Validation of a Finite Element 50th Percentile THOR Anthropomorphic Test Device in Multiple Sled Test Configurations.

Q2 Medicine
Kyle P McNamara, Derek A Jones, James P Gaewsky, Jacob B Putnam, Jeffrey T Somers, Ashley A Weaver, Joel D Stitzel
{"title":"Validation of a Finite Element 50th Percentile THOR Anthropomorphic Test Device in Multiple Sled Test Configurations.","authors":"Kyle P McNamara,&nbsp;Derek A Jones,&nbsp;James P Gaewsky,&nbsp;Jacob B Putnam,&nbsp;Jeffrey T Somers,&nbsp;Ashley A Weaver,&nbsp;Joel D Stitzel","doi":"10.4271/2018-22-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Computational models of anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) can be used in crash simulations to quantify the injury risks to occupants in both a cost-effective and time-sensitive manner. The purpose of this study was to validate the performance of a 50<sup>th</sup> percentile THOR finite element (FE) model against a physical THOR ATD in 11 unique loading scenarios. Physical tests used for validation were performed on a Horizontal Impact Accelerator (HIA) where the peak sled acceleration ranged from 8-20 G and the time to peak acceleration ranged from 40-110 ms. The directions of sled acceleration relative to the THOR model consisted of -GX (frontal impact), +GY (left-sided lateral impact), and +GZ (downward vertical impact) orientations. Simulation responses were compared to physical tests using the CORrelation and Analysis (CORA) method. Using a weighted method, the average response and standard error by direction was +GY (0.83±0.03), -GX (0.80±0.01), and +GZ (0.76±0.03). Qualitative and quantitative results demonstrated the FE model's kinetics and kinematics were sufficiently validated against its counterpart physical model in the tested loading directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"62 ","pages":"415-442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stapp car crash journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-22-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Computational models of anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) can be used in crash simulations to quantify the injury risks to occupants in both a cost-effective and time-sensitive manner. The purpose of this study was to validate the performance of a 50th percentile THOR finite element (FE) model against a physical THOR ATD in 11 unique loading scenarios. Physical tests used for validation were performed on a Horizontal Impact Accelerator (HIA) where the peak sled acceleration ranged from 8-20 G and the time to peak acceleration ranged from 40-110 ms. The directions of sled acceleration relative to the THOR model consisted of -GX (frontal impact), +GY (left-sided lateral impact), and +GZ (downward vertical impact) orientations. Simulation responses were compared to physical tests using the CORrelation and Analysis (CORA) method. Using a weighted method, the average response and standard error by direction was +GY (0.83±0.03), -GX (0.80±0.01), and +GZ (0.76±0.03). Qualitative and quantitative results demonstrated the FE model's kinetics and kinematics were sufficiently validated against its counterpart physical model in the tested loading directions.

有限元50百分位THOR拟人化测试装置在多台车测试配置中的验证。
拟人测试装置(ATDs)的计算模型可以用于碰撞模拟,以经济有效和时间敏感的方式量化乘员的伤害风险。本研究的目的是验证第50百分位THOR有限元(FE)模型与物理THOR ATD在11种不同载荷情况下的性能。用于验证的物理测试是在水平冲击加速器(HIA)上进行的,其中峰值滑橇加速度范围为8-20 G,达到峰值加速度的时间范围为40-110 ms。相对于THOR模型,滑橇加速度方向为-GX(正面撞击)、+GY(左侧侧向撞击)和+GZ(垂直向下撞击)方向。使用相关分析(CORA)方法将模拟响应与物理测试进行比较。采用加权法,各方向的平均响应和标准误差分别为+GY(0.83±0.03)、-GX(0.80±0.01)和+GZ(0.76±0.03)。定性和定量结果表明,在测试的加载方向上,有限元模型的动力学和运动学与对应的物理模型得到了充分的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stapp car crash journal
Stapp car crash journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信