Simulation of settlement and bearing capacity of shallow foundations with soft particle code (SPARC) and FE.

IF 1.9 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Barbara Schneider-Muntau, Iman Bathaeian
{"title":"Simulation of settlement and bearing capacity of shallow foundations with soft particle code (SPARC) and FE.","authors":"Barbara Schneider-Muntau,&nbsp;Iman Bathaeian","doi":"10.1007/s13137-018-0109-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study we investigate the development of shear zones due to the settlement of shallow foundations and their load-settlement behavior. Firstly, a well-documented experiment of shallow penetration into sand is used for the validation of the soft particle code (SPARC). For these simulations a hypoplastic material model for sand with calibration for the model sand is implemented in SPARC. In order to deliver a more comprehensive investigation, the shape of the shear zones predicted by SPARC is also compared with the analytical solution. Secondly, the penetration of shallow foundation into clay is investigated by means of SPARC and the finite element method. For this purpose, barodesy for clay with the calibration for Dresden clay is implemented in both numerical methods. The simulations are carried out for six different surcharges, corresponding to a range of over-consolidated clay to normal-consolidated clay. Furthermore, the load-settlement behavior and the shape of shear zones for both methods are compared and the weaknesses and strengths of each numerical approach are discussed. Finally, the peaks of the load-settlement curves for all surcharges are compared with the analytical solution. Results show that SPARC performs better at predicting the trajectories of particles under the foundation, which consequently leads to better estimation of the load-settlement behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":44484,"journal":{"name":"GEM-International Journal on Geomathematics","volume":"9 2","pages":"359-375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s13137-018-0109-z","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GEM-International Journal on Geomathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13137-018-0109-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In this study we investigate the development of shear zones due to the settlement of shallow foundations and their load-settlement behavior. Firstly, a well-documented experiment of shallow penetration into sand is used for the validation of the soft particle code (SPARC). For these simulations a hypoplastic material model for sand with calibration for the model sand is implemented in SPARC. In order to deliver a more comprehensive investigation, the shape of the shear zones predicted by SPARC is also compared with the analytical solution. Secondly, the penetration of shallow foundation into clay is investigated by means of SPARC and the finite element method. For this purpose, barodesy for clay with the calibration for Dresden clay is implemented in both numerical methods. The simulations are carried out for six different surcharges, corresponding to a range of over-consolidated clay to normal-consolidated clay. Furthermore, the load-settlement behavior and the shape of shear zones for both methods are compared and the weaknesses and strengths of each numerical approach are discussed. Finally, the peaks of the load-settlement curves for all surcharges are compared with the analytical solution. Results show that SPARC performs better at predicting the trajectories of particles under the foundation, which consequently leads to better estimation of the load-settlement behavior.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

软颗粒法和有限元法模拟浅基础沉降与承载力。
在本研究中,我们研究了浅基础沉降引起的剪切带的发展及其荷载-沉降行为。首先,利用有充分资料的浅贯入砂试验对软颗粒代码(SPARC)进行验证。在SPARC中实现了砂的欠塑性模型,并对模型砂进行了标定。为了提供更全面的研究,还将SPARC预测的剪切带形状与解析解进行了比较。其次,采用SPARC法和有限元法对浅基础在粘土中的侵彻进行了研究。为此,在两种数值方法中都实现了黏土的正压性和德累斯顿黏土的标定。对六种不同的附加物进行了模拟,对应于超固结粘土到正常固结粘土的范围。此外,比较了两种数值方法的荷载沉降特性和剪切带形状,并讨论了每种数值方法的优缺点。最后,将各荷载沉降曲线的峰值与解析解进行了比较。结果表明,SPARC能较好地预测地基下颗粒的运动轨迹,从而更好地估计荷载沉降行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GEM-International Journal on Geomathematics
GEM-International Journal on Geomathematics MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信