RATIONALIZATION IN HEALTH: A LEGAL-CONSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE.

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
MEDICINE AND LAW Pub Date : 2015-09-01
Maria do Ceu Rueff
{"title":"RATIONALIZATION IN HEALTH: A LEGAL-CONSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE.","authors":"Maria do Ceu Rueff","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following Portugal's bailout, several measures concerning the rationalization of resources of the national health system have been recommended, aiming to improve the efficiency of services and generate additional savings. Our purpose is to approach this issue by asking for its conformity with the Constitution of the Portuguese Republic, and by further characterizing and discussing the right to health as a typical social right, the implementation of which presupposes the \"reserve of what is possible\" (including its dependence on existing economic resources). By taking into account a critical overview of the legal / constitutional doctrine, our analysis will focus on the relevant constitutional precept (art. 64, d), No. 3,) - which remits to the principle of economy in the provision of public services - and on the methodological challenges concerning the sustainability of the welfare state. We arrive at the doctrine of the \"essential core\" of social rights, followed by the discussion of how to determine the \"essential core\" of the right to health. As an example, we will discuss the sensitive issue of drugs prescription, clinical guidelines and governance, and forms by which prescribing patterns may be built. According to our approach, the essential core of the right to health for all (protected by the Constitution) presupposes the improvement of efficiency and the principle of economy in the National Health System.</p>","PeriodicalId":54182,"journal":{"name":"MEDICINE AND LAW","volume":"34 1","pages":"321-333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDICINE AND LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following Portugal's bailout, several measures concerning the rationalization of resources of the national health system have been recommended, aiming to improve the efficiency of services and generate additional savings. Our purpose is to approach this issue by asking for its conformity with the Constitution of the Portuguese Republic, and by further characterizing and discussing the right to health as a typical social right, the implementation of which presupposes the "reserve of what is possible" (including its dependence on existing economic resources). By taking into account a critical overview of the legal / constitutional doctrine, our analysis will focus on the relevant constitutional precept (art. 64, d), No. 3,) - which remits to the principle of economy in the provision of public services - and on the methodological challenges concerning the sustainability of the welfare state. We arrive at the doctrine of the "essential core" of social rights, followed by the discussion of how to determine the "essential core" of the right to health. As an example, we will discuss the sensitive issue of drugs prescription, clinical guidelines and governance, and forms by which prescribing patterns may be built. According to our approach, the essential core of the right to health for all (protected by the Constitution) presupposes the improvement of efficiency and the principle of economy in the National Health System.

健康方面的合理化:法律-宪法的观点。
在葡萄牙获得救助之后,提出了若干关于使国家卫生系统资源合理化的措施,目的是提高服务的效率并产生更多的储蓄。我们的目的是处理这一问题,要求将其与《葡萄牙共和国宪法》相一致,并进一步将健康权定性为一项典型的社会权利,并对其进行讨论,而实施健康权的先决条件是"尽可能保留"(包括对现有经济资源的依赖)。通过对法律/宪法理论的批判性概述,我们的分析将侧重于相关的宪法规则(第16条)。第64,d),第3,)条-这涉及到提供公共服务的经济原则-以及关于福利国家可持续性的方法挑战。我们得出了社会权利的"基本核心"原则,然后讨论了如何确定健康权的"基本核心"。作为一个例子,我们将讨论药物处方、临床指南和治理的敏感问题,以及可以建立处方模式的形式。根据我们的做法,人人享有健康权(受宪法保护)的基本核心是以提高国家卫生系统的效率和经济原则为前提的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信