Readmissions to hospital in a frail older cohort receiving a community-based transitional care service.

The New Zealand medical journal Pub Date : 2018-10-26
Claire P Heppenstall, Anne Chiang, H Carl Hanger
{"title":"Readmissions to hospital in a frail older cohort receiving a community-based transitional care service.","authors":"Claire P Heppenstall,&nbsp;Anne Chiang,&nbsp;H Carl Hanger","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate frequency of and reasons for hospital readmission in a frail older cohort receiving a community-based, multidisciplinary, transitional care service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study with descriptive analysis of reasons for readmission in a cohort of frail older people discharged from hospital with the service. Measures of frailty, comorbidity, cognition, quality of life and function were recorded at discharge. Readmissions were recorded within three months after index discharge. Discharge summaries were reviewed and reasons for readmission categorised. Outcomes following readmission were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Readmission rates were high (42%) in our cohort, despite the intervention. People readmitted had worse functional ability and a greater burden of comorbidities. Half of the readmissions were classified as being new, acute medical problems requiring inpatient treatment, and a quarter as exacerbations of chronic medical problems. Eighty-six percent of those readmitted were able to return home following their readmission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study showed high readmission rates despite the community supports. This high readmission rate does not imply failure of the intervention as the majority of these were with new or acute medical problems requiring inpatient treatment which were not preventable. Most were able to recover and return to their own homes.</p>","PeriodicalId":160836,"journal":{"name":"The New Zealand medical journal","volume":" ","pages":"38-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New Zealand medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To investigate frequency of and reasons for hospital readmission in a frail older cohort receiving a community-based, multidisciplinary, transitional care service.

Methods: A prospective cohort study with descriptive analysis of reasons for readmission in a cohort of frail older people discharged from hospital with the service. Measures of frailty, comorbidity, cognition, quality of life and function were recorded at discharge. Readmissions were recorded within three months after index discharge. Discharge summaries were reviewed and reasons for readmission categorised. Outcomes following readmission were recorded.

Results: Readmission rates were high (42%) in our cohort, despite the intervention. People readmitted had worse functional ability and a greater burden of comorbidities. Half of the readmissions were classified as being new, acute medical problems requiring inpatient treatment, and a quarter as exacerbations of chronic medical problems. Eighty-six percent of those readmitted were able to return home following their readmission.

Conclusions: Our study showed high readmission rates despite the community supports. This high readmission rate does not imply failure of the intervention as the majority of these were with new or acute medical problems requiring inpatient treatment which were not preventable. Most were able to recover and return to their own homes.

接受社区过渡性护理服务的体弱多病老年人再入院。
目的:调查接受社区、多学科过渡性护理服务的体弱老年队列再入院的频率和原因。方法:一项前瞻性队列研究,对使用该服务出院的体弱老年人队列再入院原因进行描述性分析。出院时记录患者的虚弱程度、合并症、认知、生活质量和功能。索引出院后3个月内再入院记录。审查出院总结并对再入院原因进行分类。记录再入院后的结果。结果:尽管进行了干预,我们的队列中再入院率仍然很高(42%)。再次入院的患者有更差的功能和更大的合并症负担。一半的再入院患者被归类为需要住院治疗的新的急性医疗问题,四分之一的患者被归类为慢性医疗问题的恶化。86%的重新接纳者能够在重新接纳后返回家园。结论:我们的研究显示,尽管社区支持,再入院率仍然很高。这种高再入院率并不意味着干预失败,因为其中大多数是新的或急性的医疗问题,需要住院治疗,这是不可预防的。大多数人能够康复并返回自己的家园。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书