Optimal Use of Ganciclovir and Valganciclovir in Transplanted Patients: How Does It Relate to the Outcome?

IF 0.9 Q3 SURGERY
Journal of Transplantation Pub Date : 2018-09-17 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/8414385
Maryam Mozaffar, Shahrzad Shahidi, Marjan Mansourian, Shirinsadat Badri
{"title":"Optimal Use of Ganciclovir and Valganciclovir in Transplanted Patients: How Does It Relate to the Outcome?","authors":"Maryam Mozaffar,&nbsp;Shahrzad Shahidi,&nbsp;Marjan Mansourian,&nbsp;Shirinsadat Badri","doi":"10.1155/2018/8414385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Organ transplant recipients receive immunosuppressive regimens to prevent transplant rejection, which put them at increased risk for opportunistic infections like cytomegalovirus (CMV). Ganciclovir and Valganciclovir are mostly used to prevent or treat CMV. Any incorrect use of the drug may have serious consequences for patients. In this study, the outcome of transplant recipients was assessed in relation to the optimal or suboptimal use of Ganciclovir or Valganciclovir.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed on 148 hospitalized patients who received Ganciclovir or Valganciclovir in the nephrology and kidney transplantation departments of our university hospitals, from March 2012 to December 2016. Patients' demographic and clinical data including dose and duration of treatment were collected and then analyzed in comparison with the standard CMV treatment protocols.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>About 94.6% of patients received Ganciclovir or Valganciclovir therapy consistent with the standard defined indications. The mean ratio of prescribed daily dose to the optimal dose was 2.9 in the first dose, 2.0 in the second dose, 1.3 in the third dose, and 1.5 in the fourth dose. From 148 included patients, 26.5% experienced CMV infection once, 7.2% experienced CMV infection twice, and 1.2% had CMV infection for 3 times, within six-month follow-up after first episode of antiviral therapy during hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, empiric anti-CMV therapy was initially given. The doses used were generally higher than recommended but we could not find more adverse events in the patients receiving high initial doses. In any case, it seems necessary to advocate use of standard treatment guidelines to avoid adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/8414385","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8414385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Organ transplant recipients receive immunosuppressive regimens to prevent transplant rejection, which put them at increased risk for opportunistic infections like cytomegalovirus (CMV). Ganciclovir and Valganciclovir are mostly used to prevent or treat CMV. Any incorrect use of the drug may have serious consequences for patients. In this study, the outcome of transplant recipients was assessed in relation to the optimal or suboptimal use of Ganciclovir or Valganciclovir.

Methods: This study was performed on 148 hospitalized patients who received Ganciclovir or Valganciclovir in the nephrology and kidney transplantation departments of our university hospitals, from March 2012 to December 2016. Patients' demographic and clinical data including dose and duration of treatment were collected and then analyzed in comparison with the standard CMV treatment protocols.

Findings: About 94.6% of patients received Ganciclovir or Valganciclovir therapy consistent with the standard defined indications. The mean ratio of prescribed daily dose to the optimal dose was 2.9 in the first dose, 2.0 in the second dose, 1.3 in the third dose, and 1.5 in the fourth dose. From 148 included patients, 26.5% experienced CMV infection once, 7.2% experienced CMV infection twice, and 1.2% had CMV infection for 3 times, within six-month follow-up after first episode of antiviral therapy during hospitalization.

Conclusion: In this study, empiric anti-CMV therapy was initially given. The doses used were generally higher than recommended but we could not find more adverse events in the patients receiving high initial doses. In any case, it seems necessary to advocate use of standard treatment guidelines to avoid adverse outcomes.

移植患者更昔洛韦和缬更昔洛韦的最佳使用:与预后有何关系?
目的:器官移植受者接受免疫抑制方案,以防止移植排斥反应,这使他们增加机会性感染的风险,如巨细胞病毒(CMV)。更昔洛韦和缬更昔洛韦主要用于预防或治疗巨细胞病毒。任何不正确的用药都可能给患者带来严重的后果。在这项研究中,移植受者的结果与更昔洛韦或缬更昔洛韦的最佳或次最佳使用有关。方法:对2012年3月至2016年12月在我院附属医院肾内科及肾移植科接受更昔洛韦或缬更昔洛韦治疗的148例住院患者进行研究。收集患者的人口学和临床数据,包括治疗剂量和持续时间,然后与标准CMV治疗方案进行比较分析。结果:约94.6%的患者接受了符合标准定义适应症的更昔洛韦或缬更昔洛韦治疗。处方日剂量与最佳剂量的平均比值为:第一剂为2.9,第二剂为2.0,第三剂为1.3,第四剂为1.5。在148例纳入的患者中,26.5%的患者在住院期间首次抗病毒治疗后随访6个月,CMV感染1次,7.2%的患者感染2次,1.2%的患者感染3次。结论:在本研究中,最初给予经验性抗巨细胞病毒治疗。使用的剂量通常高于推荐的剂量,但我们没有发现在接受高初始剂量的患者中有更多的不良事件。在任何情况下,似乎有必要提倡使用标准的治疗指南,以避免不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
4.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信