Evaluation of Enamel and Dentinal Microleakage in Class II Silorane-Based and Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite Restorations Using Specific and Nonspecific Adhesives.

Sayed Mostafa Mousavinasab, Maede Ghasemi, Mitra Yadollahi
{"title":"Evaluation of Enamel and Dentinal Microleakage in Class II Silorane-Based and Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite Restorations Using Specific and Nonspecific Adhesives.","authors":"Sayed Mostafa Mousavinasab,&nbsp;Maede Ghasemi,&nbsp;Mitra Yadollahi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate enamel and dentinal microleakage in Class II cavities restored with silorane- and methacrylate-based resin composites using specific and nonspecific adhesives.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-six caries-free human premolars were used. Two Class II cavities were prepared on each tooth. The gingival floor was set at 1 mm above (on the mesial surface) and at 1 mm below (on the distal surface) the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). The samples were randomly divided into four groups, and the cavities were restored with a methacrylate-based composite (Filtek<sup>™</sup> P60) and a silorane-based composite (Filtek<sup>™</sup> P90) with specific and nonspecific adhesives. Microleakage was tested using a standardized dye penetration method. All samples were examined under a stereomicroscope, and microleakage scores were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney-U tests. One sample from each group was examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to determine the bonding area.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of the enamel microleakage (P=0.086). There was a significant difference between the groups with regard to dentinal microleakage (P=0.003). No significant reduction in microleakage was observed in groups restored with Filtek<sup>™</sup> P90 composite using its specific adhesive compared to those restored with Filtek<sup>™</sup> P60 composite using its specific adhesive (P=0.626).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicated that the application of methacrylate- and silorane-based composites with specific or nonspecific adhesives had no impact on enamel microleakage, but it affected dentinal microleakage, and specific adhesives showed less microleakage. It seems that a phosphate-methacrylate-based intermediate resin is required to bond dimethacrylate adhesive to silorane-based composites.</p>","PeriodicalId":30286,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences","volume":"15 4","pages":"240-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6218466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate enamel and dentinal microleakage in Class II cavities restored with silorane- and methacrylate-based resin composites using specific and nonspecific adhesives.

Materials and methods: Thirty-six caries-free human premolars were used. Two Class II cavities were prepared on each tooth. The gingival floor was set at 1 mm above (on the mesial surface) and at 1 mm below (on the distal surface) the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). The samples were randomly divided into four groups, and the cavities were restored with a methacrylate-based composite (Filtek P60) and a silorane-based composite (Filtek P90) with specific and nonspecific adhesives. Microleakage was tested using a standardized dye penetration method. All samples were examined under a stereomicroscope, and microleakage scores were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney-U tests. One sample from each group was examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to determine the bonding area.

Results: No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of the enamel microleakage (P=0.086). There was a significant difference between the groups with regard to dentinal microleakage (P=0.003). No significant reduction in microleakage was observed in groups restored with Filtek P90 composite using its specific adhesive compared to those restored with Filtek P60 composite using its specific adhesive (P=0.626).

Conclusions: The results indicated that the application of methacrylate- and silorane-based composites with specific or nonspecific adhesives had no impact on enamel microleakage, but it affected dentinal microleakage, and specific adhesives showed less microleakage. It seems that a phosphate-methacrylate-based intermediate resin is required to bond dimethacrylate adhesive to silorane-based composites.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

ⅱ类硅烷基和甲基丙烯酸酯基树脂复合修复体使用特异性和非特异性粘接剂对牙釉质和牙本质微渗漏的评价。
目的:本研究的目的是评估用硅烷和甲基丙烯酸酯基树脂复合材料使用特异性和非特异性粘接剂修复的II类牙釉质和牙本质微渗漏。材料与方法:使用无龋的人前磨牙36颗。在每颗牙齿上准备两个II类空腔。龈底设置在牙髓-牙釉质交界处(CEJ)上方(中表面)1mm和下方(远表面)1mm处。将样本随机分为四组,用甲基丙烯酸酯基复合材料(Filtek™P60)和硅烷基复合材料(Filtek™P90)修复空腔,并使用特异性和非特异性粘合剂。采用标准化染料渗透法检测微泄漏。所有样品在体视显微镜下检查,并使用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney-U检验统计分析微泄漏评分。在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下检查每组的一个样品,以确定键合面积。结果:两组间牙釉质微渗漏无显著性差异(P=0.086)。两组牙本质微漏发生率差异有统计学意义(P=0.003)。与使用Filtek™P60复合材料使用其特定粘合剂修复组相比,使用Filtek™P90复合材料修复组的微渗漏没有显著减少(P=0.626)。结论:甲基丙烯酸酯和硅烷基复合材料与特异性或非特异性粘接剂的应用对牙釉质微渗漏无影响,但对牙本质微渗漏有影响,特异性粘接剂的微渗漏较少。似乎需要一种以甲基丙烯酸磷酸酯为基础的中间树脂来将二甲基丙烯酸酯粘合剂粘合到硅烷基复合材料上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信