Multicenter Experience with Stenting for Symptomatic Carotid Web.

Q1 Medicine
Interventional Neurology Pub Date : 2018-10-01 Epub Date: 2018-07-11 DOI:10.1159/000489710
Diogo C Haussen, Jonathan A Grossberg, Sebastian Koch, Amer Malik, Dileep Yavagal, Benjamin Gory, Wolfgang Leesch, Ameer E Hassan, Anne-Laure Derelle, Sébastien Richard, Clara Barreira, Gustavo Pradilla, Raul G Nogueira
{"title":"Multicenter Experience with Stenting for Symptomatic Carotid Web.","authors":"Diogo C Haussen,&nbsp;Jonathan A Grossberg,&nbsp;Sebastian Koch,&nbsp;Amer Malik,&nbsp;Dileep Yavagal,&nbsp;Benjamin Gory,&nbsp;Wolfgang Leesch,&nbsp;Ameer E Hassan,&nbsp;Anne-Laure Derelle,&nbsp;Sébastien Richard,&nbsp;Clara Barreira,&nbsp;Gustavo Pradilla,&nbsp;Raul G Nogueira","doi":"10.1159/000489710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A carotid web (CaW) is a shelf-like lesion in the posterior aspect of the internal carotid bulb and represents an intimal variant of fibromuscular dysplasia. CaW has been associated with recurrent strokes and conventionally treated with surgical excision. We report a multicenter experience of stenting in patients with symptomatic CaWs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of consecutive patients admitted to 5 comprehensive stroke centers who were identified to have a symptomatic CaW and treated with carotid stenting. A symptomatic CaW was defined by the presence of a shelf-like/linear, smooth filling defect in the posterior aspect of the carotid bulb diagnosed by neck CT angiography (CTA) and confirmed with conventional angiography in patients with negative stroke workup.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four patients with stented symptomatic CaW were identified (stroke in 83% and transient ischemic attack in 17%). Their median age was 47 years (IQR 41-61), 14 (58%) were female, and were 17 (71%) black. The degree of stenosis by NASCET was 0% (range 0-11). All patients were placed on dual antiplatelets and stented at a median of 9 days (IQR 4-35) after the last event. Closed-cell stents were used in 18 (75%) of the cases. No periprocedural events occurred with the exception of 2 cases of asymptomatic hypotension/bradycardia. Clinical follow-up after stent placement occurred for a median of 12 months (IQR 3-19) with no new cerebrovascular events noted. Functional independence at 90 days was achieved in 22 (91%) patients. Follow-up vascular imaging (ultrasound <i>n</i> = 18/CTA <i>n</i> = 5) was performed at a median of 10 months (IQR 3-18) and revealed no stenosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stenting for symptomatic CaW appears to be a safe and effective alternative to surgical resection. Further studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":46280,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000489710","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000489710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Background: A carotid web (CaW) is a shelf-like lesion in the posterior aspect of the internal carotid bulb and represents an intimal variant of fibromuscular dysplasia. CaW has been associated with recurrent strokes and conventionally treated with surgical excision. We report a multicenter experience of stenting in patients with symptomatic CaWs.

Methods: Retrospective review of consecutive patients admitted to 5 comprehensive stroke centers who were identified to have a symptomatic CaW and treated with carotid stenting. A symptomatic CaW was defined by the presence of a shelf-like/linear, smooth filling defect in the posterior aspect of the carotid bulb diagnosed by neck CT angiography (CTA) and confirmed with conventional angiography in patients with negative stroke workup.

Results: Twenty-four patients with stented symptomatic CaW were identified (stroke in 83% and transient ischemic attack in 17%). Their median age was 47 years (IQR 41-61), 14 (58%) were female, and were 17 (71%) black. The degree of stenosis by NASCET was 0% (range 0-11). All patients were placed on dual antiplatelets and stented at a median of 9 days (IQR 4-35) after the last event. Closed-cell stents were used in 18 (75%) of the cases. No periprocedural events occurred with the exception of 2 cases of asymptomatic hypotension/bradycardia. Clinical follow-up after stent placement occurred for a median of 12 months (IQR 3-19) with no new cerebrovascular events noted. Functional independence at 90 days was achieved in 22 (91%) patients. Follow-up vascular imaging (ultrasound n = 18/CTA n = 5) was performed at a median of 10 months (IQR 3-18) and revealed no stenosis.

Conclusions: Stenting for symptomatic CaW appears to be a safe and effective alternative to surgical resection. Further studies are warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多中心支架术治疗症状性颈动脉网的经验。
背景:颈动脉网(CaW)是颈内动脉球后部的一种架状病变,是纤维肌肉发育不良的内膜变异型。CaW与复发性中风有关,通常采用手术切除治疗。我们报道了多中心对有症状的caw患者进行支架置入术的经验。方法:回顾性分析5家卒中综合中心确诊为症状性CaW并行颈动脉支架置入术的连续患者。颈CT血管造影(CTA)诊断颈动脉球囊后侧呈架状/线状平滑充盈缺损,并在卒中阴性患者中经常规血管造影证实为有症状的CaW。结果:发现24例有支架症状的CaW患者(卒中占83%,短暂性脑缺血发作占17%)。中位年龄为47岁(IQR 41-61),女性14例(58%),黑人17例(71%)。NASCET的狭窄程度为0%(范围0-11)。所有患者在最后一次事件发生后的中位9天(IQR 4-35)接受双重抗血小板药物治疗和支架植入。封闭细胞支架18例(75%)。除2例无症状性低血压/心动过缓外,无围手术期事件发生。支架置入术后的临床随访中位数为12个月(IQR 3-19),未发现新的脑血管事件。22例(91%)患者在90天内实现了功能独立。随访血管造影(超声n = 18/CTA n = 5),中位时间为10个月(IQR 3-18),未发现狭窄。结论:对于有症状的CaW,支架置入术似乎是一种安全有效的替代手术切除的方法。进一步的研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neurology
Interventional Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信