Real-World Analysis of Dispensed International Units of Coagulation Factor VIII and Resultant Expenditures for Hemophilia A Patients: A Comparison Between Standard Half-Life and Extended Half-Life Products.

Q4 Medicine
Managed Care Pub Date : 2018-10-01
Amit Chhabra, Patrick F Fogarty, Bartholomew J Tortella, Dean Spurden, José Alvir, Margaret McDonald, Jennifer Hodge, Andreas M Pleil
{"title":"Real-World Analysis of Dispensed International Units of Coagulation Factor VIII and Resultant Expenditures for Hemophilia A Patients: A Comparison Between Standard Half-Life and Extended Half-Life Products.","authors":"Amit Chhabra,&nbsp;Patrick F Fogarty,&nbsp;Bartholomew J Tortella,&nbsp;Dean Spurden,&nbsp;José Alvir,&nbsp;Margaret McDonald,&nbsp;Jennifer Hodge,&nbsp;Andreas M Pleil","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify international units (IUs) dispensed and consequent expenditures for standard half-life (SHL) versus extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) replacement products in hemophilia A patients in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Two U.S. claims databases were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Number of IUs dispensed and quarterly expenditures for rFVIII products were collected from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart and Truven Health MarketScan Databases. Truven claims were also analyzed for factor IUs dispensed and expenditures for patients with data for ≥3 months before and after switching to an EHL product.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Optum and Truven databases, respectively, included 276 (SHL, n=243; EHL, n=33) and 500 (SHL, n=409; EHL, n=91) hemophilia A patients. Median quarterly factor IUs dispensed in Optum were 10% higher with EHL versus SHL products over nine quarters, and 45% higher with EHL versus SHL products in Truven over 10 quarters. Median quarterly expenditures in the EHL cohort were 51% (individual quarterly medians range, 1%-101%) higher than in the SHL cohort in Optum and 122% higher (individual quarterly medians range, 1%-189%) in Truven. Twenty-nine Truven patients switched to an EHL product; median factor IUs dispensed varied quarterly. The lowest SHL and highest EHL values occurred in the quarter immediately before switching and the first quarter post-switch, respectively. Overall median quarterly expenditures were higher post-switch; this was consistent over seven quarters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found higher expenditures over two years for hemophilia A patients using EHL versus SHL products. Switching to an EHL rFVIII product was associated with variable factor IUs dispensed and consistently higher expenditures.</p>","PeriodicalId":39329,"journal":{"name":"Managed Care","volume":"27 10","pages":"39-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To identify international units (IUs) dispensed and consequent expenditures for standard half-life (SHL) versus extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) replacement products in hemophilia A patients in a real-world setting.

Design: Two U.S. claims databases were analyzed.

Methodology: Number of IUs dispensed and quarterly expenditures for rFVIII products were collected from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart and Truven Health MarketScan Databases. Truven claims were also analyzed for factor IUs dispensed and expenditures for patients with data for ≥3 months before and after switching to an EHL product.

Results: The Optum and Truven databases, respectively, included 276 (SHL, n=243; EHL, n=33) and 500 (SHL, n=409; EHL, n=91) hemophilia A patients. Median quarterly factor IUs dispensed in Optum were 10% higher with EHL versus SHL products over nine quarters, and 45% higher with EHL versus SHL products in Truven over 10 quarters. Median quarterly expenditures in the EHL cohort were 51% (individual quarterly medians range, 1%-101%) higher than in the SHL cohort in Optum and 122% higher (individual quarterly medians range, 1%-189%) in Truven. Twenty-nine Truven patients switched to an EHL product; median factor IUs dispensed varied quarterly. The lowest SHL and highest EHL values occurred in the quarter immediately before switching and the first quarter post-switch, respectively. Overall median quarterly expenditures were higher post-switch; this was consistent over seven quarters.

Conclusion: We found higher expenditures over two years for hemophilia A patients using EHL versus SHL products. Switching to an EHL rFVIII product was associated with variable factor IUs dispensed and consistently higher expenditures.

血友病A患者的国际凝血因子VIII分配单位和由此产生的支出的现实世界分析:标准半衰期和延长半衰期产品的比较
目的:在现实世界中,确定血友病A患者标准半衰期(SHL)与延长半衰期(EHL)重组因子VIII (rFVIII)替代产品的国际单位(iu)分配和后续支出。设计:分析两个美国索赔数据库。方法:从Optum临床信息学数据集市和Truven健康市场扫描数据库收集rFVIII产品的单位分配数量和季度支出。还分析了Truven索赔在转换到EHL产品之前和之后的数据≥3个月的患者的因子iu分配和支出。结果:Optum和Truven数据库分别纳入276例(SHL, n=243;EHL, n=33)和500 (SHL, n=409;A型血友病患者91例。在9个季度中,Optum的EHL产品比SHL产品的季度因子iu中位数高10%,在10个季度中,Truven的EHL产品比SHL产品的季度因子iu中位数高45%。在Optum, EHL队列的季度支出中位数比SHL队列高51%(个体季度中位数范围,1%-101%),在Truven, EHL队列的季度支出中位数比SHL队列高122%(个体季度中位数范围,1%-189%)。29名Truven患者改用EHL产品;分配的因子中位数按季度变化。最低的SHL值和最高的EHL值分别出现在切换前的第一季度和切换后的第一季度。转换后的整体季度支出中位数更高;这在过去七个季度中都是一致的。结论:我们发现使用EHL产品的血友病A患者比使用SHL产品的血友病A患者两年的费用更高。切换到EHL rFVIII产品与分配的可变因素iu和持续较高的支出相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Managed Care
Managed Care Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信