Bolaji Lilian Ilesanmi-Oyelere, Jane Coad, Nicole Roy, Marlena Cathorina Kruger
{"title":"Lean Body Mass in the Prediction of Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women.","authors":"Bolaji Lilian Ilesanmi-Oyelere, Jane Coad, Nicole Roy, Marlena Cathorina Kruger","doi":"10.1089/biores.2018.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Owing to conflicting results of the association between body composition and bone mineral density (BMD), we investigated the relationship between fat mass (FM), lean mass (LM), and BMD in New Zealand postmenopausal women. We hypothesized that increased LM will indicate a higher BMD. A cross-sectional study was performed examining the associations between body composition, anthropometric measures, activity energy expenditure, and bone health status (using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA]). A total of 127 healthy postmenopausal women aged between 54 and 81 years. Both FM and LM were significantly associated with BMD at all sites. However, LM, not FM, was the strongest predictor of femoral neck (FN) BMD (β = 0.497, <i>p</i> < 0.001), hip BMD (β = 0.495, <i>p</i> < 0.001), spine BMD (β = 0.449, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and whole body BMD (β = 0.406, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Age was negatively associated with FN and hip BMD. LM was positively associated with FN, spine, hip, and whole body BMD. Our findings suggest the need to increase LM rather than FM highlighting the importance of physical activity for this age group.</p>","PeriodicalId":9100,"journal":{"name":"BioResearch Open Access","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/biores.2018.0025","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioResearch Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/biores.2018.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25
Abstract
Owing to conflicting results of the association between body composition and bone mineral density (BMD), we investigated the relationship between fat mass (FM), lean mass (LM), and BMD in New Zealand postmenopausal women. We hypothesized that increased LM will indicate a higher BMD. A cross-sectional study was performed examining the associations between body composition, anthropometric measures, activity energy expenditure, and bone health status (using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA]). A total of 127 healthy postmenopausal women aged between 54 and 81 years. Both FM and LM were significantly associated with BMD at all sites. However, LM, not FM, was the strongest predictor of femoral neck (FN) BMD (β = 0.497, p < 0.001), hip BMD (β = 0.495, p < 0.001), spine BMD (β = 0.449, p < 0.001), and whole body BMD (β = 0.406, p < 0.001). Age was negatively associated with FN and hip BMD. LM was positively associated with FN, spine, hip, and whole body BMD. Our findings suggest the need to increase LM rather than FM highlighting the importance of physical activity for this age group.
由于身体成分与骨密度(BMD)之间的关联结果相互矛盾,我们调查了新西兰绝经后妇女的脂肪量(FM),瘦量(LM)和骨密度之间的关系。我们假设LM升高意味着BMD升高。进行了一项横断面研究,检查了身体组成、人体测量、活动能量消耗和骨骼健康状况之间的关系(使用双能x线吸收仪[DXA])。共有127名年龄在54岁至81岁之间的健康绝经后妇女。FM和LM在所有部位均与BMD显著相关。然而,LM,而不是FM,是股骨颈(FN) BMD的最强预测因子(β = 0.497, p p p p
BioResearch Open AccessBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍:
BioResearch Open Access is a high-quality open access journal providing peer-reviewed research on a broad range of scientific topics, including molecular and cellular biology, tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, stem cells, gene therapy, systems biology, genetics, virology, and neuroscience. The Journal publishes basic science and translational research in the form of original research articles, comprehensive review articles, mini-reviews, rapid communications, brief reports, technology reports, hypothesis articles, perspectives, and letters to the editor.