[Adherence to and Issues on our Institutional Guidelines on Heparin Administration after Withdrawal of Warfarin before Elective Surgery].

Tomomichi Koga, Yuka Shibata, Masashi Kawamoto
{"title":"[Adherence to and Issues on our Institutional Guidelines on Heparin Administration after Withdrawal of Warfarin before Elective Surgery].","authors":"Tomomichi Koga,&nbsp;Yuka Shibata,&nbsp;Masashi Kawamoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We established local guidelines of heparin bridging therapy. However, it is unknown how adherence to our guidelines was achieved and whether our guidelines improved adherence compared with other universal guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was con- ducted on compliance with 3 recommendations in the guidelines; these are initial unfractioned heparin dose, timing of unfractioned heparin administration, and two times measurements of activated partial thromboplas- tin time (APTT). We compared 3 recommendations in the guidelines with platelet monitoring which is not described in the guidelines. We also investigated bleed- ing and thromboembolic events during heparin bridg- ing therapy according to the guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial unfractioned heparin dose, timing of unfractioned heparin administration, measurements of APTT, and platelet monitoring were concordant with the guidelines in 78.9%, 19.7%, 67.6%, and 46.5%, respectively. Bleeding events occurred in 3 cases, but no thromboembolic events occurred. Adherence to rec- ommendations for timing of unfractioned heparin administration was the lowest and significantly lower than platelet monitoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our local guidelines were partially effective to improve adherence We have to alert phy- sicians to care bleeding complications during heparin bridging therapy in our hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":18254,"journal":{"name":"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We established local guidelines of heparin bridging therapy. However, it is unknown how adherence to our guidelines was achieved and whether our guidelines improved adherence compared with other universal guidelines.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was con- ducted on compliance with 3 recommendations in the guidelines; these are initial unfractioned heparin dose, timing of unfractioned heparin administration, and two times measurements of activated partial thromboplas- tin time (APTT). We compared 3 recommendations in the guidelines with platelet monitoring which is not described in the guidelines. We also investigated bleed- ing and thromboembolic events during heparin bridg- ing therapy according to the guidelines.

Results: Initial unfractioned heparin dose, timing of unfractioned heparin administration, measurements of APTT, and platelet monitoring were concordant with the guidelines in 78.9%, 19.7%, 67.6%, and 46.5%, respectively. Bleeding events occurred in 3 cases, but no thromboembolic events occurred. Adherence to rec- ommendations for timing of unfractioned heparin administration was the lowest and significantly lower than platelet monitoring.

Conclusions: Our local guidelines were partially effective to improve adherence We have to alert phy- sicians to care bleeding complications during heparin bridging therapy in our hospital.

[选择性手术前停用华法林后肝素给药机构指南的依从性和问题]。
背景:我们建立了当地肝素桥接治疗指南。然而,目前尚不清楚我们的指南是如何得到遵守的,以及与其他通用指南相比,我们的指南是否提高了遵守。方法:对指南中3条建议的依从性进行回顾性图表回顾;这些是初始未分离肝素剂量,未分离肝素给药的时间,和两次测量活化部分血小板-时间(APTT)。我们将指南中的3项建议与指南中未描述的血小板监测进行了比较。我们也根据指南调查了肝素桥接治疗期间的出血和血栓栓塞事件。结果:未分离肝素初始剂量、未分离肝素给药时间、APTT测定和血小板监测与指南的符合率分别为78.9%、19.7%、67.6%和46.5%。3例发生出血事件,但未发生血栓栓塞事件。对肝素不分段给药时间的依从性最低,明显低于血小板监测。结论:我们的地方指南在提高依从性方面是部分有效的。我们必须提醒医生注意肝素桥接治疗期间出血并发症的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信