Risk for ASD in Preterm Infants: A Three-Year Follow-Up Study.

Autism Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2018-11-11 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/8316212
Ayelet Harel-Gadassi, Edwa Friedlander, Maya Yaari, Benjamin Bar-Oz, Smadar Eventov-Friedman, David Mankuta, Nurit Yirmiya
{"title":"Risk for ASD in Preterm Infants: A Three-Year Follow-Up Study.","authors":"Ayelet Harel-Gadassi,&nbsp;Edwa Friedlander,&nbsp;Maya Yaari,&nbsp;Benjamin Bar-Oz,&nbsp;Smadar Eventov-Friedman,&nbsp;David Mankuta,&nbsp;Nurit Yirmiya","doi":"10.1155/2018/8316212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the long-term risk for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in individuals who are born preterm and full-term using both observational instruments and parental reports. Neonatal risk factors and developmental characteristics associated with ASD risk were also examined.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants included 110 preterm children (born at a gestational age of ≤ 34 weeks) and 39 full-term children assessed at ages 18, 24, and 36 months. The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised, the Social Communication Questionnaire, and the Mullen Scales of Early Learning were administered.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>The long-term risk for ASD was higher when parental reports were employed compared to observational instruments. At 18 and 24 months, a higher long-term risk for ASD was found for preterm children compared to full-term children. At 36 months, only one preterm child and one full-term child met the cutoff for ASD based on the ADOS, yet clinical judgment and parental reports supported an ASD diagnosis for the preterm child only. Earlier gestational age and lower general developmental abilities were associated with elevated ASD risk among preterm children.</p>","PeriodicalId":8659,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/8316212","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8316212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the long-term risk for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in individuals who are born preterm and full-term using both observational instruments and parental reports. Neonatal risk factors and developmental characteristics associated with ASD risk were also examined.

Method: Participants included 110 preterm children (born at a gestational age of ≤ 34 weeks) and 39 full-term children assessed at ages 18, 24, and 36 months. The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised, the Social Communication Questionnaire, and the Mullen Scales of Early Learning were administered.

Results and conclusions: The long-term risk for ASD was higher when parental reports were employed compared to observational instruments. At 18 and 24 months, a higher long-term risk for ASD was found for preterm children compared to full-term children. At 36 months, only one preterm child and one full-term child met the cutoff for ASD based on the ADOS, yet clinical judgment and parental reports supported an ASD diagnosis for the preterm child only. Earlier gestational age and lower general developmental abilities were associated with elevated ASD risk among preterm children.

Abstract Image

早产儿患ASD的风险:一项为期三年的随访研究
背景:本研究的目的是通过观察工具和父母报告来检查早产儿和足月出生的个体患自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的长期风险。新生儿的危险因素和发育特征与ASD风险也进行了检查。方法:参与者包括110名早产儿(出生时胎龄≤34周)和39名足月儿童,分别在18、24和36个月时进行评估。采用《自闭症诊断观察表》、《幼儿自闭症修正表》、《自闭症诊断访谈-修订版》、《社会沟通问卷》和《马伦早期学习量表》。结果和结论:与观察工具相比,使用父母报告的儿童患ASD的长期风险更高。在18个月和24个月时,早产儿患ASD的长期风险高于足月儿童。在36个月时,根据ADOS,只有一个早产儿和一个足月儿童符合ASD的临界值,但临床判断和父母报告仅支持早产儿的ASD诊断。较早的胎龄和较低的一般发育能力与早产儿ASD风险升高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信