Perception among Healthcare Professionals of the Use of Social Media in Translating Research Evidence into Clinical Practice in Mangalore.

IF 3.1 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications Pub Date : 2018-11-21 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/7573614
Bhaskaran Unnikrishnan, Priya Rathi, Daivik Shah, Abhay Tyagi, Anish V Rao, Koyel Paul, Joe Tomy
{"title":"Perception among Healthcare Professionals of the Use of Social Media in Translating Research Evidence into Clinical Practice in Mangalore.","authors":"Bhaskaran Unnikrishnan,&nbsp;Priya Rathi,&nbsp;Daivik Shah,&nbsp;Abhay Tyagi,&nbsp;Anish V Rao,&nbsp;Koyel Paul,&nbsp;Joe Tomy","doi":"10.1155/2018/7573614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social media has a potential to bring about major changes in the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To find out the pattern of use of social media among healthcare professionals (HCPs) and perception, facilitators, and barriers of using social media, to translate evidence into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study among 196 HCPs of institutions attached to a university using a self-administered questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>97.3% used social media; however, only 63.4% used it for research. YouTube was the most preferred media. Majority of people believed that social media enables wide range of evidence over the shorter span of time, poses a threat to privacy, and cannot replace face to face interaction. Perceived barriers were the privacy concern, unprofessional behavior, lack of reliability, and information overload.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a need for the development of appropriate guidelines for sharing the research output among various stakeholders using social media.</p>","PeriodicalId":45630,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/7573614","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7573614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Social media has a potential to bring about major changes in the healthcare system.

Objective: To find out the pattern of use of social media among healthcare professionals (HCPs) and perception, facilitators, and barriers of using social media, to translate evidence into clinical practice.

Method: We conducted a cross-sectional study among 196 HCPs of institutions attached to a university using a self-administered questionnaire.

Result: 97.3% used social media; however, only 63.4% used it for research. YouTube was the most preferred media. Majority of people believed that social media enables wide range of evidence over the shorter span of time, poses a threat to privacy, and cannot replace face to face interaction. Perceived barriers were the privacy concern, unprofessional behavior, lack of reliability, and information overload.

Conclusion: There is a need for the development of appropriate guidelines for sharing the research output among various stakeholders using social media.

医疗保健专业人员对使用社交媒体将研究证据转化为芒格洛尔临床实践的看法
导读:社交媒体有可能给医疗保健系统带来重大变化。目的:了解卫生保健专业人员(HCPs)使用社交媒体的模式,以及使用社交媒体的认知、促进因素和障碍,以将证据转化为临床实践。方法:采用自填问卷对某大学附属机构196名医护人员进行横断面调查。结果:97.3%的人使用社交媒体;然而,只有63.4%的人将其用于研究。YouTube是最受欢迎的媒体。大多数人认为社交媒体可以在更短的时间内获得更广泛的证据,对隐私构成威胁,不能取代面对面的互动。感知到的障碍是隐私问题、不专业的行为、缺乏可靠性和信息过载。结论:有必要制定适当的指导方针,以便在使用社交媒体的各种利益相关者之间分享研究成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The overall aim of the International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications is to bring together science and applications of medical practice and medical care at a distance as well as their supporting technologies such as, computing, communications, and networking technologies with emphasis on telemedicine techniques and telemedicine applications. It is directed at practicing engineers, academic researchers, as well as doctors, nurses, etc. Telemedicine is an information technology that enables doctors to perform medical consultations, diagnoses, and treatments, as well as medical education, away from patients. For example, doctors can remotely examine patients via remote viewing monitors and sound devices, and/or sampling physiological data using telecommunication. Telemedicine technology is applied to areas of emergency healthcare, videoconsulting, telecardiology, telepathology, teledermatology, teleophthalmology, teleoncology, telepsychiatry, teledentistry, etc. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications will highlight the continued growth and new challenges in telemedicine, applications, and their supporting technologies, for both application development and basic research. Papers should emphasize original results or case studies relating to the theory and/or applications of telemedicine. Tutorial papers, especially those emphasizing multidisciplinary views of telemedicine, are also welcome. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications employs a paperless, electronic submission and evaluation system to promote a rapid turnaround in the peer-review process.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信