Pipeline Embolization for Salvage Treatment of Previously Stented Residual and Recurrent Cerebral Aneurysms.

Q1 Medicine
Interventional Neurology Pub Date : 2018-10-01 Epub Date: 2018-06-01 DOI:10.1159/000489018
Matthew T Bender, Chau D Vo, Bowen Jiang, Jessica K Campos, David A Zarrin, Risheng Xu, Erick M Westbroek, Justin M Caplan, Judy Huang, Rafael J Tamargo, Li-Mei Lin, Geoffrey P Colby, Alexander L Coon
{"title":"Pipeline Embolization for Salvage Treatment of Previously Stented Residual and Recurrent Cerebral Aneurysms.","authors":"Matthew T Bender,&nbsp;Chau D Vo,&nbsp;Bowen Jiang,&nbsp;Jessica K Campos,&nbsp;David A Zarrin,&nbsp;Risheng Xu,&nbsp;Erick M Westbroek,&nbsp;Justin M Caplan,&nbsp;Judy Huang,&nbsp;Rafael J Tamargo,&nbsp;Li-Mei Lin,&nbsp;Geoffrey P Colby,&nbsp;Alexander L Coon","doi":"10.1159/000489018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study assessed the safety and effectiveness of the Pipeline embolization device (PED) for persistent and recurrent aneurysms previously treated with either a vascular reconstruction device (VRD) or a flow diverter (FD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, IRB-approved database was analyzed for patients treated with PED for aneurysms previously treated with a stent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty procedures were performed on 18 patients, 11 with prior FD, 7 with VRD, and 2 previously treated with both. Overall, 15 aneurysms were saccular (75%), and size was 13.5 ± 7.6 mm. Location was internal carotid artery (ICA) in 14 cases (70%) and posterior circulation in 6 cases (30%). Average prior treatments were 1.7. Previously FD cases were re-treated at an average of 18.1 months from most recent treatment. Each case used 1 device, 82% with distal coverage and 82% with proximal coverage of prior stent. Balloon remodeling was performed in 3 cases (27%) and no in-stent thrombosis was observed. Previously VRD stent-coiled cases were re-treated at an average of 87.5 months. These cases used on average 1.9 devices, 89% with distal and 100% proximal coverage. Adjunctive coiling was performed in 1 case (11%), balloon remodeling in 5 cases (56%), and 2 cases (28%) developed thrombosis that resolved with abciximab. Re-VRD cases were longer (59.1 vs. 33.7 min, <i>p</i> = 0.02) than re-FD. Angiographic follow-up was available for 16 cases (80%). In re-FD, occlusion was complete in 56% and partial progressive in 33% at 17.1 months digital subtraction angiography. In re-VRD, occlusion was complete in 57% and partial progressive in 27% at 8.1 months. Two complications occurred (10%), including one asymptomatic cervical ICA occlusion and one stent occlusion with associated mortality (5%). Clinical follow-up was 17.8 months on average (range 0.5-51.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Salvage flow diversion for previously stented aneurysms is technically challenging but offers good prospects of aneurysm obliteration with acceptable complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":46280,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000489018","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000489018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Introduction: This study assessed the safety and effectiveness of the Pipeline embolization device (PED) for persistent and recurrent aneurysms previously treated with either a vascular reconstruction device (VRD) or a flow diverter (FD).

Methods: A prospective, IRB-approved database was analyzed for patients treated with PED for aneurysms previously treated with a stent.

Results: Twenty procedures were performed on 18 patients, 11 with prior FD, 7 with VRD, and 2 previously treated with both. Overall, 15 aneurysms were saccular (75%), and size was 13.5 ± 7.6 mm. Location was internal carotid artery (ICA) in 14 cases (70%) and posterior circulation in 6 cases (30%). Average prior treatments were 1.7. Previously FD cases were re-treated at an average of 18.1 months from most recent treatment. Each case used 1 device, 82% with distal coverage and 82% with proximal coverage of prior stent. Balloon remodeling was performed in 3 cases (27%) and no in-stent thrombosis was observed. Previously VRD stent-coiled cases were re-treated at an average of 87.5 months. These cases used on average 1.9 devices, 89% with distal and 100% proximal coverage. Adjunctive coiling was performed in 1 case (11%), balloon remodeling in 5 cases (56%), and 2 cases (28%) developed thrombosis that resolved with abciximab. Re-VRD cases were longer (59.1 vs. 33.7 min, p = 0.02) than re-FD. Angiographic follow-up was available for 16 cases (80%). In re-FD, occlusion was complete in 56% and partial progressive in 33% at 17.1 months digital subtraction angiography. In re-VRD, occlusion was complete in 57% and partial progressive in 27% at 8.1 months. Two complications occurred (10%), including one asymptomatic cervical ICA occlusion and one stent occlusion with associated mortality (5%). Clinical follow-up was 17.8 months on average (range 0.5-51.9).

Conclusions: Salvage flow diversion for previously stented aneurysms is technically challenging but offers good prospects of aneurysm obliteration with acceptable complication rates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

管道栓塞治疗先前支架化的残余及复发性脑动脉瘤。
简介:本研究评估了管道栓塞装置(PED)治疗持续性和复发性动脉瘤的安全性和有效性,之前用血管重建装置(VRD)或血流分流器(FD)治疗。方法:一个前瞻性的,经irb批准的数据库分析了先前接受过支架治疗的动脉瘤患者的PED治疗。结果:对18例患者进行了20次手术,其中11例既往患有FD, 7例患有VRD, 2例既往均接受过FD治疗。总体上,15个动脉瘤呈囊状(75%),大小为13.5±7.6 mm。颈动脉(ICA) 14例(70%),后循环6例(30%)。平均治疗前为1.7。以前的FD病例在最近一次治疗平均18.1个月后再次治疗。每个病例使用1个装置,82%覆盖远端,82%覆盖近端。3例(27%)行球囊重构,未见支架内血栓形成。先前的VRD支架卷曲病例平均在87.5个月后再次治疗。这些病例平均使用1.9个装置,89%覆盖远端,100%覆盖近端。辅助盘绕1例(11%),球囊重构5例(56%),2例(28%)血栓形成,经阿昔单抗治疗后消退。Re-VRD患者比re-FD患者时间更长(59.1分钟vs. 33.7分钟,p = 0.02)。血管造影随访16例(80%)。在17.1个月的数字减影血管造影中,re-FD中56%的患者闭塞完全,33%的患者部分进展。在re-VRD中,在8.1个月时,57%的患者完全闭塞,27%的患者部分进展。发生了2例并发症(10%),包括1例无症状颈椎ICA闭塞和1例支架闭塞,伴有相关死亡率(5%)。临床随访时间平均17.8个月(0.5 ~ 51.9个月)。结论:先前支架动脉瘤的恢复性血流转移在技术上具有挑战性,但在并发症发生率可接受的情况下为动脉瘤闭塞提供了良好的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neurology
Interventional Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信