Ann E Glang, Melissa McCart, Jody Slocumb, Jeff M Gau, Susan C Davies, Doug Gomez, Laura Beck
{"title":"Preliminary Efficacy of Online Traumatic Brain Injury Professional Development for Educators: An Exploratory Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Ann E Glang, Melissa McCart, Jody Slocumb, Jeff M Gau, Susan C Davies, Doug Gomez, Laura Beck","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the efficacy of an online traumatic brain injury (TBI) professional development intervention, In the Classroom After Concussion: Best Practices for Student Success.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized controlled trial with a sample of 100 general educators, who were randomly assigned to the In the Classroom Web site (treatment group) or the LEARNet Web site (control group). Participants completed the pretest, accessed the In the Classroom or LEARNet site and the posttest and completed follow-up assessments 60 days after posttest.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>(1) Knowledge of effective strategies for working with students with TBI; (2) knowledge application; (3) self-efficacy in handling situations presented in text and video scenarios, and (4) a standardized self-efficacy measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the posttest assessment, In the Classroom educators showed significantly greater gains in knowledge (P < .0001, d = 1.36 [large effect]), TBI knowledge application (P = .0261, d = 0.46), and general self-efficacy (P = .0106, d = 0.39) than the LEARNet controls. In the Classroom educators maintained significant gains in knowledge (P = .001, d = 0.82) and general self-efficacy (P = .018, d = 0.38) but not in TBI knowledge application (P = .921, d = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the prevalence of TBI, it is important to develop evidence-based, cost-effective approaches to knowledge transfer and exchange in TBI professional development. In the Classroom is one such approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":519229,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"77-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000447","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
Objective: To examine the efficacy of an online traumatic brain injury (TBI) professional development intervention, In the Classroom After Concussion: Best Practices for Student Success.
Design: A randomized controlled trial with a sample of 100 general educators, who were randomly assigned to the In the Classroom Web site (treatment group) or the LEARNet Web site (control group). Participants completed the pretest, accessed the In the Classroom or LEARNet site and the posttest and completed follow-up assessments 60 days after posttest.
Measures: (1) Knowledge of effective strategies for working with students with TBI; (2) knowledge application; (3) self-efficacy in handling situations presented in text and video scenarios, and (4) a standardized self-efficacy measure.
Results: On the posttest assessment, In the Classroom educators showed significantly greater gains in knowledge (P < .0001, d = 1.36 [large effect]), TBI knowledge application (P = .0261, d = 0.46), and general self-efficacy (P = .0106, d = 0.39) than the LEARNet controls. In the Classroom educators maintained significant gains in knowledge (P = .001, d = 0.82) and general self-efficacy (P = .018, d = 0.38) but not in TBI knowledge application (P = .921, d = 0.02).
Conclusion: Given the prevalence of TBI, it is important to develop evidence-based, cost-effective approaches to knowledge transfer and exchange in TBI professional development. In the Classroom is one such approach.
目的:探讨在线创伤性脑损伤(TBI)专业发展干预的效果,在脑震荡后的课堂上:学生成功的最佳实践。设计:对100名普通教育工作者进行随机对照试验,他们被随机分配到课堂网站(实验组)或LEARNet网站(对照组)。参与者完成了前测,访问了In the Classroom或LEARNet网站和后测,并在后测后60天完成了后续评估。措施:(1)了解与TBI学生合作的有效策略;(2)知识应用;(3)文本和视频场景情景处理的自我效能感;(4)标准化的自我效能感测量。结果:在测试后评估中,课堂教育工作者在知识(P < 0.0001, d = 1.36[大效应])、TBI知识应用(P = 0.0261, d = 0.46)和一般自我效能(P = 0.0106, d = 0.39)方面的收益显著高于LEARNet对照组。在课堂上,教育者在知识(P = 0.001, d = 0.82)和总体自我效能感(P = 0.018, d = 0.38)方面保持显著增长,但在TBI知识应用方面没有显著增长(P = 0.921, d = 0.02)。结论:鉴于创伤性脑损伤的普遍存在,在创伤性脑损伤专业发展中,开发基于证据的、具有成本效益的知识转移和交流方法非常重要。在教室里就是这样一种方法。