[Comparison between Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl Infusion during Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation for Twin to Twin Transfusion Syndrome].

Manabu Yoshimura, Yoshiko Murakami, Yoshiko Matsumoto, Takashi Torumi, Masahiko Nakata
{"title":"[Comparison between Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl Infusion during Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation for Twin to Twin Transfusion Syndrome].","authors":"Manabu Yoshimura,&nbsp;Yoshiko Murakami,&nbsp;Yoshiko Matsumoto,&nbsp;Takashi Torumi,&nbsp;Masahiko Nakata","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fetoscopic laser coagulation is an ef- fective treatment for the vascular anastomoses present in twin to twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS); how- ever, anesthetic management during the procedure has not yet been standardized. We hypothesized that dex- medetomidine could produce excellent maternal seda- tion during fetoscopic surgery. Therefore, we per- formed a prospective study to compare dexmedetomi- dine with fentanyl infusion, which had been previously used for sedation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients scheduled for fetoscopic laser coagulation for TTTS were randomized into 2 groups. In the first group (n =19), fentanyl (2 μg · kg-1) was intravenously infused, followed by a maintenance dose of 1-2,μg · kg⁻¹ · hr⁻¹. The second group (n=18) received a loading dose of dexmedetomidine (1 μg · kg⁻¹) for 10 min, followed by a maintenance dose of 0.7 μg · kg⁻¹ · hr⁻¹. Both groups received 1% lidocaine administered locally. Adverse event incidence, hemo- dynamic parameters, and face scale were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One patient in the dexmedetomidine group required conversion to general anesthesia. Vomiting, nausea, and respiratory depression were significantly more frequent with fentanyl than with dexmedetomi- dine. Face scale scores were significantly better with dexmedetomidine than with fentanyl.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuous dexmedetomidine infusion provides acceptable maternal analgesia and sedation during endoscopic treatment of TTTS.</p>","PeriodicalId":18254,"journal":{"name":"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fetoscopic laser coagulation is an ef- fective treatment for the vascular anastomoses present in twin to twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS); how- ever, anesthetic management during the procedure has not yet been standardized. We hypothesized that dex- medetomidine could produce excellent maternal seda- tion during fetoscopic surgery. Therefore, we per- formed a prospective study to compare dexmedetomi- dine with fentanyl infusion, which had been previously used for sedation.

Methods: Patients scheduled for fetoscopic laser coagulation for TTTS were randomized into 2 groups. In the first group (n =19), fentanyl (2 μg · kg-1) was intravenously infused, followed by a maintenance dose of 1-2,μg · kg⁻¹ · hr⁻¹. The second group (n=18) received a loading dose of dexmedetomidine (1 μg · kg⁻¹) for 10 min, followed by a maintenance dose of 0.7 μg · kg⁻¹ · hr⁻¹. Both groups received 1% lidocaine administered locally. Adverse event incidence, hemo- dynamic parameters, and face scale were evaluated.

Results: One patient in the dexmedetomidine group required conversion to general anesthesia. Vomiting, nausea, and respiratory depression were significantly more frequent with fentanyl than with dexmedetomi- dine. Face scale scores were significantly better with dexmedetomidine than with fentanyl.

Conclusions: Continuous dexmedetomidine infusion provides acceptable maternal analgesia and sedation during endoscopic treatment of TTTS.

[双胎输血综合征胎儿镜激光光凝治疗中右美托咪定与芬太尼的比较]。
背景:胎儿镜激光凝固术是治疗双胎输血综合征(TTTS)血管吻合的有效方法;然而,手术过程中的麻醉管理尚未标准化。我们假设右美托咪定可以在胎儿镜手术中产生良好的产妇镇静效果。因此,我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,比较右美托咪啶和芬太尼输注,芬太尼以前用于镇静。方法:将拟行胎儿镜激光凝固治疗TTTS的患者随机分为两组。在第一组(n =19)中,静脉注射芬太尼(2 μg·kg-1),然后维持1-2,μg·kg·hr⁻¹。第二组(18人)接受右美托咪定的负荷剂量(1 μg·kg⁻¹)10分钟,然后维持0.7 μg·kg·hr⁻¹的剂量。两组均局部给予1%利多卡因。评估不良事件发生率、血流动力学参数和面部量表。结果:右美托咪定组1例患者需转全身麻醉。芬太尼组呕吐、恶心和呼吸抑制的发生率明显高于右美托咪啶组。右美托咪定组面部评分明显优于芬太尼组。结论:持续输注右美托咪定在内镜下治疗TTTS时提供了可接受的产妇镇痛和镇静作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信