Use of supplemental oxygen in emergency patients: a systematic review and recommendations for military clinical practice.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps Pub Date : 2019-12-01 Epub Date: 2018-12-15 DOI:10.1136/jramc-2018-001076
Laura Cottey, S Jefferys, T Woolley, J E Smith
{"title":"Use of supplemental oxygen in emergency patients: a systematic review and recommendations for military clinical practice.","authors":"Laura Cottey,&nbsp;S Jefferys,&nbsp;T Woolley,&nbsp;J E Smith","doi":"10.1136/jramc-2018-001076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Supplemental oxygen is a key element of emergency treatment algorithms. However, in the operational environment, oxygen supply poses a challenge. The lack of high-quality evidence alongside emerging technologies provides the opportunity to challenge current guidelines. The aim of this review was to appraise the evidence for the administration of oxygen in emergency patients and give recommendations for its use in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A critical review of the literature was undertaken to determine the evidence for emergency supplemental oxygen use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on interpretation of the limited available evidence, five key recommendations are made: pulse oximetry should be continuous and initiated as early as possible; oxygen should be available to all trauma and medical patients in the forward operating environment; if peripheral oxygen saturations (SpO<sub>2</sub>) are greater than or equal to 92%, supplemental oxygen is not routinely required; if SpO<sub>2</sub> is less than 92%, supplemental oxygen should be titrated to achieve an SpO<sub>2</sub> of greater than 92%; and if flow rates of greater than 5 L/min are required, then urgent evacuation and critical care support should be requested.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oxygen is not universally required for all patients. Current guidelines aim to prevent hypoxia but with potentially conservative limits. Oxygen should be administered to maintain SpO<sub>2</sub> at 92% or above. New areas for research, highlighted in this review, may provide a future approach for oxygen use from point of injury to definitive care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17327,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jramc-2018-001076","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jramc-2018-001076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Supplemental oxygen is a key element of emergency treatment algorithms. However, in the operational environment, oxygen supply poses a challenge. The lack of high-quality evidence alongside emerging technologies provides the opportunity to challenge current guidelines. The aim of this review was to appraise the evidence for the administration of oxygen in emergency patients and give recommendations for its use in clinical practice.

Methods: A critical review of the literature was undertaken to determine the evidence for emergency supplemental oxygen use.

Results: Based on interpretation of the limited available evidence, five key recommendations are made: pulse oximetry should be continuous and initiated as early as possible; oxygen should be available to all trauma and medical patients in the forward operating environment; if peripheral oxygen saturations (SpO2) are greater than or equal to 92%, supplemental oxygen is not routinely required; if SpO2 is less than 92%, supplemental oxygen should be titrated to achieve an SpO2 of greater than 92%; and if flow rates of greater than 5 L/min are required, then urgent evacuation and critical care support should be requested.

Conclusion: Oxygen is not universally required for all patients. Current guidelines aim to prevent hypoxia but with potentially conservative limits. Oxygen should be administered to maintain SpO2 at 92% or above. New areas for research, highlighted in this review, may provide a future approach for oxygen use from point of injury to definitive care.

急诊病人补充氧气的使用:一项系统的回顾和对军事临床实践的建议。
简介:补充氧气是紧急治疗算法的关键要素。然而,在作战环境中,氧气供应是一个挑战。高质量证据的缺乏以及新兴技术为挑战现行指南提供了机会。本综述的目的是评价急诊患者给氧的证据,并对其在临床实践中的应用提出建议。方法:对文献进行批判性回顾,以确定紧急补充氧气使用的证据。结果:基于对有限现有证据的解释,提出了5项关键建议:脉搏血氧测量应持续并尽早开始;在前方操作环境中,所有创伤和医疗病人都应获得氧气;如果外周氧饱和度(SpO2)大于或等于92%,通常不需要补充氧气;若SpO2小于92%,需补氧滴定,使SpO2大于92%;如果需要大于5l /min的流速,则应要求紧急疏散和重症监护支持。结论:并非所有患者都需要氧气。目前的指导方针旨在防止缺氧,但有潜在的保守限制。应给氧以维持SpO2在92%或以上。本综述强调的新研究领域可能为从损伤点到最终护理的氧气使用提供未来的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps
Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps aims to publish high quality research, reviews and case reports, as well as other invited articles, which pertain to the practice of military medicine in its broadest sense. It welcomes material from all ranks, services and corps wherever they serve as well as submissions from beyond the military. It is intended not only to propagate current knowledge and expertise but also to act as an institutional memory for the practice of medicine within the military.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信