A Comparison of 2 Online Parent Skills Training Interventions for Early Childhood Brain Injury: Improvements in Internalizing and Executive Function Behaviors.

Jessica M Aguilar, Amy E Cassedy, Emily L Shultz, Michael W Kirkwood, Terry Stancin, Keith Owen Yeates, H Gerry Taylor, Shari L Wade
{"title":"A Comparison of 2 Online Parent Skills Training Interventions for Early Childhood Brain Injury: Improvements in Internalizing and Executive Function Behaviors.","authors":"Jessica M Aguilar,&nbsp;Amy E Cassedy,&nbsp;Emily L Shultz,&nbsp;Michael W Kirkwood,&nbsp;Terry Stancin,&nbsp;Keith Owen Yeates,&nbsp;H Gerry Taylor,&nbsp;Shari L Wade","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effectiveness of a web-based parenting intervention (Internet-Based Interacting Together Everyday: Recovery After Childhood TBI [I-InTERACT]) and an abbreviated version (Express) in reducing executive dysfunction and internalizing problems among young children following traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Parents of 113 children (ages 3-9 years) who had sustained a TBI were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups: I-InTERACT, Express, or an Internet Resource Comparison (IRC) group. Parents who participated in either I-InTERACT or Express completed self-guided web sessions and received live coaching of their parenting skills via videoconferencing with a therapist. I-InTERACT included additional psychoeducation, stress management, and family communication skills (eg, marriage, grief, pain, and sleep). Analyses of covariance were utilized to compare the groups on parent-reported executive function behaviors (ie, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function) and internalizing symptoms (ie, Child Behavior Checklist) at baseline and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parents who participated in Express reported significantly lower levels of executive dysfunction than those in I-InTERACT, β = -0.49; t(2, 73) = -2.47, P = .048, and significantly lower levels of withdrawal than those in the IRC group, β = -0.44; t(2, 74) = -2.22, P = .03. The Express group did not significantly differ from the IRC group on executive function behaviors or the I-InTERACT group on internalizing problems, all P > .05. Children with more problems at baseline, families with lower education levels, and parents with more symptoms of depression benefited most.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A brief, online parent training intervention may be efficacious in improving executive dysfunction and internalizing problems following early TBI, particularly among children of lower socioeconomic status or with existing behavioral concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":519229,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"65-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000443","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of a web-based parenting intervention (Internet-Based Interacting Together Everyday: Recovery After Childhood TBI [I-InTERACT]) and an abbreviated version (Express) in reducing executive dysfunction and internalizing problems among young children following traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Method: Parents of 113 children (ages 3-9 years) who had sustained a TBI were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups: I-InTERACT, Express, or an Internet Resource Comparison (IRC) group. Parents who participated in either I-InTERACT or Express completed self-guided web sessions and received live coaching of their parenting skills via videoconferencing with a therapist. I-InTERACT included additional psychoeducation, stress management, and family communication skills (eg, marriage, grief, pain, and sleep). Analyses of covariance were utilized to compare the groups on parent-reported executive function behaviors (ie, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function) and internalizing symptoms (ie, Child Behavior Checklist) at baseline and 6 months.

Results: Parents who participated in Express reported significantly lower levels of executive dysfunction than those in I-InTERACT, β = -0.49; t(2, 73) = -2.47, P = .048, and significantly lower levels of withdrawal than those in the IRC group, β = -0.44; t(2, 74) = -2.22, P = .03. The Express group did not significantly differ from the IRC group on executive function behaviors or the I-InTERACT group on internalizing problems, all P > .05. Children with more problems at baseline, families with lower education levels, and parents with more symptoms of depression benefited most.

Conclusion: A brief, online parent training intervention may be efficacious in improving executive dysfunction and internalizing problems following early TBI, particularly among children of lower socioeconomic status or with existing behavioral concerns.

两种在线父母技能训练干预儿童早期脑损伤的比较:内化和执行功能行为的改善。
目的:探讨基于网络的父母干预(Internet-Based interaction Together Everyday: Recovery After Childhood TBI [I-InTERACT])和缩写形式(Express)在减少创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后幼儿执行功能障碍和内化问题方面的有效性。方法:113名(3-9岁)遭受TBI的儿童的父母被随机分配到3个治疗组中的一个:I-InTERACT, Express或Internet Resource Comparison (IRC)组。参加I-InTERACT或Express的父母完成了自我指导的网络课程,并通过与治疗师的视频会议接受了育儿技巧的现场指导。I-InTERACT包括额外的心理教育、压力管理和家庭沟通技巧(如婚姻、悲伤、痛苦和睡眠)。采用协方差分析比较各组在基线和6个月时父母报告的执行功能行为(即执行功能行为评定量表)和内化症状(即儿童行为检查表)。结果:参加Express的家长报告的执行功能障碍水平显著低于I-InTERACT组,β = -0.49;t(2,73) = -2.47, P = 0.048,戒断水平显著低于IRC组,β = -0.44;t(2,74) = -2.22, P = .03。Express组与IRC组在执行功能行为和I-InTERACT组在内化问题上均无显著差异,P均> 0.05。基线问题较多的儿童、受教育程度较低的家庭以及有较多抑郁症状的父母受益最多。结论:简短的在线父母培训干预可能有效改善早期TBI后的执行功能障碍和内化问题,特别是对社会经济地位较低或存在行为问题的儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书