The language profile of formal thought disorder.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Derya Çokal, Gabriel Sevilla, William Stephen Jones, Vitor Zimmerer, Felicity Deamer, Maggie Douglas, Helen Spencer, Douglas Turkington, Nicol Ferrier, Rosemary Varley, Stuart Watson, Wolfram Hinzen
{"title":"The language profile of formal thought disorder.","authors":"Derya Çokal,&nbsp;Gabriel Sevilla,&nbsp;William Stephen Jones,&nbsp;Vitor Zimmerer,&nbsp;Felicity Deamer,&nbsp;Maggie Douglas,&nbsp;Helen Spencer,&nbsp;Douglas Turkington,&nbsp;Nicol Ferrier,&nbsp;Rosemary Varley,&nbsp;Stuart Watson,&nbsp;Wolfram Hinzen","doi":"10.1038/s41537-018-0061-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Formal thought disorder (FTD) is clinically manifested as disorganized speech, but there have been only few investigations of its linguistic properties. We examined how disturbance of thought may relate to the referential function of language as expressed in the use of noun phrases (NPs) and the complexity of sentence structures. We used a comic strip description task to elicit language samples from 30 participants with schizophrenia (SZ), 15 with moderate or severe FTD (SZ + FTD), and 15 minimal or no FTD (SZ-FTD), as well as 15 first-degree relatives of people with SZ (FDRs) and 15 neurotypical controls (NC). We predicted that anomalies in the normal referential use of NPs, sub-divided into definite and indefinite NPs, would identify FTD; and also that FTD would also be linked to reduced linguistic complexity as specifically measured by the number of embedded clauses and of grammatical dependents. Participants with SZ + FTD produced more referential anomalies than NC and produced the fewest definite NPs, while FDRs produced the most and thus also differed from NC. When referential anomalies were classed according to the NP type in which they occurred, the SZ + FTD group produced more anomalies in definite NPs than NC. Syntactic errors did not distinguish groups, but the SZ + FTD group exhibited significantly less syntactic complexity than non-SZ groups. Exploratory regression analyses suggested that production of definite NPs distinguished the two SZ groups. These results demonstrate that FTD can be identified in specific grammatical patterns which provide new targets for detection, intervention, and neurobiological studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19328,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Schizophrenia","volume":"4 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1038/s41537-018-0061-9","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Schizophrenia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-018-0061-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

Formal thought disorder (FTD) is clinically manifested as disorganized speech, but there have been only few investigations of its linguistic properties. We examined how disturbance of thought may relate to the referential function of language as expressed in the use of noun phrases (NPs) and the complexity of sentence structures. We used a comic strip description task to elicit language samples from 30 participants with schizophrenia (SZ), 15 with moderate or severe FTD (SZ + FTD), and 15 minimal or no FTD (SZ-FTD), as well as 15 first-degree relatives of people with SZ (FDRs) and 15 neurotypical controls (NC). We predicted that anomalies in the normal referential use of NPs, sub-divided into definite and indefinite NPs, would identify FTD; and also that FTD would also be linked to reduced linguistic complexity as specifically measured by the number of embedded clauses and of grammatical dependents. Participants with SZ + FTD produced more referential anomalies than NC and produced the fewest definite NPs, while FDRs produced the most and thus also differed from NC. When referential anomalies were classed according to the NP type in which they occurred, the SZ + FTD group produced more anomalies in definite NPs than NC. Syntactic errors did not distinguish groups, but the SZ + FTD group exhibited significantly less syntactic complexity than non-SZ groups. Exploratory regression analyses suggested that production of definite NPs distinguished the two SZ groups. These results demonstrate that FTD can be identified in specific grammatical patterns which provide new targets for detection, intervention, and neurobiological studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

形式思维障碍的语言特征。
形式思维障碍(FTD)在临床上表现为言语紊乱,但对其语言特性的研究很少。我们研究了思维障碍如何与名词短语的使用和句子结构的复杂性所表达的语言的指称功能有关。我们使用漫画描述任务从30名精神分裂症患者(SZ), 15名中度或重度FTD (SZ + FTD), 15名轻度或无FTD (SZ-FTD),以及15名SZ患者的一级亲属(FDRs)和15名神经典型对照(NC)中提取语言样本。我们预测正常参考使用NPs(细分为明确和不确定NPs)的异常将识别FTD;此外,FTD还与语言复杂性的降低有关,具体衡量标准是嵌入式从句和语法依赖性的数量。SZ + FTD的参与者比NC产生更多的参考异常,产生的明确NPs最少,而fdr产生的最多,因此也不同于NC。当参照异常根据其发生的NP类型进行分类时,SZ + FTD组在确定的NP中产生的异常比NC多。语法错误没有组间差异,但SZ + FTD组的语法复杂性明显低于非SZ组。探索性回归分析表明,特定NPs的产生区分了两个SZ群体。这些结果表明,FTD可以在特定的语法模式中被识别,这为检测、干预和神经生物学研究提供了新的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Schizophrenia
NPJ Schizophrenia Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Schizophrenia is an international, peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish high-quality original papers and review articles relevant to all aspects of schizophrenia and psychosis, from molecular and basic research through environmental or social research, to translational and treatment-related topics. npj Schizophrenia publishes papers on the broad psychosis spectrum including affective psychosis, bipolar disorder, the at-risk mental state, psychotic symptoms, and overlap between psychotic and other disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信