Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Lesions of Oral Cavity and Salivary Glands: A Clinico-Pathological Study.

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Open Dentistry Journal Pub Date : 2018-09-28 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1745017901814010782
Shubhangi Shalley, Nasib Chand, Amit Aggarwal, Laxmi Narayan Garg, Varuni Yadav, Aashit Yadav
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Lesions of Oral Cavity and Salivary Glands: A Clinico-Pathological Study.","authors":"Shubhangi Shalley,&nbsp;Nasib Chand,&nbsp;Amit Aggarwal,&nbsp;Laxmi Narayan Garg,&nbsp;Varuni Yadav,&nbsp;Aashit Yadav","doi":"10.2174/1745017901814010782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) is a rapid, reliable and safe diagnostic tool used for various lesions of the oral cavity and salivary glands. The present study was undertaken to categorize the cytomorphology of the oral cavity and salivary gland lesions on FNAC and to assess the accuracy of FNAC in arriving at a diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective study on oral cavity swellings and salivary gland aspirates was done during a 2 year period from August 2015 to July 2017 in which a total of 70 FNAC's were performed. There were 12 aspirates obtained from oral cavity swellings and 58 aspirates were obtained from salivary glands. Histopathological evaluation of 65 lesions was done and was considered as gold standard. Only the lesions undergoing histopathological confirmation were included in the study. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility index were evaluated for accuracy of FNAC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hard palate (33.33%) was the predominantly aspirated site in the oral cavity. Parotid gland was the predominant gland aspirated (60.32%) among the involved salivary glands. Non-neoplastic lesions constituted 18.47% cases whereas neoplastic lesions were 81.53% (60.00% benign and 21.53% malignant). Pleomorphic adenoma (28.65%) was the most common benign lesion in the oral cavity involving hard palate and as salivary gland neoplasm (70.54%). Squamous cell carcinoma (60%) was the most common malignant lesion of oral cavity involving the tongue and buccal mucosa and adenoid cystic carcinoma (44.45%) was the commonest malignancy in salivary gland malignant neoplasms. The overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FNAC in the present study were 89.5%, 100% and 85% respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FNAC is a safe, cost-effective and reliable technique effective in diagnosing the spectrum of different lesions in the oral and maxillofacial region.</p>","PeriodicalId":47284,"journal":{"name":"Open Dentistry Journal","volume":"12 ","pages":"782-790"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1745017901814010782","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901814010782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Objective: Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) is a rapid, reliable and safe diagnostic tool used for various lesions of the oral cavity and salivary glands. The present study was undertaken to categorize the cytomorphology of the oral cavity and salivary gland lesions on FNAC and to assess the accuracy of FNAC in arriving at a diagnosis.

Materials and methods: A prospective study on oral cavity swellings and salivary gland aspirates was done during a 2 year period from August 2015 to July 2017 in which a total of 70 FNAC's were performed. There were 12 aspirates obtained from oral cavity swellings and 58 aspirates were obtained from salivary glands. Histopathological evaluation of 65 lesions was done and was considered as gold standard. Only the lesions undergoing histopathological confirmation were included in the study. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility index were evaluated for accuracy of FNAC.

Results: Hard palate (33.33%) was the predominantly aspirated site in the oral cavity. Parotid gland was the predominant gland aspirated (60.32%) among the involved salivary glands. Non-neoplastic lesions constituted 18.47% cases whereas neoplastic lesions were 81.53% (60.00% benign and 21.53% malignant). Pleomorphic adenoma (28.65%) was the most common benign lesion in the oral cavity involving hard palate and as salivary gland neoplasm (70.54%). Squamous cell carcinoma (60%) was the most common malignant lesion of oral cavity involving the tongue and buccal mucosa and adenoid cystic carcinoma (44.45%) was the commonest malignancy in salivary gland malignant neoplasms. The overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FNAC in the present study were 89.5%, 100% and 85% respectively.

Conclusion: FNAC is a safe, cost-effective and reliable technique effective in diagnosing the spectrum of different lesions in the oral and maxillofacial region.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

细针吸细胞学在口腔和唾液腺病变诊断中的准确性:临床病理研究。
目的:细针吸细胞学(FNAC)是一种快速、可靠、安全的口腔和唾液腺各种病变的诊断工具。本研究的目的是对FNAC对口腔和唾液腺病变的细胞形态学进行分类,并评估FNAC在诊断中的准确性。材料与方法:在2015年8月至2017年7月的2年时间内,对口腔肿胀和唾液腺抽吸进行了前瞻性研究,共进行了70例FNAC。口腔肿胀12例,唾液腺58例。对65个病变进行了组织病理学评估,并被认为是金标准。只有经组织病理学证实的病变被纳入研究。评价FNAC的敏感性、特异性、诊断准确性和临床实用指数的准确性。结果:口腔吸痰部位以硬腭为主(33.33%)。累及的唾液腺中以腮腺为主(60.32%)。非肿瘤性病变占18.47%,肿瘤性病变占81.53%,其中60.00%为良性,21.53%为恶性。多形性腺瘤(28.65%)是口腔最常见的良性病变,主要累及硬腭,其次是唾液腺肿瘤(70.54%)。涎腺恶性肿瘤中以腺样囊性癌(44.45%)和鳞状细胞癌(60%)最为常见。本研究FNAC的总体敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为89.5%、100%和85%。结论:FNAC是一种安全、经济、可靠的口腔颌面部病变诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Dentistry Journal
Open Dentistry Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信