般佛教中,从而失去了它们可以进一步追求的独特之处。此外,虽然川合将荣格的同时性思想翻译为“共时性”(kyoji-sei),但我认为“实性原则”(pratiya -samutpada principle)更适合反映原始概念,因为它暗示了与“因性原则”(inga-ritsu)相反的原则。需要注意的是,正义性原则与佛教的正义性概念不同,佛教的正义性概念包含因果关系。此外,我抄写了《华严经》,它起源于印度,在中国发展。我还参加了在巴黎郊区Belesbat举行的第二次华严经国际研讨会。最后,我有了一个想法,当结合了实性原则的概念时,华严经可以被认为是东方智慧的产物,它将提供超越荣格的洞察力。乔达摩佛陀最初所理解的,在公元2世纪和4世纪的中国,被结晶为抽象的阿弥陀佛和毗罗迦拿的形象。阿弥陀佛是新宗的创始人真然在他的学派中建立了自己的理解,而毗罗迦那是在华严经中出现的天佛。瓦罗迦那可以被看作是“朝阳”的形象,是万物的创造者,而阿弥陀佛是“夕阳”的形象,是万物的救世主。心理宇宙学的这幅图景为人类心理提供了一个新的视角,它将继承荣格心理学。我相信这个独特的概念相当于现代物理宇宙学的发现,比如爱因斯坦的理论和Alpha-Beta-Gamow论文,它们提供了对宇宙的新认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信