High-Risk Features of Delayed Clinical Progression in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Proposed Prediction Score for Early Intervention.

Q1 Medicine
Interventional Neurology Pub Date : 2018-10-01 Epub Date: 2018-04-20 DOI:10.1159/000487960
Saif A Bushnaq, Fares Qeadan, Tapan Thacker, Mohammad Abbas, Andrew P Carlson
{"title":"High-Risk Features of Delayed Clinical Progression in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Proposed Prediction Score for Early Intervention.","authors":"Saif A Bushnaq,&nbsp;Fares Qeadan,&nbsp;Tapan Thacker,&nbsp;Mohammad Abbas,&nbsp;Andrew P Carlson","doi":"10.1159/000487960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anticoagulation is the mainstay treatment for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). A subset of patients might deteriorate despite anticoagulation, and in such cases, endovascular therapy is recommended.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed on subjects with CVT from January 2005 to October 2016. The primary outcome was clinical deterioration. Bivariate analysis, multiple logistic regression modeling, and linear discriminant analysis were used to determine a predictive model for deterioration; the results from these models were used to construct a CVT score in order to measure the individual likelihood of deterioration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 147 subjects with CVT. The majority were treated with anticoagulation (<i>n</i> = 109, 74.15%); 38 (25.85%) were found to have deterioration, 12 (8.16%) of whom underwent endovascular intervention. The most important risk factors of deterioration, per bivariate analysis, included decreased level of consciousness (odds ratio [OR] = 5.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.59-12.77) and papilledema (OR = 4.52; 95% CI 1.55-13.18). The final multivariable model also included CVT location score (number of sinuses involved), oral contraceptive pill use, sodium level, platelet count, and seizure activity on presentation. This model had a predictive ability to identify deterioration of 83.2%, with a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 76.2%. Patients with a CVT score of ≥5 have at least 50% chance of deterioration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Decreased mental status, seizure activity, papilledema, number of involved sinuses, as well as sodium level and platelet count are the most important factors in predicting deterioration after CVT. This group may represent a subset of patients in whom early endovascular therapy may be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":46280,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000487960","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000487960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background: Anticoagulation is the mainstay treatment for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). A subset of patients might deteriorate despite anticoagulation, and in such cases, endovascular therapy is recommended.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed on subjects with CVT from January 2005 to October 2016. The primary outcome was clinical deterioration. Bivariate analysis, multiple logistic regression modeling, and linear discriminant analysis were used to determine a predictive model for deterioration; the results from these models were used to construct a CVT score in order to measure the individual likelihood of deterioration.

Results: We identified 147 subjects with CVT. The majority were treated with anticoagulation (n = 109, 74.15%); 38 (25.85%) were found to have deterioration, 12 (8.16%) of whom underwent endovascular intervention. The most important risk factors of deterioration, per bivariate analysis, included decreased level of consciousness (odds ratio [OR] = 5.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.59-12.77) and papilledema (OR = 4.52; 95% CI 1.55-13.18). The final multivariable model also included CVT location score (number of sinuses involved), oral contraceptive pill use, sodium level, platelet count, and seizure activity on presentation. This model had a predictive ability to identify deterioration of 83.2%, with a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 76.2%. Patients with a CVT score of ≥5 have at least 50% chance of deterioration.

Conclusions: Decreased mental status, seizure activity, papilledema, number of involved sinuses, as well as sodium level and platelet count are the most important factors in predicting deterioration after CVT. This group may represent a subset of patients in whom early endovascular therapy may be considered.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

脑静脉血栓延迟临床进展的高危特征:早期干预的预测评分。
背景:抗凝是治疗脑静脉血栓形成(CVT)的主要方法。尽管抗凝治疗,仍有一部分患者病情恶化,在这种情况下,建议进行血管内治疗。方法:回顾性分析2005年1月至2016年10月间CVT患者的临床资料。主要结局为临床恶化。采用双变量分析、多元逻辑回归模型和线性判别分析确定恶化的预测模型;这些模型的结果被用来构建CVT评分,以衡量个体恶化的可能性。结果:147例CVT患者。大多数患者接受抗凝治疗(n = 109, 74.15%);38例(25.85%)出现恶化,其中12例(8.16%)行血管内介入治疗。根据双变量分析,最重要的恶化危险因素包括意识水平下降(优势比[OR] = 5.76;95%可信区间[CI] 2.59-12.77)和乳头水肿(OR = 4.52;95% ci 1.55-13.18)。最终的多变量模型还包括CVT定位评分(累及的窦数)、口服避孕药的使用、钠水平、血小板计数和发病时的癫痫活动。该模型识别恶化的预测能力为83.2%,敏感性为71.4%,特异性为76.2%。CVT评分≥5的患者至少有50%的机会恶化。结论:精神状态下降、癫痫发作活动、乳头水肿、受累窦数、钠水平和血小板计数是预测CVT后病情恶化的最重要因素。这一组可能代表了早期血管内治疗可能被考虑的患者的一个子集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neurology
Interventional Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信