Seong Hwan Kim, JungTae Ahn, Tae Wook Kim, Kang-Il Kim, Sang Hak Lee
{"title":"Midbody of the medial meniscus as a reference of preservation in partial meniscectomy for complete discoid lateral meniscus.","authors":"Seong Hwan Kim, JungTae Ahn, Tae Wook Kim, Kang-Il Kim, Sang Hak Lee","doi":"10.1007/s00167-018-5268-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the postoperative size of discoid lateral meniscus using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after partial meniscectomy relative to the size of medial meniscus midbody.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 48 patients who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy with or without repair for symptomatic complete discoid meniscus. The intraoperative size of midbody of medial meniscus was used as a reference for partial meniscectomy. MRIs were performed pre- and postoperatively. Quantitative evaluations of the height, width, extrusion of the meniscus, and relative percentage of extrusion in the coronal and sagittal planes were completed. Demographic data, preoperative shift, type of shift, and operative technique were analyzed while considering the remaining meniscus. Logistic regression analyses were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean remaining discoid meniscal width in the coronal plane of MRI was not significantly different from the width of midbody of medial meniscus (9.1 ± 4.2 mm vs. 9.4 ± 1.4 mm, n.s.) Absolute meniscal extrusion and relative percentage of extrusion in the coronal plane and the ratio of t meniscus in sagittal plane of the final MRI were significantly increased as compared with the preoperative MRI. Preoperative shift was a risk factor for the reduction of remaining meniscal width (odds ratio 11.997, p = 0.016, 95% CI 1.586-90.737).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The size of midbody of medial meniscus could be a reference for partial meniscectomy in symptomatic complete discoid meniscus. Preoperative shift represents a risk factor for decreased remaining meniscal width. These findings could be helpful in ensuring appropriate surgical planning and explaining poor prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prospective cohort study, Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":"2558-2567"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00167-018-5268-9","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5268-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the postoperative size of discoid lateral meniscus using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after partial meniscectomy relative to the size of medial meniscus midbody.
Methods: This study included 48 patients who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy with or without repair for symptomatic complete discoid meniscus. The intraoperative size of midbody of medial meniscus was used as a reference for partial meniscectomy. MRIs were performed pre- and postoperatively. Quantitative evaluations of the height, width, extrusion of the meniscus, and relative percentage of extrusion in the coronal and sagittal planes were completed. Demographic data, preoperative shift, type of shift, and operative technique were analyzed while considering the remaining meniscus. Logistic regression analyses were used.
Results: The mean remaining discoid meniscal width in the coronal plane of MRI was not significantly different from the width of midbody of medial meniscus (9.1 ± 4.2 mm vs. 9.4 ± 1.4 mm, n.s.) Absolute meniscal extrusion and relative percentage of extrusion in the coronal plane and the ratio of t meniscus in sagittal plane of the final MRI were significantly increased as compared with the preoperative MRI. Preoperative shift was a risk factor for the reduction of remaining meniscal width (odds ratio 11.997, p = 0.016, 95% CI 1.586-90.737).
Conclusion: The size of midbody of medial meniscus could be a reference for partial meniscectomy in symptomatic complete discoid meniscus. Preoperative shift represents a risk factor for decreased remaining meniscal width. These findings could be helpful in ensuring appropriate surgical planning and explaining poor prognostic factors.
Level of evidence: Prospective cohort study, Level II.
目的:应用磁共振成像(MRI)评价半月板部分切除术后盘状外侧半月板相对于内侧半月板中体的大小。方法:本研究纳入48例经关节镜半月板部分切除术治疗症状性完全盘状半月板的患者。术中以内侧半月板中段大小作为半月板部分切除术的参考。术前、术后均行mri检查。完成了半月板高度、宽度、挤压程度以及冠状面和矢状面相对挤压率的定量评估。在考虑剩余半月板的情况下,分析了人口统计学资料、术前移位、移位类型和手术技术。采用Logistic回归分析。结果:MRI冠状面盘状半月板平均剩余宽度与内侧半月板中间体宽度无显著差异(9.1±4.2 mm vs. 9.4±1.4 mm, n.s)。与术前相比,最终MRI半月板绝对挤压、冠状面相对挤压百分比、矢状面t半月板比例均明显增加。术前移位是减少剩余半月板宽度的危险因素(优势比11.997,p = 0.016, 95% CI 1.586-90.737)。结论:对于有症状的完全盘状半月板,内侧半月板中段的大小可作为半月板部分切除术的参考。术前移位是剩余半月板宽度减小的一个危险因素。这些发现可能有助于确保适当的手术计划和解释不良预后因素。证据等级:前瞻性队列研究,II级。