The Option Value of Innovative Treatments for Metastatic Melanoma.

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Julia Thornton Snider, Seth Seabury, Mahlet Gizaw Tebeka, Yanyu Wu, Katharine Batt
{"title":"The Option Value of Innovative Treatments for Metastatic Melanoma.","authors":"Julia Thornton Snider,&nbsp;Seth Seabury,&nbsp;Mahlet Gizaw Tebeka,&nbsp;Yanyu Wu,&nbsp;Katharine Batt","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2016-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Treatment options in oncology have increased in recent years due to the quick pace of innovation. In the cancer care landscape, therapies that enable patients to live to the next innovation have additional value, \"option value,\" from the benefit of surviving to the next innovation. In such disease areas, providers and payers should consider this value when gauging the value of new therapies. The purpose of this study is to develop a model to estimate the additional survival patients attain from a therapy that allows them to live to benefit from further advances in care, and to apply the model to immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma. Methods The benefit of a therapy extends beyond immediate tumor control; it can also allow patients to live to benefit from further advances in care. This is a therapy's option value. Using data from the SEER cancer registry and clinical trial publications, we developed a model to estimate option value and applied it to ipilimumab, the first immune checkpoint modulator used to treat metastatic melanoma. Because ipilimumab extends survival, select patients benefited from survival extension to live to benefit from the introduction of PD-1 inhibitors (i.e. pembrolizumab and nivolumab). We calculated the option value of ipilimumab in terms of additional life-months patients gained by living to become potential candidates for PD-1 inhibitors, discounting at 3% per year. Results Patients taking ipilimumab as a second-line therapy for metastatic melanoma gained 10.5 months compared to patients taking the prior standard of care. Patients diagnosed in 2011, 2012, and 2013 gained an additional 1.6, 2.8, and 5.1 months of life expectancy, respectively, by living to see the introduction of PD-1 inhibitors. This equates to an option value of 15%, 27%, and 49%, respectively, of the conventionally calculated survival gain from ipilimumab. Ipilimumab had greater option value for patients diagnosed in later years who were more likely to live to the introduction of PD-1 inhibitors. Conclusions Therapies that enable patients to see further advances in care have option value. Option value is particularly important to patients with disease areas undergoing rapid innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/fhep-2016-0014","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2016-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background Treatment options in oncology have increased in recent years due to the quick pace of innovation. In the cancer care landscape, therapies that enable patients to live to the next innovation have additional value, "option value," from the benefit of surviving to the next innovation. In such disease areas, providers and payers should consider this value when gauging the value of new therapies. The purpose of this study is to develop a model to estimate the additional survival patients attain from a therapy that allows them to live to benefit from further advances in care, and to apply the model to immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma. Methods The benefit of a therapy extends beyond immediate tumor control; it can also allow patients to live to benefit from further advances in care. This is a therapy's option value. Using data from the SEER cancer registry and clinical trial publications, we developed a model to estimate option value and applied it to ipilimumab, the first immune checkpoint modulator used to treat metastatic melanoma. Because ipilimumab extends survival, select patients benefited from survival extension to live to benefit from the introduction of PD-1 inhibitors (i.e. pembrolizumab and nivolumab). We calculated the option value of ipilimumab in terms of additional life-months patients gained by living to become potential candidates for PD-1 inhibitors, discounting at 3% per year. Results Patients taking ipilimumab as a second-line therapy for metastatic melanoma gained 10.5 months compared to patients taking the prior standard of care. Patients diagnosed in 2011, 2012, and 2013 gained an additional 1.6, 2.8, and 5.1 months of life expectancy, respectively, by living to see the introduction of PD-1 inhibitors. This equates to an option value of 15%, 27%, and 49%, respectively, of the conventionally calculated survival gain from ipilimumab. Ipilimumab had greater option value for patients diagnosed in later years who were more likely to live to the introduction of PD-1 inhibitors. Conclusions Therapies that enable patients to see further advances in care have option value. Option value is particularly important to patients with disease areas undergoing rapid innovation.

转移性黑色素瘤创新治疗的选择价值。
近年来,由于创新的快速步伐,肿瘤学的治疗选择有所增加。在癌症治疗领域,使患者能够活到下一个创新的疗法具有额外的价值,“选择价值”,从生存到下一个创新的好处。在这些疾病领域,提供者和支付者在衡量新疗法的价值时应考虑这一价值。本研究的目的是建立一个模型来估计患者从治疗中获得的额外生存率,使他们能够从进一步的护理中获益,并将该模型应用于转移性黑色素瘤的免疫治疗。方法一种治疗的益处超出了立即控制肿瘤;它还可以让患者从进一步的护理中受益。这是一种治疗的选择值。利用来自SEER癌症登记和临床试验出版物的数据,我们开发了一个模型来估计选择值,并将其应用于ipilimumab,这是第一个用于治疗转移性黑色素瘤的免疫检查点调节剂。由于ipilimumab延长了生存期,选择的患者受益于延长生存期,从而受益于PD-1抑制剂的引入(即派姆单抗和纳武单抗)。我们计算了ipilimumab的选择价值,即通过存活成为PD-1抑制剂的潜在候选者而获得的额外生命月,每年折扣率为3%。结果:与接受先前标准治疗的患者相比,接受ipilimumab作为转移性黑色素瘤二线治疗的患者延长了10.5个月。2011年、2012年和2013年诊断出的患者,通过活到PD-1抑制剂的引入,预期寿命分别增加了1.6个月、2.8个月和5.1个月。这相当于依匹单抗常规计算的生存增益的15%、27%和49%的选择值。Ipilimumab对于晚期诊断的患者具有更大的选择价值,这些患者更有可能活到引入PD-1抑制剂。结论:使患者在治疗中看到进一步进展的治疗方法具有选择价值。对于正在经历快速创新的疾病领域的患者,期权价值尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forum for Health Economics and Policy
Forum for Health Economics and Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Forum for Health Economics & Policy (FHEP) showcases articles in key substantive areas that lie at the intersection of health economics and health policy. The journal uses an innovative structure of forums to promote discourse on the most pressing and timely subjects in health economics and health policy, such as biomedical research and the economy, and aging and medical care costs. Forums are chosen by the Editorial Board to reflect topics where additional research is needed by economists and where the field is advancing rapidly. The journal is edited by Katherine Baicker, David Cutler and Alan Garber of Harvard University, Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford University, Dana Goldman of the University of Southern California and RAND Corporation, Neeraj Sood of the University of Southern California, Anup Malani and Tomas Philipson of University of Chicago, Pinar Karaca Mandic of the University of Minnesota, and John Romley of the University of Southern California. FHEP is sponsored by the Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics at the University of Southern California. A subscription to the journal also includes the proceedings from the National Bureau of Economic Research''s annual Frontiers in Health Policy Research Conference. Topics: Economics, Political economics, Biomedical research and the economy, Aging and medical care costs, Nursing, Cancer studies, Medical treatment, Others related.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信