Muhammad Wasif Saif, Julie Fu, Melissa H Smith, Barbara Weinstein, Valerie Relias, Kevin P Daly
{"title":"Treatment with Lanreotide Depot Following Octreotide Long-Acting Release Among Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.","authors":"Muhammad Wasif Saif, Julie Fu, Melissa H Smith, Barbara Weinstein, Valerie Relias, Kevin P Daly","doi":"10.1089/pancan.2018.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To examine patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) who receive sequential treatment with somatostatin analogs. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This retrospective chart review examined lanreotide depot/autogel tolerability and efficacy among GEP-NET patients who received lanreotide after octreotide long-acting release (LAR) at Tufts University Medical Center. Information obtained included background patient characteristics, dosing, adverse events (AEs), radiologic response, and biochemical markers. <b>Results:</b> Patients (<i>n</i> = 16; 43-81 years; mean age, 64.25 years; 11 female) with nonfunctional, low-grade GEP-NETs receiving octreotide LAR 30-60 mg were transitioned to lanreotide because of patient decision (<i>n</i> = 6), disease progression (<i>n</i> = 6), AEs (<i>n</i> = 2), poor tolerance (<i>n</i> = 1), and injection discomfort/pain (<i>n</i> = 1). Lanreotide doses started at 120 mg (<i>n</i> = 13), 90 mg (<i>n</i> = 1), or 60 mg (<i>n</i> = 2); 8 patients received concomitant therapies, mostly liver-directed (radiofrequency ablation/radioembolization). AEs associated with lanreotide experienced by ≥2 patients were fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, hypertension, pancreatic enzyme deficiency, and hyperglycemia. Radiologic treatment responses of the combination of lanreotide with other therapeutic modalities included complete response (<i>n</i> = 1), partial response (<i>n</i> = 5), and stable disease (<i>n</i> = 9). One patient had radiologic progression. Serum serotonin and chromogranin levels decreased, but urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels appeared relatively unchanged. <b>Conclusion:</b> Among post-octreotide GEP-NET patients, including those with disease progression or poor octreotide tolerance, lanreotide alone or with concomitant therapies was well tolerated and associated with radiologic responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":16655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pancreatic Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/pancan.2018.0013","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pancreatic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pancan.2018.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Objective: To examine patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) who receive sequential treatment with somatostatin analogs. Materials and Methods: This retrospective chart review examined lanreotide depot/autogel tolerability and efficacy among GEP-NET patients who received lanreotide after octreotide long-acting release (LAR) at Tufts University Medical Center. Information obtained included background patient characteristics, dosing, adverse events (AEs), radiologic response, and biochemical markers. Results: Patients (n = 16; 43-81 years; mean age, 64.25 years; 11 female) with nonfunctional, low-grade GEP-NETs receiving octreotide LAR 30-60 mg were transitioned to lanreotide because of patient decision (n = 6), disease progression (n = 6), AEs (n = 2), poor tolerance (n = 1), and injection discomfort/pain (n = 1). Lanreotide doses started at 120 mg (n = 13), 90 mg (n = 1), or 60 mg (n = 2); 8 patients received concomitant therapies, mostly liver-directed (radiofrequency ablation/radioembolization). AEs associated with lanreotide experienced by ≥2 patients were fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, hypertension, pancreatic enzyme deficiency, and hyperglycemia. Radiologic treatment responses of the combination of lanreotide with other therapeutic modalities included complete response (n = 1), partial response (n = 5), and stable disease (n = 9). One patient had radiologic progression. Serum serotonin and chromogranin levels decreased, but urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels appeared relatively unchanged. Conclusion: Among post-octreotide GEP-NET patients, including those with disease progression or poor octreotide tolerance, lanreotide alone or with concomitant therapies was well tolerated and associated with radiologic responses.