Postexercise hypotension as a clinical tool: a “single brick” in the wall

Q1 Medicine
Leandro C. Brito PhD , Rafael Y. Fecchio MS , Tiago Peçanha PhD , Aluisio Andrade-Lima PhD , John R. Halliwill PhD , Claudia L.M. Forjaz PhD
{"title":"Postexercise hypotension as a clinical tool: a “single brick” in the wall","authors":"Leandro C. Brito PhD ,&nbsp;Rafael Y. Fecchio MS ,&nbsp;Tiago Peçanha PhD ,&nbsp;Aluisio Andrade-Lima PhD ,&nbsp;John R. Halliwill PhD ,&nbsp;Claudia L.M. Forjaz PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jash.2018.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>After an exercise session, a reduction of blood pressure (BP) is expected, a phenomenon called postexercise hypotension (PEH). PEH as a predictor of chronic training responses for BP has been broadly explored. It suggests that when PEH occurs after each exercise sessions, its benefits may summate over time, contributing to the chronic adaptation. Thus, PEH is an important clinical tool, acting as a “single brick” in the wall, and building the chronic effect of decreasing BP. However, there is large variation in the literature regarding methodology and results, creating barriers for understanding comparisons among PEH studies. Thus, the differences among subjects' and exercise protocols’ characteristics observed in the studies investigating PEH must be considered when readers interpret the results. Furthermore, understanding of these factors of influence might be useful for avoiding misinterpretations in future comparisons and how the subjacent mechanisms contribute to the </span>BP reduction after exercise.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17220,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jash.2018.10.006","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933171118302912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

After an exercise session, a reduction of blood pressure (BP) is expected, a phenomenon called postexercise hypotension (PEH). PEH as a predictor of chronic training responses for BP has been broadly explored. It suggests that when PEH occurs after each exercise sessions, its benefits may summate over time, contributing to the chronic adaptation. Thus, PEH is an important clinical tool, acting as a “single brick” in the wall, and building the chronic effect of decreasing BP. However, there is large variation in the literature regarding methodology and results, creating barriers for understanding comparisons among PEH studies. Thus, the differences among subjects' and exercise protocols’ characteristics observed in the studies investigating PEH must be considered when readers interpret the results. Furthermore, understanding of these factors of influence might be useful for avoiding misinterpretations in future comparisons and how the subjacent mechanisms contribute to the BP reduction after exercise.

作为临床工具的运动后低血压:墙上的“一块砖”
在一次运动后,血压(BP)会降低,这种现象被称为运动后低血压(PEH)。PEH作为BP慢性训练反应的预测因子已被广泛探索。这表明,每次锻炼后发生PEH,其益处可能随着时间的推移而累积,有助于慢性适应。因此,PEH是一个重要的临床工具,作为“墙中的一块砖”,建立了降低血压的慢性效应。然而,在方法和结果方面,文献存在很大差异,这为理解PEH研究之间的比较造成了障碍。因此,在调查PEH的研究中观察到的受试者和运动方案特征之间的差异,在读者解释结果时必须考虑。此外,了解这些影响因素可能有助于避免在未来的比较中产生误解,以及了解运动后血压降低的基本机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation. The Journal of the American Society of Hypertension (JASH) publishes peer-reviewed articles on the topics of basic, applied and translational research on blood pressure, hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders and factors; as well as clinical research and clinical trials in hypertension. Original research studies, reviews, hypotheses, editorial commentary and special reports spanning the spectrum of human and experimental animal and tissue research will be considered. All research studies must have been conducted following animal welfare guidelines. Studies involving human subjects or tissues must have received approval of the appropriate institutional committee charged with oversight of human studies and informed consent must be obtained.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信