Perspectives of New York State Dental Residency Directors on Licensure by Residency.

Abstract

In 2003, New York State enacted legislation that allowed graduating dentists to undertake a one-year postgraduate residency in place of a licensure exam. In 2007, it became mandated throughout the state. This was a paradigm shift for the dental community, and overall opinions varied widely on the topic. On one side, proponents of a board exam claim that the point of dental school is to produce competent practitioners and weed out those who would be dangerous to the practice of dentistry. Contrarily, proponents of residency see the need for further evaluation and assessment of practitioners in order to even understand their levels of competence. In the current residency model of licensure, it is up to attending dentists and residency directors to deem the dentists ready to practice. At this point, there is no standard way of assessing residents, nor are there any guidelines as to what should be used to assess prospective dentists. This puts a lot of responsibility on specific directors to decide what is appropriate in their own situation. The purpose of this survey was to collect and assess residency directors' perspectives on the current licensure model of a residency. The survey response rate was 57% of all residency directors in New York State. The results show how the biggest stakeholders view their role in licensure, what levels of assessment they use and what improvements they would choose to utilize if available.