Children are Crying and Dying while the Supreme Court is hiding: Why Public Schools Should Have Broad Authority to Regulate Off-Campus Bullying "Speech."

IF 1 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW
Fordham Law Review Pub Date : 2018-11-01
Jennifer Butwin
{"title":"Children are Crying and Dying while the Supreme Court is hiding: Why Public Schools Should Have Broad Authority to Regulate Off-Campus Bullying \"Speech.\"","authors":"Jennifer Butwin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bullying has long been a concern for students, parents, teachers, and school administrators. But technological advances--including the internet, cell phones, and social media--have transformed the nature of bullying and allow \"cyberbullies\" to extend their reach far beyond the schoolhouse gate. The U.S. Supreme Court established that schools may regulate on-campus speech if the speech creates a substantial disruption of, or material interference with, school activities. However, the Court has yet to rule on a school’s ability to regulate students' off-campus bullying speech. This Note examines how various courts have approached the issue, analyzes the current circuit split, and ultimately proposes that schools should have the authority to discipline students for off-campus bullying speech.</p>","PeriodicalId":47517,"journal":{"name":"Fordham Law Review","volume":"87 2","pages":"671-701"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fordham Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bullying has long been a concern for students, parents, teachers, and school administrators. But technological advances--including the internet, cell phones, and social media--have transformed the nature of bullying and allow "cyberbullies" to extend their reach far beyond the schoolhouse gate. The U.S. Supreme Court established that schools may regulate on-campus speech if the speech creates a substantial disruption of, or material interference with, school activities. However, the Court has yet to rule on a school’s ability to regulate students' off-campus bullying speech. This Note examines how various courts have approached the issue, analyzes the current circuit split, and ultimately proposes that schools should have the authority to discipline students for off-campus bullying speech.

孩子们在哭泣和死亡,而最高法院却在隐藏:为什么公立学校应该有广泛的权力来规范校外欺凌“言论”。
欺凌一直是学生、家长、老师和学校管理者关注的问题。但科技进步——包括互联网、手机和社交媒体——已经改变了欺凌的本质,让“网络恶霸”的影响范围远远超出了学校大门。美国最高法院规定,如果校内言论对学校活动造成实质性破坏或实质性干扰,学校可以对其进行监管。然而,最高法院尚未就学校是否有能力规范学生的校外欺凌言论做出裁决。本文考察了不同的法院是如何处理这个问题的,分析了目前的巡回法庭分歧,并最终提出学校应该有权对校外欺凌言论的学生进行纪律处分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Fordham Law Review is a scholarly journal serving the legal profession and the public by discussing current legal issues. Approximately 75 articles, written by students or submitted by outside authors, are published each year. Each volume comprises six books, three each semester, totaling over 3,000 pages. Managed by a board of up to eighteen student editors, the Law Review is a working journal, not merely an honor society. Nevertheless, Law Review membership is considered among the highest scholarly achievements at the Law School.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信