Clinical Pharmacist Intervention to Engage Older Adults in Reducing Use of Alprazolam.

Hilary J Navy, Linda Weffald, Thomas Delate, Rachana J Patel, Jennifer P Dugan
{"title":"Clinical Pharmacist Intervention to Engage Older Adults in Reducing Use of Alprazolam.","authors":"Hilary J Navy,&nbsp;Linda Weffald,&nbsp;Thomas Delate,&nbsp;Rachana J Patel,&nbsp;Jennifer P Dugan","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2018.711.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>: To assess whether a letter explaining the risks of alprazolam can engage older adults to call a clinical pharmacist (CP) to initiate reduction in alprazolam use. <b>DESIGN</b>: Randomized, controlled study. <b>SETTING</b>: Integrated health care delivery system. <b>PATIENTS</b>: Patients 65 years of age and older who resided at home, had a current supply of alprazolam as of December 15, 2016, and had four outpatient dispensings of alprazolam during the previous 12 months. <b>INTERVENTION</b>: Patients were randomized to receive an educational outreach regarding alprazolam use reduction via a mailed letter (intervention group) or receive usual care (control group). Intervention patients/caregivers were requested to call the CP to discuss reduction of alprazolam use. For intervention patients who called and consented to participate, alternative treatment options were discussed on a case-by-case basis. <b>MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES</b>: Composite rate of 1) no alprazolam dispensing, 2) an alprazolam dose reduction, or 3) interchange to an alternative medication during the six-month follow-up. <b>RESULTS</b>: 153 and 173 patients were and were not, respectively, sent a letter. The mean age was 73 years and patients primarily were female. Thirty (19.6%) intervention patients called the CP. The composite rate was equivalent between the intervention (34.0%) and control (35.3%) groups (<i>P</i> = 0.822). In subanalyses, the composite rate was higher among intervention patients who did vs. those who did not call the CP (77.8% vs. 27.6%; <i>P</i> < 0.001). <b>CONCLUSION</b>: A low-cost patient educational outreach coupled with CP care efficiently engaged older adults in benzodiazepine use reduction process; however, alprazolam continues to be a challenging medication for patients to discontinue.</p>","PeriodicalId":45985,"journal":{"name":"CONSULTANT PHARMACIST","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONSULTANT PHARMACIST","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2018.711.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a letter explaining the risks of alprazolam can engage older adults to call a clinical pharmacist (CP) to initiate reduction in alprazolam use. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Integrated health care delivery system. PATIENTS: Patients 65 years of age and older who resided at home, had a current supply of alprazolam as of December 15, 2016, and had four outpatient dispensings of alprazolam during the previous 12 months. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive an educational outreach regarding alprazolam use reduction via a mailed letter (intervention group) or receive usual care (control group). Intervention patients/caregivers were requested to call the CP to discuss reduction of alprazolam use. For intervention patients who called and consented to participate, alternative treatment options were discussed on a case-by-case basis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Composite rate of 1) no alprazolam dispensing, 2) an alprazolam dose reduction, or 3) interchange to an alternative medication during the six-month follow-up. RESULTS: 153 and 173 patients were and were not, respectively, sent a letter. The mean age was 73 years and patients primarily were female. Thirty (19.6%) intervention patients called the CP. The composite rate was equivalent between the intervention (34.0%) and control (35.3%) groups (P = 0.822). In subanalyses, the composite rate was higher among intervention patients who did vs. those who did not call the CP (77.8% vs. 27.6%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A low-cost patient educational outreach coupled with CP care efficiently engaged older adults in benzodiazepine use reduction process; however, alprazolam continues to be a challenging medication for patients to discontinue.

临床药师干预老年人减少阿普唑仑的使用。
目的:评估一封解释阿普唑仑风险的信是否能促使老年人打电话给临床药剂师(CP),以开始减少阿普唑仑的使用。设计:随机对照研究。环境:综合卫生保健服务系统。患者:截至2016年12月15日,居住在家中的65岁及以上患者目前有阿普唑仑的供应,并且在过去12个月内有4次门诊阿普唑仑的配药。干预:患者被随机分为两组,一组通过邮寄信件接受有关减少阿普唑仑使用的教育外展(干预组),另一组接受常规护理(对照组)。干预患者/护理人员被要求打电话给CP讨论减少阿普唑仑的使用。对于致电并同意参与干预的患者,将根据具体情况讨论替代治疗方案。主要结局指标:1)没有阿普唑仑配药,2)阿普唑仑剂量减少,或3)在6个月随访期间更换替代药物的复合率。结果:153例患者收到了信件,173例患者没有收到信件。平均年龄73岁,患者以女性为主。30例(19.6%)干预组患者称为CP,干预组(34.0%)与对照组(35.3%)的综合发生率相当(P = 0.822)。在亚组分析中,有呼叫CP的干预患者的综合发生率高于没有呼叫CP的干预患者(77.8% vs. 27.6%;P < 0.001)。结论:低成本的患者教育外展结合CP护理有效地参与了老年人减少苯二氮卓类药物使用的过程;然而,阿普唑仑对患者来说仍然是一种具有挑战性的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CONSULTANT PHARMACIST
CONSULTANT PHARMACIST PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Vision ... The Society"s long-term desire, aspiration, and core purpose. The vision of the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists is optimal medication management and improved health outcomes for all older persons. Mission ... The Society"s strategic position, focus, and reason for being. The American Society of Consultant Pharmacists empowers pharmacists to enhance quality of care for all older persons through the appropriate use of medication and the promotion of healthy aging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信