Steep lateral tibial slope and lateral-to-medial slope asymmetry are risk factors for concomitant posterolateral meniscus root tears in anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Rainer Kolbe, Andrés Schmidt-Hebbel, Philipp Forkel, Jonas Pogorzelski, Andreas B Imhoff, Matthias J Feucht
{"title":"Steep lateral tibial slope and lateral-to-medial slope asymmetry are risk factors for concomitant posterolateral meniscus root tears in anterior cruciate ligament injuries.","authors":"Rainer Kolbe,&nbsp;Andrés Schmidt-Hebbel,&nbsp;Philipp Forkel,&nbsp;Jonas Pogorzelski,&nbsp;Andreas B Imhoff,&nbsp;Matthias J Feucht","doi":"10.1007/s00167-018-5279-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare sagittal and coronal tibial slopes between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured subjects with and without posterolateral meniscus root tear (PLRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A chart review was conducted to identify patients with isolated ACL tears and patients with an associated PLRT. Patients with other concomitant injuries and patients who underwent surgery > 6 months after the injury were excluded. Magnetic resonance image data were used to compare the medial and lateral sagittal tibial slope (MTS and LTS), lateral-to-medial slope asymmetry (LTS-MTS), and coronal slope of the tibial plateau between both groups. Mean LTS and standard deviation (SD) of the control group were calculated, and a value of > mean + 1 SD was considered an abnormal LTS. Interobserver reproducibility was assessed by calculating interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of measurements independently obtained by two reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine patients met the in- and exclusion criteria. Thirty nine (66%) had an isolated ACL tear and 20 (34%) had an associated PLRT. Interrater ICCs for LTS, MTS, and coronal slope were 0.930, 0.884 and 0.825, respectively, representing good to excellent interobserver reproducibility. Patients with a PLRT had significantly steeper LTS (8.0 ± 3.2 vs. 4.0 ± 2.0; p < 0.001) and significantly greater difference of LTS-MTS (3.7 ± 2.9 vs. - 0.6 ± 2.0; p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with abnormal LTS were significantly overrepresented among patients with PLRT (70% vs. 18%; p < 0.001). No significant difference between both groups was found for MTS and coronal slope.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A steep lateral tibial slope and lateral-to-medial slope asymmetry are risk factors for concomitant PLRT in ACL-injured subjects.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV, retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":"2585-2591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00167-018-5279-6","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5279-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

Purpose: To compare sagittal and coronal tibial slopes between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured subjects with and without posterolateral meniscus root tear (PLRT).

Methods: A chart review was conducted to identify patients with isolated ACL tears and patients with an associated PLRT. Patients with other concomitant injuries and patients who underwent surgery > 6 months after the injury were excluded. Magnetic resonance image data were used to compare the medial and lateral sagittal tibial slope (MTS and LTS), lateral-to-medial slope asymmetry (LTS-MTS), and coronal slope of the tibial plateau between both groups. Mean LTS and standard deviation (SD) of the control group were calculated, and a value of > mean + 1 SD was considered an abnormal LTS. Interobserver reproducibility was assessed by calculating interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of measurements independently obtained by two reviewers.

Results: Fifty-nine patients met the in- and exclusion criteria. Thirty nine (66%) had an isolated ACL tear and 20 (34%) had an associated PLRT. Interrater ICCs for LTS, MTS, and coronal slope were 0.930, 0.884 and 0.825, respectively, representing good to excellent interobserver reproducibility. Patients with a PLRT had significantly steeper LTS (8.0 ± 3.2 vs. 4.0 ± 2.0; p < 0.001) and significantly greater difference of LTS-MTS (3.7 ± 2.9 vs. - 0.6 ± 2.0; p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with abnormal LTS were significantly overrepresented among patients with PLRT (70% vs. 18%; p < 0.001). No significant difference between both groups was found for MTS and coronal slope.

Conclusion: A steep lateral tibial slope and lateral-to-medial slope asymmetry are risk factors for concomitant PLRT in ACL-injured subjects.

Level of evidence: IV, retrospective cohort study.

胫骨外侧陡坡和外侧-内侧坡不对称是前交叉韧带损伤并发半月板后外侧根撕裂的危险因素。
目的:比较有无后外侧半月板根撕裂(PLRT)的前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤患者的矢状面和冠状面胫骨斜度。方法:进行了一项图表回顾,以确定孤立的ACL撕裂患者和相关的PLRT患者。排除其他合并损伤的患者和术后> 6个月的患者。利用磁共振成像数据比较两组胫骨内侧和外侧矢状面斜坡(MTS和LTS)、外侧到内侧斜坡不对称(LTS-MTS)和胫骨平台冠状面斜坡。计算对照组的平均LTS和标准差(SD), > Mean + 1 SD为异常LTS。通过计算由两名评论者独立获得的测量值的类间相关系数(ICCs)来评估观察者间的可重复性。结果:59例患者符合入组和排除标准。39例(66%)有孤立的前交叉韧带撕裂,20例(34%)有相关的PLRT。评分者间信可以为LTS、MTS和日冕斜率分别为0.930,0.884和0.825,分别代表优秀interobserver再现性。PLRT患者的LTS明显更陡(8.0±3.2 vs. 4.0±2.0);结论:胫骨外侧陡坡和外侧-内侧斜坡不对称是acl损伤患者并发PLRT的危险因素。证据水平:IV,回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信