Results from the 2013 Senior's Health Services Survey: Rural and Urban Differences.

Janis E Campbell, Amanda E Janitz, Keith Kleszynski, Claire Dowers-Nichols, Amber S Anderson, Andrew N Dentino, Laurence Z Rubenstein, Thomas A Teasdale
{"title":"Results from the 2013 Senior's Health Services Survey: Rural and Urban Differences.","authors":"Janis E Campbell,&nbsp;Amanda E Janitz,&nbsp;Keith Kleszynski,&nbsp;Claire Dowers-Nichols,&nbsp;Amber S Anderson,&nbsp;Andrew N Dentino,&nbsp;Laurence Z Rubenstein,&nbsp;Thomas A Teasdale","doi":"10.4172/2471-9846.1000213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast health education needs of rural Oklahomans aged 65 and older compared to urban and sub-urban populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were distributed to a list of registered voters age 65 and older in Oklahoma with a total of 1,248 surveys returned. Survey items asked about interests in services, classes and activities, plus current barriers to accessing and/or engaging in such programs.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Survey respondents living in large rural towns (23.7%) and the urban core (21.5%) were significantly more likely than those in small rural towns (14.0%) or sub-urban areas (15.5%) to have attended a free health information event in the past year (<i>P</i>=0.0393). Older Oklahomans in small towns and isolated rural areas reported more frequently than those in the urban core that they would participate in congregate meals at a center (small town/isolated rural: 14.4%, urban core: 7.2%) (<i>P</i>=0.05). Lack of adequate facilities was more frequently reported by those residing in small town and isolated rural areas compared to urban core areas (16.4% <i>vs.</i> 7.8%, <i>P</i>=0.01). Finally, older Oklahomans in the large rural towns (0.6%) and small town and isolated rural locations (2.13%) less frequently reported use of senior information lines (Senior Infoline) than those in the urban core (6.0%) and in sub-urban areas (7.1%) (<i>P</i>=0.0009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results of this survey provide useful data on senior interests and current barriers to community programs/activities have some unique trends among both urban and rural populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":92236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community & public health nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2471-9846.1000213","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community & public health nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2471-9846.1000213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast health education needs of rural Oklahomans aged 65 and older compared to urban and sub-urban populations.

Methods: Surveys were distributed to a list of registered voters age 65 and older in Oklahoma with a total of 1,248 surveys returned. Survey items asked about interests in services, classes and activities, plus current barriers to accessing and/or engaging in such programs.

Findings: Survey respondents living in large rural towns (23.7%) and the urban core (21.5%) were significantly more likely than those in small rural towns (14.0%) or sub-urban areas (15.5%) to have attended a free health information event in the past year (P=0.0393). Older Oklahomans in small towns and isolated rural areas reported more frequently than those in the urban core that they would participate in congregate meals at a center (small town/isolated rural: 14.4%, urban core: 7.2%) (P=0.05). Lack of adequate facilities was more frequently reported by those residing in small town and isolated rural areas compared to urban core areas (16.4% vs. 7.8%, P=0.01). Finally, older Oklahomans in the large rural towns (0.6%) and small town and isolated rural locations (2.13%) less frequently reported use of senior information lines (Senior Infoline) than those in the urban core (6.0%) and in sub-urban areas (7.1%) (P=0.0009).

Conclusions: Results of this survey provide useful data on senior interests and current barriers to community programs/activities have some unique trends among both urban and rural populations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

2013年老年人健康服务调查结果:农村和城市差异。
目的:本研究的目的是比较和对比65岁及以上俄克拉荷马州农村人口与城市和亚城市人口的健康教育需求。方法:将调查分发给俄克拉荷马州65岁及以上的登记选民名单,共返回1248份调查。调查项目询问对服务、课程和活动的兴趣,以及目前获取和/或参与此类项目的障碍。调查结果:居住在大农村城镇(23.7%)和城市核心区(21.5%)的受访者在过去一年中参加免费健康信息活动的可能性明显高于农村小城镇(14.0%)或次城市地区(15.5%)(P=0.0393)在中心参加集体用餐(小镇/偏远农村:14.4%,城市核心:7.2%)(P=0.05)。与城市核心地区相比,居住在小镇和偏远农村地区的人更经常报告缺乏足够的设施(16.4%对7.8%,P=0.01)。最后,大农村城镇(0.6%)、小城镇和偏远农村地区(2.13%)的俄克拉荷马州老年人报告使用高级信息热线的频率低于城市核心区(6.0%)和次城市地区(7.1%)(P=0.0009)城市和农村人口的独特趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信