Complications and technical failures are rare in knee ligament reconstruction: analyses based on 31,326 reconstructions during 10 years in Denmark.

Daniel Rayan Kalakech Munch, Thomas Irgens Hansen, Kim Lyngby Mikkelsen, Michael Rindom Krogsgaard
{"title":"Complications and technical failures are rare in knee ligament reconstruction: analyses based on 31,326 reconstructions during 10 years in Denmark.","authors":"Daniel Rayan Kalakech Munch,&nbsp;Thomas Irgens Hansen,&nbsp;Kim Lyngby Mikkelsen,&nbsp;Michael Rindom Krogsgaard","doi":"10.1007/s00167-018-5297-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Knowledge about treatment injuries (technical failures and complications) in relation to knee ligament reconstructions is sparse. Our purpose was to describe treatment injuries to knee ligament reconstruction in Denmark during a 10-year period and to suggest initiatives to reduce the risk for treatment injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Treatment injuries after knee ligament reconstructions reported to the Danish Patient Compensation Association (DPCA) 2005-2014 were analyzed and compared to information from the Danish Kneeligament Reconstruction Register and Danish National Patient Register.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of knee ligament reconstructions in Denmark 2005-2014, including revisions, was 31,326. Of the 704 cases claimed to DPCA, 371 were approved as treatment injuries (1.42% of all operations). Tunnel malpositioning (135 = 0.43% of all operations), deep infection (0.27%), nerve injury (0.17%), pain (0.12%) and unrecognized combined instability (0.11%) were the most common. Patients operated with anteromedial technique for femoral tunnel placement had a lower incidence (p < 0.0001) of tunnel malpositioning compared to other techniques. Public and private hospitals had the same risk of treatment injures. Hospitals that performed the largest number of reconstructions/year had the smallest risk of a treatment injury (p < 0.001). The total compensation was 7.6 m EURO, which equals 243 EURO/performed knee ligament reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment injuries as defined in this study were rare, with tunnel malpositioning being the most common. Analyses of the results indicate that it may be clinically relevant to reduce the number of treatment injures that knee ligament reconstructions are concentrated in clinics with high volume. Also, malpositioning might be reduced by routine documentation of K-wire position before tunnels are drilled.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":"2672-2679"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00167-018-5297-4","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5297-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: Knowledge about treatment injuries (technical failures and complications) in relation to knee ligament reconstructions is sparse. Our purpose was to describe treatment injuries to knee ligament reconstruction in Denmark during a 10-year period and to suggest initiatives to reduce the risk for treatment injuries.

Methods: Treatment injuries after knee ligament reconstructions reported to the Danish Patient Compensation Association (DPCA) 2005-2014 were analyzed and compared to information from the Danish Kneeligament Reconstruction Register and Danish National Patient Register.

Results: The number of knee ligament reconstructions in Denmark 2005-2014, including revisions, was 31,326. Of the 704 cases claimed to DPCA, 371 were approved as treatment injuries (1.42% of all operations). Tunnel malpositioning (135 = 0.43% of all operations), deep infection (0.27%), nerve injury (0.17%), pain (0.12%) and unrecognized combined instability (0.11%) were the most common. Patients operated with anteromedial technique for femoral tunnel placement had a lower incidence (p < 0.0001) of tunnel malpositioning compared to other techniques. Public and private hospitals had the same risk of treatment injures. Hospitals that performed the largest number of reconstructions/year had the smallest risk of a treatment injury (p < 0.001). The total compensation was 7.6 m EURO, which equals 243 EURO/performed knee ligament reconstruction.

Conclusion: Treatment injuries as defined in this study were rare, with tunnel malpositioning being the most common. Analyses of the results indicate that it may be clinically relevant to reduce the number of treatment injures that knee ligament reconstructions are concentrated in clinics with high volume. Also, malpositioning might be reduced by routine documentation of K-wire position before tunnels are drilled.

Level of evidence: III.

膝关节韧带重建的并发症和技术失败是罕见的:基于丹麦10年来31,326例重建的分析。
目的:关于膝关节韧带重建的治疗损伤(技术失误和并发症)的知识很少。我们的目的是描述丹麦10年间膝关节韧带重建的治疗损伤,并提出降低治疗损伤风险的措施。方法:分析2005-2014年丹麦患者补偿协会(DPCA)报告的膝关节韧带重建后的治疗损伤,并与丹麦膝关节重建登记和丹麦国家患者登记的信息进行比较。结果:丹麦2005-2014年膝关节韧带重建(包括修复)的数量为31,326例。在704例DPCA中,371例被批准为治疗性损伤(占所有手术的1.42%)。隧道错位(135例= 0.43%)、深部感染(0.27%)、神经损伤(0.17%)、疼痛(0.12%)和未被识别的联合不稳定(0.11%)最为常见。采用前内侧技术置入股骨隧道的患者发生率较低(p)。结论:本研究定义的治疗性损伤很少见,隧道错位是最常见的。分析结果表明,膝关节韧带重建集中在高容量的诊所,可能与减少治疗损伤的数量有临床意义。此外,在隧道钻进之前,通过对k线位置进行常规记录,可以减少定位错误。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信