The relationship of Charlson comorbidity index with stent restenosis and extent of coronary artery disease.

Q2 Medicine
Turgut Karabağ, Emіne Altuntaş, Belma Kalaycı, Bahar Şahіn, Mustafa Umut Somuncu, Mustafa Ozan Çakır
{"title":"The relationship of Charlson comorbidity index with stent restenosis and extent of coronary artery disease.","authors":"Turgut Karabağ,&nbsp;Emіne Altuntaş,&nbsp;Belma Kalaycı,&nbsp;Bahar Şahіn,&nbsp;Mustafa Umut Somuncu,&nbsp;Mustafa Ozan Çakır","doi":"10.1556/1646.10.2018.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of comorbid conditions [Charlson comorbidity index (CCI)] on stent restenosis who underwent coronary angioplasty earlier.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups; patients with critical restenosis [recurrent diameter stenosis >50% at the stent segment or its edges (5-mm segments adjacent to the stent) (Group 1; <i>n</i> = 53, mean age: 63.8 ± 9.9 years)] and patients with no critical restenosis [<50% obstruction (Group 2; <i>n</i> = 94, mean age: 62.1 ± 9.1 years)]. The CCI and modified CCI were used for the presence of comorbid conditions. The Gensini scoring system was used to assess the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 1 had a significantly greater CCI and modified CCI score compared to Group 2 (7.1 ± 3.7 vs. 5.6 ± 1.6, <i>p</i> = 0.006; 6.9 ± 3.6 vs. 4.5 ± 1.5, <i>p</i> = 0.008, respectively). There was a weak correlation, albeit significant, between the modified CCI score and restenosis percentage (<i>r</i> = 0.29, <i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>r</i> = 0.25, <i>p</i> = 0.003, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, the CCI score is greater among patients with stent restenosis than those without. CCI score is higher among patients with a more diffuse CAD than with a milder disease extent.</p>","PeriodicalId":45181,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Medicine and Applied Science","volume":"10 2","pages":"70-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1556/1646.10.2018.20","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Medicine and Applied Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/1646.10.2018.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of comorbid conditions [Charlson comorbidity index (CCI)] on stent restenosis who underwent coronary angioplasty earlier.

Methods: Patients were divided into two groups; patients with critical restenosis [recurrent diameter stenosis >50% at the stent segment or its edges (5-mm segments adjacent to the stent) (Group 1; n = 53, mean age: 63.8 ± 9.9 years)] and patients with no critical restenosis [<50% obstruction (Group 2; n = 94, mean age: 62.1 ± 9.1 years)]. The CCI and modified CCI were used for the presence of comorbid conditions. The Gensini scoring system was used to assess the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD).

Results: Group 1 had a significantly greater CCI and modified CCI score compared to Group 2 (7.1 ± 3.7 vs. 5.6 ± 1.6, p = 0.006; 6.9 ± 3.6 vs. 4.5 ± 1.5, p = 0.008, respectively). There was a weak correlation, albeit significant, between the modified CCI score and restenosis percentage (r = 0.29, p < 0.001; r = 0.25, p = 0.003, respectively).

Conclusions: In conclusion, the CCI score is greater among patients with stent restenosis than those without. CCI score is higher among patients with a more diffuse CAD than with a milder disease extent.

Abstract Image

Charlson合并症指数与支架再狭窄及冠状动脉病变程度的关系。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨合并症[Charlson共病指数(CCI)]对早期行冠状动脉血管成形术患者支架再狭窄的影响。方法:将患者分为两组;严重再狭窄患者[支架段或其边缘(与支架相邻的5mm段)复发直径狭窄>50%](1组;N = 53,平均年龄:63.8±9.9岁)和无危重性再狭窄患者[N = 94,平均年龄:62.1±9.1岁)]。CCI和改良的CCI用于存在合并症的情况。采用Gensini评分系统评估冠状动脉病变(CAD)程度。结果:1组CCI和改良CCI评分明显高于2组(7.1±3.7 vs. 5.6±1.6,p = 0.006;6.9±3.6和4.5±1.5,p = 0.008)。改良后的CCI评分与再狭窄百分比之间虽有统计学意义,但相关性较弱(r = 0.29, p r = 0.25, p = 0.003)。结论:支架再狭窄患者CCI评分高于支架再狭窄患者。弥漫性冠心病患者的CCI评分高于病情较轻的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Medicine and Applied Science
Interventional Medicine and Applied Science MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信