Social determinants of health affecting utilisation of routine maternity services in Nepal: a narrative review of the evidence.

Reproductive Health Matters Pub Date : 2018-11-01 Epub Date: 2018-11-07 DOI:10.1080/09688080.2018.1535686
Resham Bahadur Khatri, Rajendra Karkee
{"title":"Social determinants of health affecting utilisation of routine maternity services in Nepal: a narrative review of the evidence.","authors":"Resham Bahadur Khatri,&nbsp;Rajendra Karkee","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2018.1535686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nepal has one of the highest maternal and neonatal mortality rates among low- and middle-income countries. Nepal's health system focuses on life-saving interventions provided during the antenatal to postpartum period. However, the inequality in the uptake of maternity services is of major concern. This study aimed to synthesise evidence from the literature regarding the social determinants of health on the use of maternity services in Nepal. We conducted a structured narrative review of studies published from 1994 to 2016. We searched five databases: PubMed; CINAHL; EMBASE; ProQuest and Global Index Medicus using search terms covering four domains: access and use; equity determinants; routine maternity services and Nepal. The findings of the studies were summarised using the World Health Organization's Social Determinants of Health framework. A total of 59 studies were reviewed. A range of socio-structural and intermediary-level determinants was identified, either as facilitating factors, or as barriers, to the uptake of maternity services. These determinants were higher socioeconomic status; education; privileged ethnicities such as Brahmins/Chhetris, people following the Hindu religion; accessible geography; access to transportation; family support; women's autonomy and empowerment; and a birth preparedness plan. Findings indicate the need for health and non-health sector interventions, including education linked to job opportunities; mainstreaming of marginalised communities in economic activities and provision of skilled providers, equipment and medicines. Interventions to improve maternal health should be viewed using a broad 'social determinants of health' framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"26 54","pages":"32-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2018.1535686","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health Matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1535686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Nepal has one of the highest maternal and neonatal mortality rates among low- and middle-income countries. Nepal's health system focuses on life-saving interventions provided during the antenatal to postpartum period. However, the inequality in the uptake of maternity services is of major concern. This study aimed to synthesise evidence from the literature regarding the social determinants of health on the use of maternity services in Nepal. We conducted a structured narrative review of studies published from 1994 to 2016. We searched five databases: PubMed; CINAHL; EMBASE; ProQuest and Global Index Medicus using search terms covering four domains: access and use; equity determinants; routine maternity services and Nepal. The findings of the studies were summarised using the World Health Organization's Social Determinants of Health framework. A total of 59 studies were reviewed. A range of socio-structural and intermediary-level determinants was identified, either as facilitating factors, or as barriers, to the uptake of maternity services. These determinants were higher socioeconomic status; education; privileged ethnicities such as Brahmins/Chhetris, people following the Hindu religion; accessible geography; access to transportation; family support; women's autonomy and empowerment; and a birth preparedness plan. Findings indicate the need for health and non-health sector interventions, including education linked to job opportunities; mainstreaming of marginalised communities in economic activities and provision of skilled providers, equipment and medicines. Interventions to improve maternal health should be viewed using a broad 'social determinants of health' framework.

影响尼泊尔常规产科服务利用的健康社会决定因素:对证据的叙述性审查。
尼泊尔是低收入和中等收入国家中孕产妇和新生儿死亡率最高的国家之一。尼泊尔卫生系统的重点是在产前至产后期间提供挽救生命的干预措施。然而,在接受产妇服务方面的不平等是一个主要问题。这项研究的目的是综合有关尼泊尔使用产妇服务的健康社会决定因素的文献证据。我们对1994年至2016年发表的研究进行了结构化的叙述性回顾。我们搜索了五个数据库:PubMed;CINAHL;EMBASE;ProQuest和全球索引Medicus使用的搜索词涵盖四个领域:访问和使用;股权决定因素;常规产妇服务和尼泊尔。这些研究的结果使用世界卫生组织的健康的社会决定因素框架进行了总结。共回顾了59项研究。确定了一系列社会结构和中间层面的决定因素,这些决定因素要么是促进因素,要么是接受产妇服务的障碍。这些决定因素是较高的社会经济地位;教育;特权民族,如婆罗门/切特里斯,信奉印度教的人;访问地理;交通便利;家人的支持;妇女自主和赋权;还有生育准备计划。调查结果表明,需要采取卫生和非卫生部门干预措施,包括与就业机会挂钩的教育;将边缘化社区纳入经济活动的主流,并提供熟练的提供者、设备和药品。改善产妇保健的干预措施应该从一个广泛的"健康的社会决定因素"框架来看待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters ( SRHM) promotes sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) globally through its journal and ''more than a journal'' activities. The Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters (SRHM) journal, formerly Reproductive Health Matters (RHM), is a peer-reviewed, international journal that explores emerging, neglected and marginalised topics and themes across the field of sexual and reproductive health and rights. It aims to publish original, relevant, and contemporary research, particularly from a feminist perspective, that can help inform the development of policies, laws and services to fulfil the rights and meet the sexual and reproductive health needs of people of all ages, gender identities and sexual orientations. SRHM publishes work that engages with fundamental dilemmas and debates in SRHR, highlighting multiple perspectives, acknowledging differences, and searching for new forms of consensus. SRHM strongly encourages research that explores experiences, values, information and issues from the point of view of those whose lives are affected. Key topics addressed in SRHM include (but are not limited to) abortion, family planning, contraception, female genital mutilation, HIV and other STIs, human papillomavirus (HPV), maternal health, SRHR in humanitarian settings, gender-based violence, young people, gender, sexuality and sexual rights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信