Thomas K Smylla, Markus Meier, Anette Preiss, Dieter Maier
{"title":"The Notch repressor complex in Drosophila: in vivo analysis of Hairless mutants using overexpression experiments.","authors":"Thomas K Smylla, Markus Meier, Anette Preiss, Dieter Maier","doi":"10.1007/s00427-018-00624-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During development of higher animals, the Notch signalling pathway governs cell type specification by mediating appropriate gene expression responses. In the absence of signalling, Notch target genes are silenced by repressor complexes. In the model organism Drosophila melanogaster, the repressor complex includes the transcription factor Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)] and Hairless (H) plus general co-repressors. Recent crystal structure analysis of the Drosophila Notch repressor revealed details of the Su(H)-H complex. They were confirmed by mutational analyses of either protein; however, only Su(H) mutants have been further studied in vivo. Here, we analyse three H variants predicted to affect Su(H) binding. To this end, amino acid replacements Phenylalanine 237, Leucines 245 and 247, as well as Tryptophan 258 to Alanine were introduced into the H protein. A cell-based reporter assay indicates substantial loss of Su(H) binding to the respective mutant proteins H<sup>FA</sup>, H<sup>LLAA</sup> and H<sup>WA</sup>. For in vivo analysis, UAS-lines H<sup>FA</sup>, H<sup>LLAA</sup> and H<sup>WA</sup> were generated to allow spatially restricted overexpression. In these assays, all three mutants resembled the H<sup>LD</sup> control, shown before to lack Su(H) binding, indicating a strong reduction of H activity. For example, the H variants were impaired in wing margin formation, but unexpectedly induced ectopic wing venation. Concurrent overexpression with Su(H), however, suggests that all mutant H protein isoforms are still able to bind Su(H) in vivo. We conclude that a weakening of the cohesion in the H-Su(H) repressor complex is sufficient for disrupting its in vivo functionality.</p>","PeriodicalId":50588,"journal":{"name":"Development Genes and Evolution","volume":"229 1","pages":"13-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Genes and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-018-00624-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
During development of higher animals, the Notch signalling pathway governs cell type specification by mediating appropriate gene expression responses. In the absence of signalling, Notch target genes are silenced by repressor complexes. In the model organism Drosophila melanogaster, the repressor complex includes the transcription factor Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)] and Hairless (H) plus general co-repressors. Recent crystal structure analysis of the Drosophila Notch repressor revealed details of the Su(H)-H complex. They were confirmed by mutational analyses of either protein; however, only Su(H) mutants have been further studied in vivo. Here, we analyse three H variants predicted to affect Su(H) binding. To this end, amino acid replacements Phenylalanine 237, Leucines 245 and 247, as well as Tryptophan 258 to Alanine were introduced into the H protein. A cell-based reporter assay indicates substantial loss of Su(H) binding to the respective mutant proteins HFA, HLLAA and HWA. For in vivo analysis, UAS-lines HFA, HLLAA and HWA were generated to allow spatially restricted overexpression. In these assays, all three mutants resembled the HLD control, shown before to lack Su(H) binding, indicating a strong reduction of H activity. For example, the H variants were impaired in wing margin formation, but unexpectedly induced ectopic wing venation. Concurrent overexpression with Su(H), however, suggests that all mutant H protein isoforms are still able to bind Su(H) in vivo. We conclude that a weakening of the cohesion in the H-Su(H) repressor complex is sufficient for disrupting its in vivo functionality.
在高等动物的发育过程中,Notch信号通路通过介导适当的基因表达反应来控制细胞类型的规范。在缺乏信号传导的情况下,Notch靶基因被抑制因子复合物沉默。在模式生物黑腹果蝇(Drosophila melanogaster)中,抑制因子复合物包括转录因子Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)]和Hairless (H)加上一般的协同抑制因子。最近对果蝇Notch抑制因子的晶体结构分析揭示了Su(H)-H复合物的细节。它们被两种蛋白的突变分析所证实;然而,只有Su(H)突变体在体内得到了进一步的研究。在这里,我们分析了三种预测会影响Su(H)结合的H变异。为此,在H蛋白中引入氨基酸替代苯丙氨酸237、亮氨酸245和247,以及色氨酸258替代丙氨酸。一项基于细胞的报告基因检测表明,Su(H)与相应突变蛋白HFA、HLLAA和HWA的结合明显缺失。为了进行体内分析,生成了uas系HFA、HLLAA和HWA,以允许空间限制性过表达。在这些实验中,所有三个突变体与HLD对照相似,之前显示缺乏Su(H)结合,表明H活性强烈降低。例如,H变异在翼缘形成中受损,但意外地诱导了异位翼脉形成。然而,与Su(H)同时过表达表明,所有突变的H蛋白亚型在体内仍然能够结合Su(H)。我们得出结论,H- su (H)阻遏物复合物内聚力的减弱足以破坏其体内功能。
期刊介绍:
Development Genes and Evolution publishes high-quality reports on all aspects of development biology and evolutionary biology. The journal reports on experimental and bioinformatics work at the systemic, cellular and molecular levels in the field of animal and plant systems, covering key aspects of the following topics:
Embryological and genetic analysis of model and non-model organisms
Genes and pattern formation in invertebrates, vertebrates and plants
Axial patterning, embryonic induction and fate maps
Cellular mechanisms of morphogenesis and organogenesis
Stem cells and regeneration
Functional genomics of developmental processes
Developmental diversity and evolution
Evolution of developmentally relevant genes
Phylogeny of animals and plants
Microevolution
Paleontology.