The association of high-intensity zones on MRI and low back pain: a systematic review.

Q1 Medicine
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders Pub Date : 2018-10-20 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13013-018-0168-9
Masatoshi Teraguchi, Rita Yim, Jason Pui-Yin Cheung, Dino Samartzis
{"title":"The association of high-intensity zones on MRI and low back pain: a systematic review.","authors":"Masatoshi Teraguchi,&nbsp;Rita Yim,&nbsp;Jason Pui-Yin Cheung,&nbsp;Dino Samartzis","doi":"10.1186/s13013-018-0168-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine is commonly used to identify the source of low back pain (LBP); however, its use has been questionable. Throughout the years, numerous lumbar phenotypes (e.g., endplate abnormalities, Modic changes, black disc) have been studied as possible pain generators. High-intensity zones (HIZs) are of particular interest as they may represent annular tears. However, for over three decades, there has been heated debate as to whether these imaging biomarkers are synonymous with LBP. Therefore, the following study addressed a systematic review of the reported literature addressing the relationship of HIZs and LBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted via MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Cochrane, PubMed, PubMed Central, EMBASE via Ovid, and Web of Science with the following search terms: \"HIZ,\" \"high intensity zone,\" or \"high intensity zones\" and \"low back pain,\" \"pain,\" \"lumbago,\" and/or \"sciatica.\" Specific exclusion criteria were also maintained. Two independent reviewers searched the literature, selected the studies, and extracted the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified six studies from our search strategy that met the inclusion criteria from a total of 756 possible studies. One cross-sectional population-based study and five comparison studies were identified, which provided information regarding the prevalence of HIZs. The prevalence of HIZs was 3 to 61% in subjects with LBP and 2 to 3% in subjects without LBP. Only three studies suggested a significant association between the presence of HIZ and LBP with or without sciatica.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our systematic review has found evidence that HIZs may be a possible risk factor for LBP; however, a mismatch of the clinical relevance of HIZs between studies still remains. The available evidence is limited by small sample size, heterogeneous study populations, and lack of standardized imaging methods for phenotyping. HIZs may be important lumbar biomarkers that demand further investigation and should be considered in the global imaging assessment of the spine, which may have immense clinical utility. Further large-scale studies with standardized imaging and classification techniques as well as the assessment of patterns of HIZs are necessary to better understand their role with LBP development.</p>","PeriodicalId":21573,"journal":{"name":"Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders","volume":"13 ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13013-018-0168-9","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-018-0168-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine is commonly used to identify the source of low back pain (LBP); however, its use has been questionable. Throughout the years, numerous lumbar phenotypes (e.g., endplate abnormalities, Modic changes, black disc) have been studied as possible pain generators. High-intensity zones (HIZs) are of particular interest as they may represent annular tears. However, for over three decades, there has been heated debate as to whether these imaging biomarkers are synonymous with LBP. Therefore, the following study addressed a systematic review of the reported literature addressing the relationship of HIZs and LBP.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted via MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Cochrane, PubMed, PubMed Central, EMBASE via Ovid, and Web of Science with the following search terms: "HIZ," "high intensity zone," or "high intensity zones" and "low back pain," "pain," "lumbago," and/or "sciatica." Specific exclusion criteria were also maintained. Two independent reviewers searched the literature, selected the studies, and extracted the data.

Results: We identified six studies from our search strategy that met the inclusion criteria from a total of 756 possible studies. One cross-sectional population-based study and five comparison studies were identified, which provided information regarding the prevalence of HIZs. The prevalence of HIZs was 3 to 61% in subjects with LBP and 2 to 3% in subjects without LBP. Only three studies suggested a significant association between the presence of HIZ and LBP with or without sciatica.

Conclusions: Our systematic review has found evidence that HIZs may be a possible risk factor for LBP; however, a mismatch of the clinical relevance of HIZs between studies still remains. The available evidence is limited by small sample size, heterogeneous study populations, and lack of standardized imaging methods for phenotyping. HIZs may be important lumbar biomarkers that demand further investigation and should be considered in the global imaging assessment of the spine, which may have immense clinical utility. Further large-scale studies with standardized imaging and classification techniques as well as the assessment of patterns of HIZs are necessary to better understand their role with LBP development.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

MRI高强度区与腰痛的关联:一项系统综述。
背景:腰椎磁共振成像(MRI)通常用于识别腰痛(LBP)的来源;然而,它的使用一直受到质疑。多年来,许多腰椎表型(如终板异常、Modic改变、黑椎间盘)被研究为可能的疼痛产生源。高强度带(HIZs)是特别有趣的,因为它们可能代表环状撕裂。然而,30多年来,关于这些成像生物标志物是否等同于LBP一直存在激烈的争论。因此,下面的研究对报道的有关HIZs和LBP关系的文献进行了系统回顾。方法:通过MEDLINE、SCOPUS、Cochrane、PubMed、PubMed Central、EMBASE via Ovid和Web of Science进行系统综述,检索词为:“HIZ”、“高强度区”或“高强度区”和“腰痛”、“疼痛”、“腰痛”和/或“坐骨神经痛”。还保留了具体的排除标准。两名独立审稿人检索文献,选择研究,提取数据。结果:我们从756项可能的研究中确定了6项符合纳入标准的研究。确定了一项基于人群的横断面研究和五项比较研究,这些研究提供了有关HIZs患病率的信息。腰痛患者中HIZs患病率为3% ~ 61%,无腰痛患者中患病率为2% ~ 3%。只有三项研究表明HIZ和腰痛有或没有坐骨神经痛之间存在显著的关联。结论:我们的系统评价发现有证据表明HIZs可能是LBP的危险因素;然而,研究之间对HIZs临床相关性的不匹配仍然存在。现有的证据受到样本量小、研究人群异质性以及缺乏标准化的表型成像方法的限制。HIZs可能是重要的腰椎生物标志物,需要进一步研究,应该在脊柱的整体成像评估中考虑,这可能具有巨大的临床应用价值。为了更好地了解HIZs在腰痛发展中的作用,有必要进一步开展大规模研究,采用标准化的成像和分类技术,以及评估HIZs的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Cessation.Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders is an open access, multidisciplinary journal that encompasses all aspects of research on prevention, diagnosis, treatment, outcomes and cost-analyses of conservative and surgical management of all spinal deformities and disorders. Both clinical and basic science reports form the cornerstone of the journal in its endeavour to provide original, primary studies as well as narrative/systematic reviews and meta-analyses to the academic community and beyond. Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders aims to provide an integrated and balanced view of cutting-edge spine research to further enhance effective collaboration among clinical spine specialists and scientists, and to ultimately improve patient outcomes based on an evidence-based spine care approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信