Stereotactic radiosurgery practice patterns for brain metastases in the United States: a national survey.

Journal of radiation oncology Pub Date : 2018-09-01 Epub Date: 2018-05-11 DOI:10.1007/s13566-018-0353-8
Erik Scott Blomain, Hyun Kim, Shivank Garg, Deepak Bhamidipati, Jenny Guo, Ingrid Kalchman, John McAna, Wenyin Shi
{"title":"Stereotactic radiosurgery practice patterns for brain metastases in the United States: a national survey.","authors":"Erik Scott Blomain,&nbsp;Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Shivank Garg,&nbsp;Deepak Bhamidipati,&nbsp;Jenny Guo,&nbsp;Ingrid Kalchman,&nbsp;John McAna,&nbsp;Wenyin Shi","doi":"10.1007/s13566-018-0353-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as an important modality for the treatment of intracranial metastases. There are currently few established guidelines delineating indications for SRS use and fewer still regarding plan evaluation in the treatment of multiple brain metastases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An 18 question electronic survey was distributed to radiation oncologists at National Cancer Institute (NCI) designated cancer centers in the USA (60). Centers without radiation oncologists were excluded. Physicians who indicated that they do not prescribe SRS were excluded from the remaining survey questions. Sign test and Chi-square test were used to determine if responses differed significantly from random distribution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixteen of the 697 radiation oncologists surveyed completed the questionnaire, representing 51 institutions. Sixty-two percent reported treating patients with brain metastases using SRS. Radiation oncologists prescribing SRS most commonly treat CNS (66.2%) and lung (49.3%) malignancies. SRS was used more frequently for < 10 brain metastases (73.7%; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for > 10 brain metastases (82.5%; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The maximum number of lesions physicians were willing to treat with SRS without WBRT was 1-4 (40.4%) and 5-10 (42.4%) (<i>p</i> < 0.0001 compared to 11-15, 16-20 and no limit). The most important criteria for choosing SRS or WBRT were number of lesions (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and performance status (<i>p</i> = 0.016). The most common margin for SRS was 0 mm (49.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.0021). The most common dose constraints other than critical structure was conformity index (84.2%) and brain V12 (61.4%). The LINAC was the most common treatment modality (54.4%) and mono-isocenter technique for multiple brain metastases was commonly used (43.9%; <i>p</i> = 0.23). Most departments do not have a policy for brain metastases treatment (64.9%; <i>p</i> = 0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is one of the first national surveys assessing the use of SRS for brain metastases in clinical practice. These data highlight some clinical considerations for physicians treating brain metastases with SRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":89815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiation oncology","volume":"7 3","pages":"241-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s13566-018-0353-8","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiation oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-018-0353-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as an important modality for the treatment of intracranial metastases. There are currently few established guidelines delineating indications for SRS use and fewer still regarding plan evaluation in the treatment of multiple brain metastases.

Methods: An 18 question electronic survey was distributed to radiation oncologists at National Cancer Institute (NCI) designated cancer centers in the USA (60). Centers without radiation oncologists were excluded. Physicians who indicated that they do not prescribe SRS were excluded from the remaining survey questions. Sign test and Chi-square test were used to determine if responses differed significantly from random distribution.

Results: One hundred sixteen of the 697 radiation oncologists surveyed completed the questionnaire, representing 51 institutions. Sixty-two percent reported treating patients with brain metastases using SRS. Radiation oncologists prescribing SRS most commonly treat CNS (66.2%) and lung (49.3%) malignancies. SRS was used more frequently for < 10 brain metastases (73.7%; p < 0.0001) and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for > 10 brain metastases (82.5%; p < 0.0001). The maximum number of lesions physicians were willing to treat with SRS without WBRT was 1-4 (40.4%) and 5-10 (42.4%) (p < 0.0001 compared to 11-15, 16-20 and no limit). The most important criteria for choosing SRS or WBRT were number of lesions (p < 0.0001) and performance status (p = 0.016). The most common margin for SRS was 0 mm (49.1%; p = 0.0021). The most common dose constraints other than critical structure was conformity index (84.2%) and brain V12 (61.4%). The LINAC was the most common treatment modality (54.4%) and mono-isocenter technique for multiple brain metastases was commonly used (43.9%; p = 0.23). Most departments do not have a policy for brain metastases treatment (64.9%; p = 0.024).

Conclusions: This is one of the first national surveys assessing the use of SRS for brain metastases in clinical practice. These data highlight some clinical considerations for physicians treating brain metastases with SRS.

美国脑转移的立体定向放射外科实践模式:一项全国性调查。
背景:立体定向放射外科(SRS)已成为治疗颅内转移瘤的一种重要方式。目前很少有确定的指南描述SRS的适应症,关于多发性脑转移治疗的计划评估的指南更少。方法:向美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)指定的癌症中心的放射肿瘤学家分发了一份包含18个问题的电子调查(60)。没有放射肿瘤学家的中心被排除在外。指出他们不开SRS的医生被排除在剩余的调查问题之外。采用符号检验和卡方检验来确定反应是否与随机分布有显著差异。结果:接受调查的697名放射肿瘤学家中有116名完成了问卷,代表51家机构。62%的人报告使用SRS治疗脑转移患者。放射肿瘤学家最常开SRS治疗中枢神经系统(66.2%)和肺部(49.3%)恶性肿瘤。SRS更常用于< 10的脑转移(73.7%;p < 0.0001)和全脑放疗(WBRT)治疗> 10个脑转移瘤(82.5%;P < 0.0001)。医生愿意使用无WBRT的SRS治疗的最大病变数为1-4(40.4%)和5-10 (42.4%)(p < 0.0001,而11-15、16-20和无限制)。选择SRS或WBRT的最重要标准是病变数量(p < 0.0001)和表现状态(p = 0.016)。SRS最常见的切缘为0 mm (49.1%;P = 0.0021)。除关键结构外,最常见的剂量限制是符合性指数(84.2%)和脑V12(61.4%)。LINAC是最常见的治疗方式(54.4%),单等中心技术用于多发性脑转移(43.9%;P = 0.23)。大多数科室没有脑转移治疗政策(64.9%;P = 0.024)。结论:这是在临床实践中评估SRS在脑转移中的应用的首批全国性调查之一。这些数据强调了医生使用SRS治疗脑转移瘤的一些临床考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书