Improving STI and HIV Passive Partner Notification using the Model for Improvement: A Quality Improvement Study in Lilongwe Malawi.

M M Matoga, M C Hosseinipour, E Jere, B Ndalama, B Kamtambe, C Chasela
{"title":"Improving STI and HIV Passive Partner Notification using the Model for Improvement: A Quality Improvement Study in Lilongwe Malawi.","authors":"M M Matoga,&nbsp;M C Hosseinipour,&nbsp;E Jere,&nbsp;B Ndalama,&nbsp;B Kamtambe,&nbsp;C Chasela","doi":"10.4172/2576-1420.1000128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Malawi, passive partner notification is the mainstay method of partner notification (PN). Despite its wide use, the proportion of sexual partners referred for care through this method is very low. We aimed to increase the proportion of sexual partner referral through passive PN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a quality improvement (QI) project at Bwaila STI unit in Lilongwe, Malawi between January and June 2017 using a pre- and post- intervention quasi-experimental study design. Pre-intervention, we conducted key-informant interviews and clinic observations and used the findings to design a QI project using expert opinion. The intervention included three change ideas: early start time of the clinic, shortening of the group health talk and expedited clinic flow for sexual partners. Each change idea was tested twice through 1-week long Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles using the model for improvement (MFI) and then combined and tested twice. Process data were collected and monitored using run charts. Post-intervention, we evaluated the proportion of sexual partners who presented to the clinic, to detect a 10% increase at 95% power and α=0.05, between pre- and post-intervention periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average duration of the group health talk dropped from 56 minutes to 38 minutes and the duration of clinic stay for sexual partners reduced by 45 minutes (from 1hour 36 minutes to 51 minutes). The average clinic start time improved from 09:02 hours to 08:17 hours. The proportion of sexual partner referral increased by 37% (P=0.04) - from 15.6% to 21.4%. We observed an upward trend in the proportion of sexual partners referred in the post-intervention period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The yield of sexual partners through passive PN was improved using a simple QI intervention implemented using the MFI. However, the proportion of sexual partner referral remains suboptimal. More effort is required to increase the proportion of sexual partner referral in Malawi.</p>","PeriodicalId":92077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of infectious diseases and medicine","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2576-1420.1000128","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of infectious diseases and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2576-1420.1000128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: In Malawi, passive partner notification is the mainstay method of partner notification (PN). Despite its wide use, the proportion of sexual partners referred for care through this method is very low. We aimed to increase the proportion of sexual partner referral through passive PN.

Methods: We implemented a quality improvement (QI) project at Bwaila STI unit in Lilongwe, Malawi between January and June 2017 using a pre- and post- intervention quasi-experimental study design. Pre-intervention, we conducted key-informant interviews and clinic observations and used the findings to design a QI project using expert opinion. The intervention included three change ideas: early start time of the clinic, shortening of the group health talk and expedited clinic flow for sexual partners. Each change idea was tested twice through 1-week long Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles using the model for improvement (MFI) and then combined and tested twice. Process data were collected and monitored using run charts. Post-intervention, we evaluated the proportion of sexual partners who presented to the clinic, to detect a 10% increase at 95% power and α=0.05, between pre- and post-intervention periods.

Results: The average duration of the group health talk dropped from 56 minutes to 38 minutes and the duration of clinic stay for sexual partners reduced by 45 minutes (from 1hour 36 minutes to 51 minutes). The average clinic start time improved from 09:02 hours to 08:17 hours. The proportion of sexual partner referral increased by 37% (P=0.04) - from 15.6% to 21.4%. We observed an upward trend in the proportion of sexual partners referred in the post-intervention period.

Conclusion: The yield of sexual partners through passive PN was improved using a simple QI intervention implemented using the MFI. However, the proportion of sexual partner referral remains suboptimal. More effort is required to increase the proportion of sexual partner referral in Malawi.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用改进模型改进性传播感染和艾滋病毒被动伴侣通知:马拉维利隆圭的质量改进研究。
背景:在马拉维,被动伴侣通知是伴侣通知(PN)的主要方法。尽管这种方法被广泛使用,但通过这种方法转诊治疗的性伴侣比例非常低。我们的目的是通过被动PN增加性伴侣转诊的比例。方法:我们于2017年1月至6月在马拉维利隆圭的Bwaila STI单位实施了一项质量改进(QI)项目,采用干预前和干预后准实验研究设计。在干预前,我们进行了关键信息提供者访谈和临床观察,并利用调查结果设计了一个使用专家意见的QI项目。干预措施包括三个改变思路:提前门诊时间、缩短团体健康谈话、加快性伴侣门诊流程。每个改变想法都经过为期一周的计划-执行-研究-行动周期测试,使用改进模型(MFI),然后合并并测试两次。使用运行图表收集和监控过程数据。干预后,我们评估了到诊所就诊的性伴侣的比例,在干预前后,以95%的功率和α=0.05检测到10%的增加。结果:小组健康谈话的平均时间从56分钟减少到38分钟,性伴侣的门诊时间减少了45分钟(从1小时36分钟减少到51分钟)。平均就诊时间由09:02小时提高到08:17小时。性伴侣转诊的比例增加了37% (P=0.04)——从15.6%增加到21.4%。我们观察到,在干预后时期,性伴侣的比例呈上升趋势。结论:通过MFI实施简单的QI干预,通过被动PN性伴侣的数量得到改善。然而,性伴侣转诊的比例仍然不理想。马拉维需要作出更多努力来提高性伴侣转诊的比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信