Clinical performance of one-piece zirconia dental implants: A systematic review

Q1 Medicine

Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry Pub Date : 2018-12-26 DOI:10.1111/jicd.12384

Aws S. ArRejaie, Rana S. Al-Hamdan, Ghadeer I. Basunbul, Tariq Abduljabbar, Khulud A. Al-Aali, Nawaf Labban

{"title":"Clinical performance of one-piece zirconia dental implants: A systematic review","authors":"Aws S. ArRejaie, Rana S. Al-Hamdan, Ghadeer I. Basunbul, Tariq Abduljabbar, Khulud A. Al-Aali, Nawaf Labban","doi":"10.1111/jicd.12384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of the present review was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic performance of one-piece zirconia implants (O-PZI). This review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines that addressed the following focused question: What is the overall clinical and radiographic performance of O-PZI? The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register databases were searched. Six clinical studies were included. For studies evaluating O-PZI compared with one-piece titanium implants, zirconia implants showed higher crestal bone loss (CBL) in both the studies. However, one study demonstrated a high failure rate compared to titanium dental implants, while one study demonstrated comparable survival rates between zirconia and titanium dental implants. For studies evaluating O-PZI for the restoration of single crown and fixed dental prostheses, O-PZI showed comparable bone loss and survival rates for single crowns and fixed dental prostheses. Two studies were included that compared O-PZI with two-piece zirconia (T-PZI). One study showed a higher CBL and low survival rate for O-PZI compared to T-PZI, whereas the other study demonstrated comparable CBL and survival rates between O-PZI and T-PZI. It is still debatable whether O-PZI demonstrate better clinical performance when compared with titanium implants or two-piece design.</p>","PeriodicalId":16204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jicd.12384","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jicd.12384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

Abstract

The aim of the present review was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic performance of one-piece zirconia implants (O-PZI). This review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines that addressed the following focused question: What is the overall clinical and radiographic performance of O-PZI? The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register databases were searched. Six clinical studies were included. For studies evaluating O-PZI compared with one-piece titanium implants, zirconia implants showed higher crestal bone loss (CBL) in both the studies. However, one study demonstrated a high failure rate compared to titanium dental implants, while one study demonstrated comparable survival rates between zirconia and titanium dental implants. For studies evaluating O-PZI for the restoration of single crown and fixed dental prostheses, O-PZI showed comparable bone loss and survival rates for single crowns and fixed dental prostheses. Two studies were included that compared O-PZI with two-piece zirconia (T-PZI). One study showed a higher CBL and low survival rate for O-PZI compared to T-PZI, whereas the other study demonstrated comparable CBL and survival rates between O-PZI and T-PZI. It is still debatable whether O-PZI demonstrate better clinical performance when compared with titanium implants or two-piece design.

查看原文本刊更多论文

一体式氧化锆种植体的临床应用综述

本综述的目的是评估一体式氧化锆种植体(O-PZI)的临床和影像学表现。本综述遵循PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南，该指南解决了以下重点问题:O-PZI的总体临床和放射学表现如何?检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库和Cochrane口腔健康组试验注册库数据库。纳入了6项临床研究。在评估O-PZI的研究中，与一体式钛种植体相比，氧化锆种植体在两项研究中都显示出更高的冠骨损失(CBL)。然而，一项研究表明，与钛牙种植体相比，钛牙种植体的失败率较高，而另一项研究表明，氧化锆和钛牙种植体的存活率相当。在评估O-PZI修复单冠和固定义齿的研究中，O-PZI显示出与单冠和固定义齿相当的骨丢失和存活率。两项研究将O-PZI与两片式氧化锆(T-PZI)进行了比较。一项研究显示，与T-PZI相比，O-PZI的CBL更高，生存率较低，而另一项研究显示O-PZI和T-PZI之间的CBL和生存率相当。O-PZI与钛种植体或两片式设计相比是否表现出更好的临床性能仍存在争议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

3.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry (JICD) aims to publish quality, peer reviewed original research and topical reviews on all aspects of investigative and clinical dentistry and craniofacial research, including molecular studies related to oral health and disease. Although international in outlook, the Editor especially encourages papers from the Asia Pacific. The journal also aims to provide clinicians, scientists and students of dentistry with a knowledge transfer platform for rapid publication of reports through an international journal, which will be available free online until 2012. Its scope, therefore, is broad, inclusive and international, but with a particular focus on Asia Pacific. The Editor welcomes manuscripts in the following key thematic areas in oral and maxillofacial sciences: Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, Conservative Dentistry, Dental Biomaterials, Dental Pedagogy, Endodontics and Traumatology, Implant Dentistry, Oral Biosciences, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Orthodontics, Oral Radiology, Oral Rehabilitation, Paedodontics, Periodontology and Periodontal Medicine.