Auditory comprehension performance of college students with and without sport concussion on Computerized-Revised Token Test Subtest VIII.

Q3 Medicine

Concussion Pub Date : 2017-05-08 eCollection Date: 2017-06-01 DOI:10.2217/cnc-2016-0024

Anthony P Salvatore, Michael Cannito, Heather E Brassil, Edina R Bene, Bess Sirmon-Taylor

{"title":"Auditory comprehension performance of college students with and without sport concussion on Computerized-Revised Token Test Subtest VIII.","authors":"Anthony P Salvatore, Michael Cannito, Heather E Brassil, Edina R Bene, Bess Sirmon-Taylor","doi":"10.2217/cnc-2016-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Auditory comprehension (AC) and visually assessed cognitive functions were compared in early stage postconcussed (PC) athletes and healthy controls using the Subtest VIII of the Computerized-Revised Token Test (C-RTT) and Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Test (ImPACT).Results: As compared with healthy controls (n = 30), PC subjects (n = 30) had significantly lower C-RTT efficiency scores (p = 0.018), and lower ImPACT scores; total symptom score (p = 0.000.), verbal memory (p = 0.000), visual memory (p = 0.000), visual motor speed (p = 0.000) and reaction time (p = 0.004) in this post-test only matched subject design. Impulse Control was not significant (p = 0.613). Multiple regression and ANOVA indicated an association with reaction time only (p = 0.012) for the PC subjects. After controlling for reaction time, a significant difference in AC remained.Conclusion: The relationship between AC and other visually assessed cognitive functions was inconsistent suggesting that the C-RTT and ImPACT assessed different functional systems.","PeriodicalId":37006,"journal":{"name":"Concussion","volume":"2 2","pages":"CNC37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/cnc-2016-0024","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concussion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/cnc-2016-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Abstract

Aim: Auditory comprehension (AC) and visually assessed cognitive functions were compared in early stage postconcussed (PC) athletes and healthy controls using the Subtest VIII of the Computerized-Revised Token Test (C-RTT) and Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Test (ImPACT).

Results: As compared with healthy controls (n = 30), PC subjects (n = 30) had significantly lower C-RTT efficiency scores (p = 0.018), and lower ImPACT scores; total symptom score (p = 0.000.), verbal memory (p = 0.000), visual memory (p = 0.000), visual motor speed (p = 0.000) and reaction time (p = 0.004) in this post-test only matched subject design. Impulse Control was not significant (p = 0.613). Multiple regression and ANOVA indicated an association with reaction time only (p = 0.012) for the PC subjects. After controlling for reaction time, a significant difference in AC remained.

Conclusion: The relationship between AC and other visually assessed cognitive functions was inconsistent suggesting that the C-RTT and ImPACT assessed different functional systems.

查看原文本刊更多论文

运动脑震荡大学生与非运动脑震荡大学生的听觉理解在计算机修正标记测试子测试VIII中的表现。

目的:采用计算机化修正标记测试(C-RTT)和脑震荡后立即评估和认知测试(ImPACT)的子测试VIII，比较早期脑震荡后(PC)运动员和健康对照组的听觉理解(AC)和视觉评估的认知功能。结果:与健康对照组(n = 30)相比，PC组(n = 30)的C-RTT效率得分显著低于健康对照组(p = 0.018)， ImPACT得分显著低于健康对照组(p = 0.018);该后验的总症状评分(p = 0.000)、言语记忆(p = 0.000)、视觉记忆(p = 0.000)、视觉运动速度(p = 0.000)和反应时间(p = 0.004)仅与受试者设计匹配。冲量控制差异无统计学意义(p = 0.613)。多元回归和方差分析显示，PC受试者仅与反应时间相关(p = 0.012)。在控制反应时间后，AC仍然存在显著差异。结论:AC与其他视觉认知功能的关系不一致，表明C-RTT和ImPACT评估的是不同的功能系统。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊