Amaal J Starling, Danielle F Leong, Jamie M Bogle, Bert B Vargas
{"title":"Variability of the modified Balance Error Scoring System at baseline using objective and subjective balance measures.","authors":"Amaal J Starling, Danielle F Leong, Jamie M Bogle, Bert B Vargas","doi":"10.2217/cnc.15.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate preseason modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS) performance in a collegiate football cohort; to compare scores to an objective mobile balance measurement tool.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Eighty-two athletes completed simultaneous balance testing using mBESS and the King-Devick Balance Test, an objective balance measurement tool. Errors on mBESS and objective measurements in the double-leg, single-leg (SS) and tandem stances were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean mBESS error score was 7.23 ± 4.65. The SS accounted for 74% of errors and 21% of athletes demonstrated the maximum error score. There was no significant correlation between mBESS score and objective balance score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high variability and large number of errors in the SS raises concerns over the utility of the SS in identifying suspected concussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":37006,"journal":{"name":"Concussion","volume":"1 1","pages":"CNC5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/cnc.15.5","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concussion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/cnc.15.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25
Abstract
Aim: To investigate preseason modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS) performance in a collegiate football cohort; to compare scores to an objective mobile balance measurement tool.
Materials & methods: Eighty-two athletes completed simultaneous balance testing using mBESS and the King-Devick Balance Test, an objective balance measurement tool. Errors on mBESS and objective measurements in the double-leg, single-leg (SS) and tandem stances were compared.
Results: Mean mBESS error score was 7.23 ± 4.65. The SS accounted for 74% of errors and 21% of athletes demonstrated the maximum error score. There was no significant correlation between mBESS score and objective balance score.
Conclusion: The high variability and large number of errors in the SS raises concerns over the utility of the SS in identifying suspected concussion.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
