Paul Y Takahashi, Gregory D Jenkins, Benjamin P Welkie, Shannon K McDonnell, Jared M Evans, James R Cerhan, Janet E Olson, Stephen N Thibodeau, Mine S Cicek, Euijung Ryu
{"title":"Association of mitochondrial DNA copy number with self-rated health status.","authors":"Paul Y Takahashi, Gregory D Jenkins, Benjamin P Welkie, Shannon K McDonnell, Jared M Evans, James R Cerhan, Janet E Olson, Stephen N Thibodeau, Mine S Cicek, Euijung Ryu","doi":"10.2147/TACG.S167640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In aging adults, mitochondrial dysfunction may be an important contributor. We evaluated the association between mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number, which is a biomarker for mitochondrial function, and self-rated health status.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients enrolled within the Mayo Clinic Biobank. We utilized the questionnaire and sequence data from 944 patients. We examined the association between mtDNA copy number and self-rated health status with 3 collapsed categories for the latter variable (excellent/very good, good, and fair/poor). For analysis, we used proportional odds models after log-transforming mtDNA copy number, and we adjusted for age and sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found the median age at enrollment was 61 years (25th-75th percentile: 51-71), and 64% reported excellent or very good health, 31% reported good health, and 6% reported fair/poor health. Overall, the median mtDNA copy number was 88.9 (25th-75th percentile: 77.6-101.1). Higher mtDNA copy number was found for subjects reporting better self-rated health status after adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidity burden (OR =2.3 [95% CI: 1.2-4.5] for having better self-rated health for a one-unit increase in log-transformed mtDNA copy number).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that a higher mtDNA copy number is associated with better self-rated health status after adjustment for age, sex, and comorbidity burden. The current study implies that mtDNA copy number may serve as a biomarker for self-reported health. Further studies, potentially including cohort studies, may be required.</p>","PeriodicalId":506374,"journal":{"name":"The Application of Clinical Genetics","volume":"11 ","pages":"121-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/TACG.S167640","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Application of Clinical Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S167640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Purpose: In aging adults, mitochondrial dysfunction may be an important contributor. We evaluated the association between mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number, which is a biomarker for mitochondrial function, and self-rated health status.
Patients and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients enrolled within the Mayo Clinic Biobank. We utilized the questionnaire and sequence data from 944 patients. We examined the association between mtDNA copy number and self-rated health status with 3 collapsed categories for the latter variable (excellent/very good, good, and fair/poor). For analysis, we used proportional odds models after log-transforming mtDNA copy number, and we adjusted for age and sex.
Results: We found the median age at enrollment was 61 years (25th-75th percentile: 51-71), and 64% reported excellent or very good health, 31% reported good health, and 6% reported fair/poor health. Overall, the median mtDNA copy number was 88.9 (25th-75th percentile: 77.6-101.1). Higher mtDNA copy number was found for subjects reporting better self-rated health status after adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidity burden (OR =2.3 [95% CI: 1.2-4.5] for having better self-rated health for a one-unit increase in log-transformed mtDNA copy number).
Conclusion: We found that a higher mtDNA copy number is associated with better self-rated health status after adjustment for age, sex, and comorbidity burden. The current study implies that mtDNA copy number may serve as a biomarker for self-reported health. Further studies, potentially including cohort studies, may be required.