Emergency Physician-Performed Bedside Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis in a Pediatric Population.

Brian Tollefson, Jaryd Zummer, Phillip Dixon
{"title":"Emergency Physician-Performed Bedside Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis in a Pediatric Population.","authors":"Brian Tollefson,&nbsp;Jaryd Zummer,&nbsp;Phillip Dixon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background/Objective Many pediatric emergency departments in the United States have adopted a staged ultrasound and CT pathway for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. However, most algorithms only include radiology-performed ultrasound (RUS) and not emergency physician- performed bedside ultrasound (BUS). Our objective was to determine if emergency physician-performed BUS provides sufficient diagnostic accuracy for acute appendicitis in a pediatric population, thereby limiting additional cost and/or delays in disposition. Methods This is a single-center prospective study of pediatric patients with concern for and requiring further work-up for acute appendicitis. Each patient had a focused bedside ultrasound (BUS) performed by an emergency physician with training in BUS. Diagnostic accuracy was compared with surgical pathology standard, as well as radiology- performed ultrasound (RUS), computed tomography (CT), and clinical follow-up. Results Among46 enrolledpatients, 12were diagnosed with acute appendicitis (26%). There were no negative laparotomies in those who had surgery. There was one case of missed appendicitis at 4-week follow-up. BUS had a sensitivity of 100% (95% Cl: 72% to 100%) and. a specificity of 81% (61% to 93%) when the app6ndix'was visualized (37). This resulted in positive likelihood ratio of5.2 and a negative likelihood ratio ofo. In the cases where the appendix was not visualized on BUS (9), 1 patient was diagnosed with appendicitis, and the other 8 patients were negative for appendicitis. In RUS both the sensitivity and specificity was 100% when the appendix was visualized. The sensitivity and specificity of CT in our studywas 90% and 100% respectively. Conclusions Emergency physicians can perform bedside ultrasound with high accuracy for acute appendicitis in a pediatric population. When the appendix is not visualized by ultrasound, a staged ultrasound and CT pathway should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":17380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mississippi State Medical Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mississippi State Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objective Many pediatric emergency departments in the United States have adopted a staged ultrasound and CT pathway for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. However, most algorithms only include radiology-performed ultrasound (RUS) and not emergency physician- performed bedside ultrasound (BUS). Our objective was to determine if emergency physician-performed BUS provides sufficient diagnostic accuracy for acute appendicitis in a pediatric population, thereby limiting additional cost and/or delays in disposition. Methods This is a single-center prospective study of pediatric patients with concern for and requiring further work-up for acute appendicitis. Each patient had a focused bedside ultrasound (BUS) performed by an emergency physician with training in BUS. Diagnostic accuracy was compared with surgical pathology standard, as well as radiology- performed ultrasound (RUS), computed tomography (CT), and clinical follow-up. Results Among46 enrolledpatients, 12were diagnosed with acute appendicitis (26%). There were no negative laparotomies in those who had surgery. There was one case of missed appendicitis at 4-week follow-up. BUS had a sensitivity of 100% (95% Cl: 72% to 100%) and. a specificity of 81% (61% to 93%) when the app6ndix'was visualized (37). This resulted in positive likelihood ratio of5.2 and a negative likelihood ratio ofo. In the cases where the appendix was not visualized on BUS (9), 1 patient was diagnosed with appendicitis, and the other 8 patients were negative for appendicitis. In RUS both the sensitivity and specificity was 100% when the appendix was visualized. The sensitivity and specificity of CT in our studywas 90% and 100% respectively. Conclusions Emergency physicians can perform bedside ultrasound with high accuracy for acute appendicitis in a pediatric population. When the appendix is not visualized by ultrasound, a staged ultrasound and CT pathway should be considered.

急诊医师床边超声对儿童急性阑尾炎的评估。
背景/目的美国许多儿科急诊科采用分期超声和CT路径诊断急性阑尾炎。然而,大多数算法只包括放射科执行的超声(RUS),而不包括急诊医生执行的床边超声(BUS)。我们的目的是确定急诊医师实施的BUS是否为儿科人群的急性阑尾炎提供了足够的诊断准确性,从而限制了额外的费用和/或处置延误。方法:本研究是一项单中心前瞻性研究,研究对象为关注急性阑尾炎并需要进一步检查的儿科患者。每位患者均由接受过聚焦床边超声(BUS)培训的急诊医生进行聚焦床边超声检查。诊断准确性与外科病理标准、放射学超声(RUS)、计算机断层扫描(CT)和临床随访进行比较。结果在46例入组患者中,12例诊断为急性阑尾炎(26%)。接受手术的患者没有阴性剖腹手术。随访4周,阑尾炎漏诊1例。BUS的敏感性为100% (95% Cl: 72% ~ 100%)。当app6ndix'可视化时,特异性为81%(61%至93%)(37)。这导致正似然比为5.2,负似然比为ofo。在BUS未见阑尾的病例(9)中,1例诊断为阑尾炎,其余8例阑尾炎阴性。在RUS中,当阑尾可见时,灵敏度和特异性均为100%。本研究CT的敏感性为90%,特异性为100%。结论急诊医师对小儿急性阑尾炎行床边超声检查具有较高的准确性。当超声不能显示阑尾时,应考虑分阶段超声和CT路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信