Acceptance of Rehabilitation Technology in Adults With Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Their Caregivers, and Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review.

Atiyeh Vaezipour, Brooke-Mai Whelan, Kylie Wall, Deborah Theodoros
{"title":"Acceptance of Rehabilitation Technology in Adults With Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Their Caregivers, and Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Atiyeh Vaezipour,&nbsp;Brooke-Mai Whelan,&nbsp;Kylie Wall,&nbsp;Deborah Theodoros","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) commonly result in persistent physical, cognitive, and/or emotional deficits that require long-term rehabilitation. Technology-enabled rehabilitation provides an innovative alternative to traditional intervention models. End-user acceptance of these interventions, however, is a critical factor in determining the effective implementation and acceptance of these technologies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the literature to identify methods and measures used to evaluate user acceptance relating to rehabilitation technologies for adults with moderate to severe TBI, their caregivers, and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six key databases including Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched using the relevant search terms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a yield of 2059 studies, 13 studies met the eligibility criteria. The review revealed limited research that formally evaluated user acceptance in relation to rehabilitation technologies designed for adults with TBI. Furthermore, where such evaluations were conducted, comprehensive research designs incorporating theoretical frameworks of technology acceptance were sparse. Importantly, a range of technologies and recommendations that positively influenced user acceptance were identified. Future directions for research in this area include the use of theory-driven research designs to enhance our understanding of technology acceptance, to support the development of rehabilitation technologies that maximize functional outcomes for individuals with TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":519229,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"E67-E82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000462","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Background: Moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) commonly result in persistent physical, cognitive, and/or emotional deficits that require long-term rehabilitation. Technology-enabled rehabilitation provides an innovative alternative to traditional intervention models. End-user acceptance of these interventions, however, is a critical factor in determining the effective implementation and acceptance of these technologies.

Objective: To systematically review the literature to identify methods and measures used to evaluate user acceptance relating to rehabilitation technologies for adults with moderate to severe TBI, their caregivers, and healthcare professionals.

Methods: Six key databases including Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched using the relevant search terms.

Results: From a yield of 2059 studies, 13 studies met the eligibility criteria. The review revealed limited research that formally evaluated user acceptance in relation to rehabilitation technologies designed for adults with TBI. Furthermore, where such evaluations were conducted, comprehensive research designs incorporating theoretical frameworks of technology acceptance were sparse. Importantly, a range of technologies and recommendations that positively influenced user acceptance were identified. Future directions for research in this area include the use of theory-driven research designs to enhance our understanding of technology acceptance, to support the development of rehabilitation technologies that maximize functional outcomes for individuals with TBI.

接受康复技术的成人中度至重度创伤性脑损伤,他们的护理人员和医疗保健专业人员:系统回顾。
背景:中度至重度创伤性脑损伤(tbi)通常导致持续的身体、认知和/或情绪缺陷,需要长期康复。技术支持的康复为传统干预模式提供了一种创新的替代方案。然而,最终用户对这些干预措施的接受程度是决定这些技术有效实施和接受程度的关键因素。目的:系统地回顾文献,以确定用于评估中度至重度脑外伤成人、其护理人员和医疗保健专业人员对康复技术的接受程度的方法和措施。方法:采用相关检索词对Medline、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane、Scopus、Web of Science 6个关键数据库进行检索。结果:在2059项研究中,13项研究符合入选标准。这篇综述揭示了有限的研究,正式评估了为成人脑外伤患者设计的康复技术的用户接受程度。此外,在进行这种评估的地方,纳入技术接受理论框架的综合研究设计很少。重要的是,确定了一系列对用户接受度有积极影响的技术和建议。该领域的未来研究方向包括使用理论驱动的研究设计来增强我们对技术接受度的理解,以支持康复技术的发展,最大限度地提高TBI患者的功能结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书