[Studies on Naikan Therapy Focusing on Its Ideological Background -A Comparison between Japanese and Western Patterns of Thought and Reconsidering Max Weber's Theory].

Keiichi Nagayama
{"title":"[Studies on Naikan Therapy Focusing on Its Ideological Background -A Comparison between Japanese and Western Patterns of Thought and Reconsidering Max Weber's Theory].","authors":"Keiichi Nagayama","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A deliberately crafted setting of intensive Naikan therapy has its base in traditional Japa- nese culture that attaches importance to practical and procedural knowledge. Whereas a ratio- nal explanation by using descriptive knowledge is valued in western society, Japanese society tends to value procedural knowledge. The contrast between these two values can be explained by a difference in understanding transcendent existences. In Western society, it has been understood in relation to logos related to logical orderliness. On the other hand, it has been understood in relation to WAZA, which has to do with a magical or hands-on knowledge. Both types of knowledge involve two phases in a process of development; construction and deconstruction. The deconstructive phase in which reformation and renovation of knowledge is induced consists of intuitive and holistic experience, which in Western Christian society is related to hypostasis-persona of the Trinity, while it is related to \"sumu\" from Shintoism in Japan. Both are symbols of the Creation, coming from the precipitative phenomenon, symbolized in liquid. Insight in psychotherapy is one with a person's experience of deconstructing procedural knowledge. Max Weber has discussed over these two kinds of knowledge and its construction/deconstruction moments. Reconsidering Weber's theory from a psychotherapeutic viewpoint will therefore give us a new key to understand the core of legitimacy of domination and a Tenno system of Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":21638,"journal":{"name":"Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica","volume":"118 12","pages":"903-909"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A deliberately crafted setting of intensive Naikan therapy has its base in traditional Japa- nese culture that attaches importance to practical and procedural knowledge. Whereas a ratio- nal explanation by using descriptive knowledge is valued in western society, Japanese society tends to value procedural knowledge. The contrast between these two values can be explained by a difference in understanding transcendent existences. In Western society, it has been understood in relation to logos related to logical orderliness. On the other hand, it has been understood in relation to WAZA, which has to do with a magical or hands-on knowledge. Both types of knowledge involve two phases in a process of development; construction and deconstruction. The deconstructive phase in which reformation and renovation of knowledge is induced consists of intuitive and holistic experience, which in Western Christian society is related to hypostasis-persona of the Trinity, while it is related to "sumu" from Shintoism in Japan. Both are symbols of the Creation, coming from the precipitative phenomenon, symbolized in liquid. Insight in psychotherapy is one with a person's experience of deconstructing procedural knowledge. Max Weber has discussed over these two kinds of knowledge and its construction/deconstruction moments. Reconsidering Weber's theory from a psychotherapeutic viewpoint will therefore give us a new key to understand the core of legitimacy of domination and a Tenno system of Japan.

[以思想背景为中心的奈坎疗法研究——日本与西方思维模式之比较与对马克斯·韦伯理论的再思考]。
一个精心设计的强化奈康疗法的设置,其基础是传统的日本文化,重视实践和程序知识。西方社会重视描述性知识的比例解释,而日本社会则倾向于重视程序性知识。这两种价值观之间的差异可以用对先验存在的不同理解来解释。在西方社会,它被理解为与逻辑秩序相关的逻各斯。另一方面,它被理解为与WAZA有关,这与魔法或实践知识有关。这两种类型的知识在发展过程中都涉及两个阶段;建构和解构。引发知识改革和革新的解构阶段是直观的、整体的经验,在西方基督教社会与三位一体的位格有关,而在日本则与神道教的“sumu”有关。两者都是创造的象征,来自于沉淀现象,以液体为象征。心理治疗中的洞察力是一个人解构程序性知识的经验。马克斯·韦伯对这两种知识及其建构/解构时刻进行了探讨。因此,从心理治疗的角度重新审视韦伯的理论,将为我们理解统治合法性的核心和日本的天诺制度提供一把新的钥匙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信