Alcohol Related Harm: Knowledge Assessment of Medical and Nursing Staff in a General Hospital.

Israel journal of psychiatry Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Sol Jaworowski, David Raveh-Brawer, Cornelius Gropp, Paul S Haber, Jean-Louis Golmard, Joseph Mergui
{"title":"Alcohol Related Harm: Knowledge Assessment of Medical and Nursing Staff in a General Hospital.","authors":"Sol Jaworowski,&nbsp;David Raveh-Brawer,&nbsp;Cornelius Gropp,&nbsp;Paul S Haber,&nbsp;Jean-Louis Golmard,&nbsp;Joseph Mergui","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of alcohol related harm (ARH) in Israel has traditionally been low. The lack of familiarity with ARH may derive from the fact that in the past there was limited clinical exposure to these harms. However, ARH is becoming more common in Israel but it is unclear whether the medical and nursing workforce's knowledge is adequate to manage these problems. Our main objective was to assess knowledge regarding ARH among medical and nursing staff (MNS) in an Israeli university affiliated general hospital. We also aimed to compare knowledge of different MNS groups Methods: One hundred and twenty-seven MNS including consultants (senior physicians), residents, interns and nursing staff completed the Knowledge of Psychiatric Aspects of Alcohol Questionnaire (KPAAQ), a validated measure of knowledge concerning ARH comprised of five categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the four MNS groups in overall mean KPAAQ scores that varied from 45% (nurses) to 54% (interns). However, direct comparisons indicate that physicians scored higher than nurses (p=0.02). overall. The mean score for the KPAAQ category \"alcohol withdrawal syndrome\" was below 40% for all MNS groups. Physicians scored significantly higher than nursing staff (p=0.005). All MNS mean scores were greater than 63% for the category \"alcohol in pregnancy.\" This was the highest category score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Assessment of knowledge regarding ARH among MNS in a general hospital with a standardized instrument demonstrated no significant difference in knowledge of ARH among nursing staff, interns, residents and consultants apart from knowledge about alcohol withdrawal. However, the overall score of the physicians as a whole was significantly higher than the nursing group. These findings suggest a need to implement educational interventions in MNS to increase knowledge of ARH so as to promote the provision of brief interventions for patients with ARH.</p>","PeriodicalId":92228,"journal":{"name":"Israel journal of psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of alcohol related harm (ARH) in Israel has traditionally been low. The lack of familiarity with ARH may derive from the fact that in the past there was limited clinical exposure to these harms. However, ARH is becoming more common in Israel but it is unclear whether the medical and nursing workforce's knowledge is adequate to manage these problems. Our main objective was to assess knowledge regarding ARH among medical and nursing staff (MNS) in an Israeli university affiliated general hospital. We also aimed to compare knowledge of different MNS groups Methods: One hundred and twenty-seven MNS including consultants (senior physicians), residents, interns and nursing staff completed the Knowledge of Psychiatric Aspects of Alcohol Questionnaire (KPAAQ), a validated measure of knowledge concerning ARH comprised of five categories.

Results: There was no significant difference between the four MNS groups in overall mean KPAAQ scores that varied from 45% (nurses) to 54% (interns). However, direct comparisons indicate that physicians scored higher than nurses (p=0.02). overall. The mean score for the KPAAQ category "alcohol withdrawal syndrome" was below 40% for all MNS groups. Physicians scored significantly higher than nursing staff (p=0.005). All MNS mean scores were greater than 63% for the category "alcohol in pregnancy." This was the highest category score.

Conclusions: Assessment of knowledge regarding ARH among MNS in a general hospital with a standardized instrument demonstrated no significant difference in knowledge of ARH among nursing staff, interns, residents and consultants apart from knowledge about alcohol withdrawal. However, the overall score of the physicians as a whole was significantly higher than the nursing group. These findings suggest a need to implement educational interventions in MNS to increase knowledge of ARH so as to promote the provision of brief interventions for patients with ARH.

某综合医院医护人员酒精相关危害知识评估
背景:传统上,以色列酒精相关伤害(ARH)的患病率很低。对ARH缺乏了解可能是因为过去对这些危害的临床暴露有限。然而,ARH在以色列变得越来越普遍,但尚不清楚医疗和护理人员的知识是否足以管理这些问题。我们的主要目的是评估以色列一所大学附属总医院的医护人员(MNS)关于ARH的知识。方法:127名MNS(包括咨询师(高级医师)、住院医师、实习生和护理人员)完成了酒精精神病学方面的知识问卷(KPAAQ),这是一种有效的关于ARH知识的测量方法,包括五个类别。结果:4个MNS组的总体平均KPAAQ得分在45%(护士)到54%(实习生)之间无显著差异。然而,直接比较表明,医生得分高于护士(p=0.02)。整体。所有MNS组的KPAAQ类别“酒精戒断综合征”的平均得分低于40%。内科医生得分明显高于护理人员(p=0.005)。在“孕期饮酒”这一项中,所有MNS的平均得分都大于63%。这是最高的类别得分。结论:采用标准化仪器对综合医院MNS的ARH知识进行评估,结果显示护理人员、实习生、住院医师和会诊医师对ARH的知识除戒酒知识外无显著差异。然而,内科医生整体得分明显高于护理组。这些发现表明,有必要在MNS中实施教育干预措施,以增加ARH的知识,从而促进为ARH患者提供简短的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信