First-Time Fathers' Experience of Support from Midwives in Maternity Clinics: An Interview Study.

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING
Nursing Research and Practice Pub Date : 2018-11-08 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/9618036
L Huusko, S Sjöberg, A Ekström, E Hertfelt Wahn, S Thorstensson
{"title":"First-Time Fathers' Experience of Support from Midwives in Maternity Clinics: An Interview Study.","authors":"L Huusko,&nbsp;S Sjöberg,&nbsp;A Ekström,&nbsp;E Hertfelt Wahn,&nbsp;S Thorstensson","doi":"10.1155/2018/9618036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research shows that first-time fathers want to take part in preparation for birth and parenthood but they describe being excluded by health professionals.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to illustrate first-time fathers' experiences of support from midwives in maternity clinics as a step in the validation of \"The Father Perceived-Professional-Support\" (The FaPPS) scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative content analysis with an inductive and deductive approach was used; seven first-time fathers were strategically selected and interviewed. In the inductive part the following open question was asked: \"How did you perceive the support from the antenatal midwife/midwives?\" In the deductive part, the fathers were asked to respond to the FaPPS scale, in order to receive their thoughts and understanding of the scale, inspired by the \"Think-aloud\" method.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The inductive results showed two main categories: <i>Experience of not knowing what support they needed</i> and <i>Experience of being excluded</i>. The fathers found support from other fathers in parental education classes, but they lack time to discuss. Overall it seems as if the fathers answered both from their own perspective and from the mothers' perspective. This was not evident in the deductive results. The FaPPs scale should therefore include <i>professionals' ability to strengthen social support from other first-time fathers</i> and <i>professionals' ability to offer support to the mother. Conclusion and Clinical Implications.</i> The fathers experienced exclusion both by themselves and also by midwives. Midwives should offer both parents the opportunity to pose questions. It is important for expectant fathers that time for discussion is planned in parental education classes. The FaPPS scale is useful but needs further development. Parts of our result are in line with earlier research, for decades; therefore it is necessary to focus more on support for fathers.</p>","PeriodicalId":46917,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research and Practice","volume":"2018 ","pages":"9618036"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/9618036","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9618036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Background: Research shows that first-time fathers want to take part in preparation for birth and parenthood but they describe being excluded by health professionals.

Aim: The aim of this study was to illustrate first-time fathers' experiences of support from midwives in maternity clinics as a step in the validation of "The Father Perceived-Professional-Support" (The FaPPS) scale.

Methods: A qualitative content analysis with an inductive and deductive approach was used; seven first-time fathers were strategically selected and interviewed. In the inductive part the following open question was asked: "How did you perceive the support from the antenatal midwife/midwives?" In the deductive part, the fathers were asked to respond to the FaPPS scale, in order to receive their thoughts and understanding of the scale, inspired by the "Think-aloud" method.

Findings: The inductive results showed two main categories: Experience of not knowing what support they needed and Experience of being excluded. The fathers found support from other fathers in parental education classes, but they lack time to discuss. Overall it seems as if the fathers answered both from their own perspective and from the mothers' perspective. This was not evident in the deductive results. The FaPPs scale should therefore include professionals' ability to strengthen social support from other first-time fathers and professionals' ability to offer support to the mother. Conclusion and Clinical Implications. The fathers experienced exclusion both by themselves and also by midwives. Midwives should offer both parents the opportunity to pose questions. It is important for expectant fathers that time for discussion is planned in parental education classes. The FaPPS scale is useful but needs further development. Parts of our result are in line with earlier research, for decades; therefore it is necessary to focus more on support for fathers.

初生父亲在产科诊所获得助产士支持的经验:一项访谈研究。
背景:研究表明,第一次做父亲的人想要参与准备生育和为人父母的工作,但他们说自己被卫生专业人员排除在外。目的:本研究的目的是说明第一次做父亲的人在产科诊所获得助产士支持的经历,作为验证“父亲感知-专业-支持”(FaPPS)量表的一个步骤。方法:采用归纳和演绎相结合的定性含量分析方法;有策略地挑选了7位初为人父的父亲进行访谈。在归纳部分,提出了以下开放性问题:“你如何看待产前助产士的支持?”在演绎部分,父亲们被要求回答FaPPS量表,以获得他们对量表的想法和理解,灵感来自“大声思考”方法。结果:归纳结果显示两大类:不知道自己需要什么支持的经历和被排斥的经历。这些父亲在父母教育课程上得到了其他父亲的支持,但他们缺乏时间进行讨论。总的来说,似乎父亲从自己的角度和母亲的角度都回答了这个问题。这在演绎结果中并不明显。因此,FaPPs量表应包括专业人士加强其他初为人父的社会支持的能力,以及专业人士为母亲提供支持的能力。结论及临床意义。父亲们经历了自己和助产士的排斥。助产士应该给父母双方提出问题的机会。对于准爸爸来说,在父母教育课程中安排讨论的时间是很重要的。FaPPS量表是有用的,但需要进一步发展。我们的部分结果与几十年来的早期研究一致;因此,有必要更多地关注对父亲的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信